Received: from mail-qa0-f56.google.com ([209.85.216.56]:63245)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncBCD6T3EC2UIBBHUF3KEAKGQEIZQDQYQ@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1U4Dv4-0001PT-Na; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 09:09:04 -0800
Received: by mail-qa0-f56.google.com with SMTP id dx4sf672766qab.21
        for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 09:08:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf
         :mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results
         :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id
         :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=UKsqvEkfl4ShtoaFNyPSqu6pzToJBIDjMbbVInCdelg=;
        b=f7F/x5zIZqZ8bT2AUX10lWR4AJfQk8qsJkz25/Jx43NbS732mmxTjzx2b/xh4JtBXK
         Yi0lyg/NYZxfUDFxqQ4AddF0X5KNoD538v4p6eDm0jNEVgs82Kd0X8uHjSEeUPtSbXjX
         RQOH3q7BN3r4/LO565MpPym7rt6F3LNZhg+vMF4XT+phbx3DTkkkIILyC+0pXaEIfAf2
         GwmFV1YrU2BHcnUiP8TiV5MzEE96u1WSdW+QtiwlmqypPsr+222vOEpR7w6FM2Pb8asF
         Wf0WDcMoSprjQCqwA7Sf9J3Y4Kj8wtu7ED3YE3/CztOa3kIBwon+H8cApbgYXt/Rgn1b
         79sA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf
         :mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results
         :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id
         :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=UKsqvEkfl4ShtoaFNyPSqu6pzToJBIDjMbbVInCdelg=;
        b=XDluKfVYcURUv01zMPsaGoza/SGmNC3ZqFw8bb2ouch4N+QOupUtbLNXyfJ0/nQmj+
         AyAiQdxu7iRJ2pTdpsBgc5Fh2S+ILmc8Q0+6PkXhLPNhxJKkXDZthjtd3taZwnKt7Ni0
         bE5cK/flwP6il/d9VC0GuWmrVvJE5lWL2slluIrXVMLUmMO3Ialfx/jXum3SSQHDDOO5
         1wqYlHuohFlJq2TvrdvX6YVhoQcIoxOlRPv7sgs6kYDgDFGky6/MeS49hLCiosgyMRLC
         acPnGXK362Hv8ybzrfrYLBitanLUTwPqWiaNsV91otM6pSYW6uH331/XerY8BhXRUbLP
         PcWA==
X-Received: by 10.50.47.134 with SMTP id d6mr292285ign.0.1360429727173;
        Sat, 09 Feb 2013 09:08:47 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.50.5.175 with SMTP id t15ls1123588igt.33.canary; Sat, 09 Feb
 2013 09:08:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.42.23.5 with SMTP id q5mr7051957icb.21.1360429726479;
        Sat, 09 Feb 2013 09:08:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.42.23.5 with SMTP id q5mr7051956icb.21.1360429726467;
        Sat, 09 Feb 2013 09:08:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ia0-x22e.google.com (ia-in-x022e.1e100.net [2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22e])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id vz3si243005igb.0.2013.02.09.09.08.46
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Sat, 09 Feb 2013 09:08:46 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of felipeg.assis@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22e as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22e;
Received: by mail-ia0-f174.google.com with SMTP id o25so5289561iad.33
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 09:08:46 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.169.6 with SMTP id aa6mr8162425igc.1.1360429726360; Sat,
 09 Feb 2013 09:08:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.231.177.1 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 09:08:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <0c6ecd5d-9e9b-4180-b719-c92d16a4bdfa@googlegroups.com>
References: <84d88820-8c7d-436b-a0cc-222666747afd@googlegroups.com>
	<2625542.LcrIRrlWQu@caracal>
	<b1e592c6-c230-4f1a-88b6-41f10f9bdf44@googlegroups.com>
	<CAOQ8VDW8Ah8bbzOODw6RJdcn7V9Bt4+xruUYr3LQKv27aRhALQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<d4e903ba-dcca-4624-9ba2-a03a5d3922c1@googlegroups.com>
	<CALMa68oixSyyPSzw6F6QYvV3Ou5eHFGTRmC9SdvQ-ZW0rjX_zw@mail.gmail.com>
	<0c6ecd5d-9e9b-4180-b719-c92d16a4bdfa@googlegroups.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 14:08:46 -0300
Message-ID: <CALMa68oatkKomMYh0tgdxf17Xbw-cKWd4_9E3HJ4W9SZY=g5Aw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] strange behaviour of {cortu}
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Felipe_Gon=E7alves_Assis?= <felipeg.assis@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: felipeg.assis@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=pass
 (google.com: domain of felipeg.assis@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22e
 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=felipeg.assis@gmail.com;       dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

On 9 February 2013 13:50, la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Saturday, February 9, 2013 6:21:29 PM UTC+4, .asiz. wrote:
>>
>> I still don't see the problem. And, while I agree with most of tsani's
>> stance on use
>> of abstractions, I think he went too far here. The locus of pain IS a
>> concrete object,
>> and the fact that it is usually described with a part-whole relation
>> doesn't mean that
>> it has to be always like that. Consider
>>   {mi cortu lo xunre}
>>
>
> Well, he said he was semi-serious. Next, IMO this is not lojban but a
> dialect of it. Lastly, this shows how this problem could be solved.
>

Again, I don't see the problem. Restricting cortu2 to involve a part-of-body
relation would be a problem. The current {mi cortu lo xunre}, {mi cortu ti},
{mi cortu lo se janli} wouldn't be easily expressible, just to mention the
first few that come up to my mind.

> I can't say that I like such solution, it's a bit awkward but shows the
> idea.
>

Non-problem, non-solution.

mu'o
mi'e .asiz.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.