Received: from mail-ie0-f191.google.com ([209.85.223.191]:49556) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1U40xG-0004Wj-3c; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 19:18:28 -0800 Received: by mail-ie0-f191.google.com with SMTP id c10sf1373104ieb.8 for ; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 19:18:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=yzAdoN7KXGoqyJ0azb2q5E72hr7xkWAgxekxA9Wn8BU=; b=ub4lUu/TdkLCWXFma+oByo8LF+ia1azCsstpBj0OWKzkZo7URIJEnMOap/KKRd0smq X+9jKxb6ijNR7b8xX4k881HTOGKkKh7vuobTJbVWZHG3QEEF1Rh/L3Exsdx9sfZZVIXN PlIUxXB7EKOQUuQpt6YDYZ0vxVnnrzdaqmyBxCZVhYR2rYccWfNsv/NDoZasJs7z6Cde JsxcKmS0Z3pp/IahTrotHb8BGIkVCUgF8P8GOALILSd3eeVkSTm+cu1eajgotFMrbr1c T4QYe3zRhBunkLOQdAbSJwHxplKpHRAs8vB9gjIPavUP4L7B2JYHcgA0prNRWZjA6N8Y o42A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=yzAdoN7KXGoqyJ0azb2q5E72hr7xkWAgxekxA9Wn8BU=; b=vmfcyVa7BUa4UhblltLLgA6i2qCg8Hl41kINuTHGIt0CpZe7LcPJwHwR1EtG1gEfrm /vKbAp/CZx0Cu9AQcQWLPCITyvWa4Ml6GvE7c+h4CSKTGAx4TVy396+pWT8spCwoc7fF PU7rNfbvw/Qts8Mzcs+eT4yqQYzJfuaDQkRKMcXgWtRtB84SJ8In7UHn2kxUXAQnkPub VPwf30K6dHhqqNA6i6tUh1r/CDvqSuu5P3qZnCP6q9MMxXspD81ogQVGiT4j6u8ryT42 b9JXGFSZiaX+25n/3gN/dcIFr9blUctyb3myBCDtDI13j1wU0yM2QyeJCg9wxiSnw+WT 8DdA== X-Received: by 10.50.34.167 with SMTP id a7mr233383igj.5.1360379890529; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 19:18:10 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.217.164 with SMTP id oz4ls963560igc.26.canary; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 19:18:09 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.42.215.203 with SMTP id hf11mr5730802icb.17.1360379889452; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 19:18:09 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.42.215.203 with SMTP id hf11mr5730801icb.17.1360379889430; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 19:18:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ob0-f177.google.com (mail-ob0-f177.google.com [209.85.214.177]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d5si959905iga.1.2013.02.08.19.18.09 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Feb 2013 19:18:09 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.177 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.177; Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id wc18so4511578obb.22 for ; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 19:18:09 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.182.73.67 with SMTP id j3mr5754321obv.102.1360379889089; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 19:18:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.78.35 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 19:17:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <84d88820-8c7d-436b-a0cc-222666747afd@googlegroups.com> <2625542.LcrIRrlWQu@caracal> From: Jacob Errington Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 22:17:48 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] strange behaviour of {cortu} To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: nictytan@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.177 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nictytan@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0445187b0c7d3a04d5422064 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --f46d0445187b0c7d3a04d5422064 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 8 February 2013 02:21, la gleki wrote: > > The "problem" appeared when i tried to translate the following sentence > from Tatoeba. > > "My back hurts." > > If we assume that back is {bekpi} (cuz Robin needed a gismu for it) > then we have three options. > > 1. mi cortu lo bekpi > 2. cortu lo bekpi be mi > 3. mi cortu lo bekpi be mi > > The third solution is verbose and therefore doesn't reflect relations > between sumti in a nice way. > I guess Lojban is just unable to express this in a more concise way. > May be > 4. bekpi je selcortu mi ? > > I wish I could bind {bekpi} and {selcortu} with {du} but I can't. > > I created a semi-serious solution to this problem when it first occurred to me too. I propose using a property + an indirect question as a verbose albeit consistent system: {.i mi cortu lo ka [makau] bekpi [ce'u]}. My rationale for disapproving of concrete sumti in this case is the same as my rationale for disapproving of events in kakne2: you should be able to use any concrete sumti (or event in the case of kakne2) but you can't because bullshit. (Indeed {mi kakne lo nu do citka lo plise} is nonsense.) This extends to any case where you have a concrete sumti with the restriction that it is intrinsically tied to another sumti. e.g. {mi bajra fi lo ka makau jubme ce'u} Naturally, we can use tanru (and jvajvo!) to make these formulas shorter. {mi bekpi cortu}. .i mi'e la tsani mu'o -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --f46d0445187b0c7d3a04d5422064 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 8 February 2013 02:21, la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:

The "problem" appeare= d when i tried to translate the following sentence from Tatoeba.=A0

"My back hurts."

If we= assume that back is {bekpi} (cuz Robin needed a gismu for it)
then we have three options.

1. mi cortu lo be= kpi
2. cortu lo bekpi be mi
3. mi cortu lo bekpi be mi<= /div>

The third solution is verbose and therefore doesn&= #39;t reflect relations between sumti in a nice way.
I guess Lojban is just unable to express this in a more concise way.
May be
4. bekpi je selcortu mi ?

I wish I could bind {bekpi} and {selcortu} with {du} but I can't.=


I created a semi-serious solution to this problem = when it first occurred to me too. I propose using a property + an indirect = question as a verbose albeit consistent system: {.i mi cortu lo ka [makau] = bekpi [ce'u]}.
My rationale for disapproving of concrete sumti in this case is the sa= me as my rationale for disapproving of events in kakne2: you should be able= to use any concrete sumti (or event in the case of kakne2) but you can'= ;t because bullshit. (Indeed {mi kakne lo nu do citka lo plise} is nonsense= .)
This extends to any case where you have a concrete sumti with the rest= riction that it is intrinsically tied to another sumti.
e.g. {mi = bajra fi lo ka makau jubme ce'u}
Naturally, we can use tanru = (and jvajvo!) to make these formulas shorter. {mi bekpi cortu}.

.i mi'e la tsani mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
--f46d0445187b0c7d3a04d5422064--