Received: from mail-vb0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]:40148) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Tzf6W-00017Z-G5; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:10:02 -0800 Received: by mail-vb0-f61.google.com with SMTP id fs19sf1411974vbb.6 for ; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:09:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :x-yahoo-newman-property:x-yahoo-newman-id:x-ymail-osg :x-rocket-mimeinfo:x-mailer:references:message-id:date:from:reply-to :subject:to:in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=MjvJOzj2wpbrXTzdtl5/MD5SqxA0u0it87n4ryqOgTc=; b=T/TLUGwnbLAKYws3cYavQ30dmcRzMJistKKj8X3VvMMcsyzC2m4VNm1D0bfEnTBEgH U9GF2ilczccJrwWXUlVQufe1Y33sEkL2DMipYRydi/qtJnU7tD5wZB3JvpJfKnffHMAZ ZYkhh9pSoepdhpq2D/OKRoVBEV+7rAnFkOx7+z6ClSN9xJRCOzGhDp41lq2TYAMBtt4y nw8FtS8j6COlWyKoabC49+7Yvr2uJnk7PfdvxKZ6pFmlMHHnZ+4/qTCzYKIquVGQbQHx TAxL5mL8g8P4+ZPmeWW8NhziNRh/wAGSRp7tuDpQhhAl9FyPAosk3U8ajwRpqlgwERZg xGVQ== X-Received: by 10.49.58.238 with SMTP id u14mr2117218qeq.13.1359342585766; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:09:45 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.109.170 with SMTP id ht10ls894575qeb.62.gmail; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:09:43 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.236.147.210 with SMTP id t58mr6765530yhj.29.1359342583877; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:09:43 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.236.147.210 with SMTP id t58mr6765529yhj.29.1359342583858; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:09:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from nm13.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com (nm13.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com. [66.94.237.214]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u28si358795yhm.1.2013.01.27.19.09.43 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:09:43 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.237.214 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.94.237.214; Received: from [66.94.237.196] by nm13.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Jan 2013 03:09:43 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.106] by tm7.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Jan 2013 03:09:43 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1011.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Jan 2013 03:09:43 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 165543.61003.bm@omp1011.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 81089 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Jan 2013 03:09:42 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: .PIOAUQVM1kqUyJuHI_LjidnwQ1kp8L6_sv1nx3_Rjlxh_i xeGAnTIHSu8bvZExCoGsYAgtR3P5324dkW5cW.LhUSpTwm4zq2qOBzy.dAoH hmUGXxce9T7SDzM1XPbMOqtySyKewGWYtrq3jSS.zf31sVlIy8an3oOJPt9N 5hVWOMh8lGylCqlwW56xD552E3Be0xv0hhpNAB7MFVRtrBA2xmJdO4Mlkw0F rxlkfYgCFqLJBEiF0KPld0lg10rGQtFOL1ZS6JAUiAd_3iGh7HUbVIpsyHdL XJYlDO8KhXFy3S3M8ewggMHs2.Lti_yblpras1UjOYGZ7UcGp9NhjnJ59810 5_nw2SRPH4BmaL2geDC2zxdUKR28sB3uehKnnmyRDmPj7B4adMse6aywq00n p4NAsyz89_pldHj2dnPnll0jp38u5WGLXpiZ0w.RSPGfSsQ7DY.v7vvAW55j TQb5G_s4EzEaoba54XNKoRqCDG_OziR7b_dnkF2GQYMfwuI2durH78Gy_R5b _Dj8gTqCjUPIGUY437.P6DX4SY_lG6J5P7SfbaQViHVJCDwBPMRhujMKMgkt OhqyzowxIuQdNnUHLbp9WafBnQMnkWd.Z5w_uJOKcy0uuFhor4tqB7g03kF6 znObN2wIKCGmeWTz.XC2CJBnsMOd60tElPJnjGP4RlYKXgopnwD0_qXgbego GlU76pilQaF0nL1b8G3WAvmCh_Jq21XllXK6XZ2NgonyRARMndLkPZdJgo4H .pd5z_aESx59CBLkjPCx8HV3DtKjjFSbgTMpBDzU767JzGemK Received: from [99.92.108.194] by web184403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:09:42 PST X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 001.001,wqBUaGUgc3Rvcnkgb2Yge2xvfSBjb250aW51ZXMgdG8gZGV2ZWxvcCB0b3dhcmQgYSByZWFzb25hYmxlIHBsYWNlLsKgIEl0IGludHJvZHVjZXMgdGhlIHNhbGllbnQgbWVtYmVycyBvZiB0aGUgY2xhc3MsIG1hZGUgc28gZWl0aGVyIGJ5IGNvbnRleHQgb3IgYnkgYW4gZWFybGllciB7c3UnbyBkYSBwb2l9IG9yIHdoYXRldmVyLsKgIHtsZX0gY29udGludWVzIGluIGEgc3RpbGwgbW9yZSBvYnNjdXJlIHVzYWdlLCB3aG9zZSBvbmx5IHZpcnR1ZSBzZWVtcyB0byBiZSB0aGF0IHRoZSBkZXNjcmlwdGlvbiBtYXkBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.130.494 References: <1696426.fuu6unn560@caracal> Message-ID: <1359342582.81012.YahooMailNeo@web184403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:09:42 -0800 (PST) From: John E Clifford Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Aesop's "The Wolf and the Crane" To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.237.214 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass header.i=@yahoo.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-6906265-256507063-1359342582=:81012" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ---6906265-256507063-1359342582=:81012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =A0The story of {lo} continues to develop toward a reasonable place.=A0 It = introduces the salient members of the class, made so either by context or b= y an earlier {su'o da poi} or whatever.=A0 {le} continues in a still more o= bscure usage, whose only virtue seems to be that the description may not be= accurate (not an obvious advantage).=A0 {lo} keeps its referent throughout= the context, amounting to an implicitly far left particular quantifier (an= d even absorbs the earlier quantifier, if there was one).=A0 Ot at least th= at is the extrapolation of the current trend. ________________________________ From: Remo Dentato To: lojban =20 Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 10:10 AM Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Aesop's "The Wolf and the Crane" =20 Thanks, Pierre. Sumti that are attached to a selbri in a place that is undefined in jbovlas= te, get a "context dependend" meaning. It would be very stretchy to interpr= et the tunlo2 differently from "what is being swallowed". That said, I thin= k that tunlo2 should have been defined this way since the beginning :) About lo/le, I have the habit of switching to {le} when I talk about a spec= ific thing that might have been introduced with {lo}. After having said {lo labno noi ....} any time I write {le labno} I mean *t= hat* wolf. If I wrote {lo labno} I might mean another wolf. Actually I do expect the listener to understand which one I mean, of course= I'm not guaranteed that he/she will but, if I'm careful, I hope I can be u= nderstood. Otherwise it would rather useless to me. On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote: On Sunday, January 27, 2013 11:38:00 Remo Dentato wrote: >> A link would be probably useful :) >> >> http://xanrilisri.thecomicseries.com/ > >According to jbovlaste, "tunlo" does not have an x2. According to jbofi'e,= it >does. > >Normally in Lojban, unlike English, French, and I suppose also Italian, on= e >does not switch from the indefinite article to the definite on second refe= rence. >"le" indicates that the speaker has something in mind, but not that he exp= ects >the listener to know what it is. > >Pierre >-- >li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa > > >-- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups = "lojban" group. >To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegro= ups.com. >Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. >For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ---6906265-256507063-1359342582=:81012 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 The = story of {lo} continues to develop toward a reasonable place.  It intr= oduces the salient members of the class, made so either by context or by an= earlier {su'o da poi} or whatever.  {le} continues in a still more ob= scure usage, whose only virtue seems to be that the description may not be = accurate (not an obvious advantage).  {lo} keeps its referent througho= ut the context, amounting to an implicitly far left particular quantifier (= and even absorbs the earlier quantifier, if there was one).  Ot at lea= st that is the extrapolation of the current trend.

