Received: from mail-gg0-f191.google.com ([209.85.161.191]:40726) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TzuRx-0005pr-B0; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:33:10 -0800 Received: by mail-gg0-f191.google.com with SMTP id r1sf1758456ggn.8 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:32:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=OVTA4G5a8BaOhZyIDZLXeXAeFjDe+nWW+bAR7srJHPU=; b=QXH9Uo/aKpiJsQbhzpLx+mB4Ah8CeFyKSaN45A5EygQ30teJm3arKX0m5R3XAW4lIj 0NsfcB0L+RRnf55W93v0ezLsNH6yKc+3MGvedZu3vmEuoxr2F5LSSa5nXmH405OVropD /0qIEk5CAaf3rnrqsxwd8MLjNrOXXcyvu9WrfsmQSRDP71QxGCzy0LWYXxinJpF+/G1L r+mQBm1U0zFghEvteQJVfa0raqDqgDFavfyQBsRsS8XFdi5wbHDg3QXNMXd1pHHBfmjg 40/+xDPGmvFV6YV/qd7H56Za0NlfbaEEVdDrsFg9OdBRdzWC3xH3JuOs9/mlTQ5ByoKV dfyg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=OVTA4G5a8BaOhZyIDZLXeXAeFjDe+nWW+bAR7srJHPU=; b=emZLP68N8R+Ozw1hDPJuGsTS02X7a+eqiIhtEWperYL/zInH8ZnYG8RonoLagr4JSS sCjHL7cgMpTwedipn3KJbbcjsOxcGPJO3S/EKKEj7Ru3cWS/lm7KqBjt3k4vYkINdz3v a/KjGunyJM8RfWBIZjPaCnU9QRdoYAOHBI30g8sE9GAuq7UznqN0vwnQMNYq+K4kucT5 A1oFgmFMQgMeVZETfmt5Hu8KTbLTUKs6Vc+5BkdqDhJ8iobY3GHjZ5Xm5iRyHOzrjzej o6T1kxI2qOqEo8gHkzGQtBaf4hfNefQwTUR1yfh0IfVEe0nqlf9dkjAwVRDxu2Vrxzgf JHyg== X-Received: by 10.50.108.174 with SMTP id hl14mr1110297igb.5.1359401574638; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:32:54 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.207.33 with SMTP id lt1ls1984507igc.1.gmail; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:32:53 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.50.181.233 with SMTP id dz9mr7018566igc.1.1359401573031; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:32:53 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.50.181.233 with SMTP id dz9mr7018565igc.1.1359401573016; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:32:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-oa0-f48.google.com (mail-oa0-f48.google.com [209.85.219.48]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d5si864639iga.1.2013.01.28.11.32.52 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:32:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.48 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.219.48; Received: by mail-oa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id h2so3172893oag.35 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:32:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.171.133 with SMTP id au5mr9339401oec.13.1359401572811; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:32:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.178.237 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:32:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.178.237 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:32:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130128135022.GK20956@samsa.fritz.box> References: <1696426.fuu6unn560@caracal> <47fd82fb-126d-41a3-aa58-fca6ab2fdbde@googlegroups.com> <20130128102447.GH20956@samsa.fritz.box> <567c078e-13fa-45c1-b22d-c57a45eed8af@googlegroups.com> <20130128125103.GI20956@samsa.fritz.box> <20130128135022.GK20956@samsa.fritz.box> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:32:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Aesop's "The Wolf and the Crane" From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.48 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54fae3adac46204d45e5728 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --bcaec54fae3adac46204d45e5728 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Jan 28, 2013 6:50 AM, "v4hn" wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 06:21:33AM -0700, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:51 AM, v4hn wrote: > > > Yes, {lo broda} _refers_ to any object that brodas, but it does not > > > share the _intensional meaning_ of "any object that brodas"! > > > {lo broda} refers to specific individuals /in the universe of discourse/ > > > > > > > No it doesn't. {lo} is the generic article. It cannot be specific, period. > > If it doesn't refer to(and maybe introduce) a specific element _in the universe > of discourse_(I'm not talking about the actual world) then there would be no > way you could reference that same element later on. Not even by KOhA/BY. > Because then, there would not _be_ anything you could refer to. period. > You're welcome to explain yourself in more than one sentence and with > at least one example. UD or IRL, it amounts to the same thing. When you say {lo mlatu}, you aren't talking about anything specific. It is the generic article because it is /generic/. {lo mlatu} means "one or more things which actually are a cat". The only way that becomes a reference to a specific thing is if context (or the UD, if you prefer,) limits the reference to a specific referent. I'm going to assume that when you say specific, you don't mean what I do when I say specific, because otherwise you're just not making any sense. When I say "specific", I mean "a particular instance of X, wherein X is the subject of discussion, such as 'cats'." > I still think some people should write a paper on usage and meaning of > {le} and {lo}, so we would have something specific to discuss instead of > listening over and over again to the same arguments until one side goes > to sleep... > > > v4hn -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --bcaec54fae3adac46204d45e5728 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1


On Jan 28, 2013 6:50 AM, "v4hn" <me@v4hn.de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 06:21:33AM -0700, Jonathan Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:51 AM, v4hn <me@v4hn.de> wrote:
> > > Yes, {lo broda} _refers_ to any object that brodas, but it does not
> > > share the _intensional meaning_ of "any object that brodas"!
> > > {lo broda} refers to specific individuals /in the universe of discourse/
> > >
> >
> > No it doesn't. {lo} is the generic article. It cannot be specific, period.
>
> If it doesn't refer to(and maybe introduce) a specific element _in the universe
> of discourse_(I'm not talking about the actual world) then there would be no
> way you could reference that same element later on. Not even by KOhA/BY.
> Because then, there would not _be_ anything you could refer to. period.
> You're welcome to explain yourself in more than one sentence and with
> at least one example.

UD or IRL, it amounts to the same thing. When you say {lo mlatu}, you aren't talking about anything specific. It is the generic article because it is /generic/.

{lo mlatu} means "one or more things which actually are a cat". The only way that becomes a reference to a specific thing is if context (or the UD, if you prefer,) limits the reference to a specific referent.

I'm going to assume that when you say specific, you don't mean what I do when I say specific, because otherwise you're just not making any sense.

When I say "specific", I mean "a particular instance of X, wherein X is the subject of discussion, such as 'cats'."

> I still think some people should write a paper on usage and meaning of
> {le} and {lo}, so we would have something specific to discuss instead of
> listening over and over again to the same arguments until one side goes
> to sleep...
>
>
> v4hn

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
--bcaec54fae3adac46204d45e5728--