Received: from mail-wi0-f183.google.com ([209.85.212.183]:64208) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1U6ivb-0002l5-1x; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 06:39:55 -0800 Received: by mail-wi0-f183.google.com with SMTP id hi18sf445124wib.20 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 06:39:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=lzFTQmg1ZIJHYSQnhY1ue4wV7AUyPX/1Bkbp/vj8FAU=; b=WcAH06/liuId2JMdzfS/EMF5R4VFBpU5qLwUBAM/N0xIH+bQ6XikErX4T2Xiz5tNFb edaJFaiQSaexMWjHSiFaJDz4se+pU3pWsvZWECAgRthQCqKvGRwERSXScdY8MwRWSV3r 2R5/4mvrLXuc4wvyblQVEQxJWL86sZCI2XjxF70BOvkalEoCO6HnVXVAx0mUBhQ9pjho DcMP9ctdaaued00WJO4ClZimPxIUJ7i2cRfOiTsBA3DpU/NZUjSLPYXSedjx6j6SYQRJ JsMF9C4q7WQ2wdbZzKrKG+XHp9P2G/cTOWNzI/sp1W1ljaEFr0pQ/O6a36YdOQLDo6N0 gJEw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=lzFTQmg1ZIJHYSQnhY1ue4wV7AUyPX/1Bkbp/vj8FAU=; b=gVl4Y7FeIDOUP3sRGVG0hLh016ydmTXyXQP+CdlT9/pdO5EawjjxG46TA2JtV6Yb9J 0aLEIVaCiEMgZrsq3zpDpj0eLrAAbCIS6H/ZwCXhnKP2hag0vbGrB2fioBxa+FI1Aah/ LRJDAiuFyHHJZYwO0OM2g7YLtoHNwM1hY4gYkEEHZyosSz7BgwKmxVqaHJwUCuyzoneZ uSy3+QNKihPxESeOK20eCXoF+iaQkc388veQNZkk+Aj2XWxPvvjVXuWDLo7/3g908gxX SXEOhe8/AlSGznZeR/uKYgtXoC30V20O3esqDM+2uU3UfjTIEdBMHAPj0KBEuQdIWy1L bfUQ== X-Received: by 10.180.107.135 with SMTP id hc7mr351311wib.1.1361025579484; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 06:39:39 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.86.70 with SMTP id n6ls201617wiz.54.canary; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 06:39:38 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.204.7.210 with SMTP id e18mr287799bke.4.1361025578316; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 06:39:38 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.204.7.210 with SMTP id e18mr287798bke.4.1361025578300; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 06:39:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lb0-f179.google.com (mail-lb0-f179.google.com [209.85.217.179]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i9si4324348bki.2.2013.02.16.06.39.38 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 16 Feb 2013 06:39:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.179 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.179; Received: by mail-lb0-f179.google.com with SMTP id j14so3309216lbo.10 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 06:39:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.27.106 with SMTP id s10mr3448410lbg.27.1361025577945; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 06:39:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.75.40 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 06:39:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20130216005511.GB10126@samsa.fritz.box> Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 11:39:37 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] srana zo za'o From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.179 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Jacob Errington wrote: > > As for "for too long", I believe that's the ideal gloss for {za'o}. All the > other ZAhO are about fundamentally temporal relations, and using them > otherwise is metaphorical at best. We have {fe'e} to convert temporal tenses > into spatial tenses, after all. I think "for too long" is worse than "still" as a gloss because "for too long" covers the whole interval of the event, while "za'o", like "still", only applies to the extended part. She slept for too long: the whole of her sleep lasted for too long. She was still sleeping: her sleeping was at the stage when it might have been expected that it would be over by then. "ko'a pu za'o sipna" is the latter, not the former. Indeed the former should more properly be done with a member of ZEhA (if there was one for "too long"), not of ZAhO. > As for incorrect uses of za'o as translating some instances of "still", > {ca'o} is usually better in my experience. I don't think "ca'o" ever really works for "still". "ko'a ca'o sipna" means "she is sleeping", it can't distinguish "she is still sleeping" from "she is already sleeping" for example. When looking at "za'o", it is useful to consider it together with its dual, "xa'o" (already). za'o = na xa'o na: "still"; "not yet not"; "any more", "any longer" (in questions) na za'o = xa'o na: "no longer", "not any more"; "already not" xa'o = na za'o na: "already"; "no longer not"; "yet" (in questons) na xa'o = za'o na: "not yet"; "still not" mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.