From: Remo Dentato <rdentato@gmail.com>
To: lojban <lojban@googlegroups.com>
= Sent: Sunday, January 27, = 2013 10:10 AM
Subject:= Re: [lojban] Re: Aesop's "The Wolf and the Crane"

Thanks, Pierre.
Sumti that are attached to a selbri in a place that is undefined in jb= ovlaste, get a "context dependend" meaning. It would be very stretchy to in= terpret the tunlo2 differently from "what is being swallowed". That said, I= think that tunlo2 should have been defined this way since the beginning :)=

About lo/le, I have the habit of switching to {le} when I talk ab= out a specific thing that might have been introduced with {lo}.
Af= ter having said {lo labno noi ....} any time I write {le labno} I mean *tha= t* wolf. If I wrote {lo labno} I might mean another wolf.
Actually I do expect the listener to understand which one I mean, of = course I'm not guaranteed that he/she will but, if I'm careful, I hope I ca= n be understood. Otherwise it would rather useless to me.



On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org> wrote:
O= n Sunday, January 27, 2013 11:38:00 Remo Dentato wrote:
> A link would be probably useful :)
>
> http://xanrilisri.thecomicseries.com/

According to jbovlaste, "tunlo" does not have an x2. According to jbo= fi'e, it
does.

Normally in Lojban, unlike English, French, and I suppose also Italian, one=
does not switch from the indefinite article to the definite on second refer= ence.
"le" indicates that the speaker has something in mind, but not that he expe= cts
the listener to know what it is.

Pierre
--
li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegro= ups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_o= ut.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_o= ut.
 
 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
---6906265-256507063-1359342582=:81012--