Received: from mail-qe0-f62.google.com ([209.85.128.62]:45314) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1U8veu-0000Rj-1M; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:39:47 -0800 Received: by mail-qe0-f62.google.com with SMTP id 3sf327627qea.27 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:39:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf:from:to :subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=foQZRNHJSU7162wCd8+zSJbmAc9BpkCvx54ZLQWIPFY=; b=pQl6wJ1j++ImomeHRjB0U3XqVTfAjwhAHol0Sz7sZFQd73aAeMK1I0ib2VVAhM3Ujj Rdb8FqvSPG7tRGTu5L6mU7q5wpJwIXlfmeXY/HfBT3W7zWw1oWi38YvJrLTeg3VenPDD xT3pVYkIomqJbrSFCRZn7/8zx3YYquUl65o3e/K2Tz3SxCSxLDebCUWHvem0ifMvva3Z TEcezpzkpEUbYmBu4ZaesB673sfLhRSs0UR+vEBYoz/GHhQj1W6h2nNJ3e1I85fgQ7E5 CFQuVJ7lGgqr+yoHQDs8f5xasX6QEvMkR1YqFBbr8VYpVWGNzv36qDnjtSNMMAjy5jwN +OzQ== X-Received: by 10.49.1.70 with SMTP id 6mr161696qek.27.1361551173269; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:39:33 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.47.69 with SMTP id b5ls277308qen.97.gmail; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:39:32 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.236.81.80 with SMTP id l56mr1339914yhe.16.1361551172912; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:39:32 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.236.81.80 with SMTP id l56mr1339913yhe.16.1361551172902; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:39:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from leopard.ixazon.lan (cpe-069-132-098-107.carolina.res.rr.com. [69.132.98.107]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id i65si292091yhh.5.2013.02.22.08.39.32; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:39:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 69.132.98.107 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) client-ip=69.132.98.107; Received: from caracal.localnet (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:8:42:8dc4:ff9c:1d35:11ca]) by leopard.ixazon.lan (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3BA3DCE for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:39:31 -0500 (EST) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] blood - jgina Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:39:31 -0500 Message-ID: <5648186.iH3FK2nHSh@caracal> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.5 (Linux/3.2.0-36-generic; KDE/4.8.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1361417143.16262.YahooMailNeo@web184403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> References: <2894081.qm3WGx4RNe@caracal> <20130220223130.GF3918@samsa.fritz.box> <1361417143.16262.YahooMailNeo@web184403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: phma@bezitopo.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 69.132.98.107 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) smtp.mail=phma@bezitopo.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 19:25:43 John E Clifford wrote: > [Ame]rind(o) Native American. It looks like an old word, but it is not in > any list I have. Many of those ethnic, culture words got made up and then > never used and this may be one -- or Pierre have made it up noncely today. > Carrying over the blood image is probably a bad idea, although doing it > totally literally is probably worse ("none of my genetic material is > derived from people of Native American heritage" or some such thing). Just > {mi na rindo} should cover it. It is an old word. I just entered it. mi na straixe .iku'i du'o le mi lanzu le mi mampafpatfu cu straixe .i.a'o mi baza cilre lo du'u lo straixe cu ckini mi fo la .relcibjolmib. On Thursday, February 21, 2013 23:46:06 Jacob Errington wrote: > {mi na rindo} is certainly *enough*, but it's not as unnecessarily complex > as "I have no Indian blood", I think. > I'd suggest maybe something like {.i mi se dzena no rindo}. That's good, but one could also say "na rindo jgina mi" or "no rindo cu jgina mi". That means that the genes I don't have are Indian, but not that they code for Indianness, which they don't. Pierre -- li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.