Received: from mail-lb0-f190.google.com ([209.85.217.190]:41857) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1U9hiM-0005bg-IW; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:58:35 -0800 Received: by mail-lb0-f190.google.com with SMTP id q12sf1043308lbc.27 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:58:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=+yQvp4O7i1C0hGUabctbNxw13vHe2FtwFpoUCxWitVM=; b=Tqf1y2iS5WOEYcf1GGoGj9FP/by2M/fBgbswcnWDs2pR9ib1ZpOs+T/gYkkWh+7rGO XOlovo/RucrdIDUKhUdKXeMUtOFS6DoTxCSRscHoaFH74/5DIEljyyhf0mg6v2RWaOKj krwkdtVboWnaanNheUPsYsj2+EpK6Fs9Lgm7LVHxzFKcYJNVPX4HxBONXc+GrEcn5K+R 4baPTXb1reT5xXwUlgxd2ewXsMPt7/NgQQlmMqIbDspS8i94rA2ndTCP4JLyD/OjXeVq bK4Q+1uih4qF4DgJj4R11I1FKtDlyNt8xLoSndBqxjKmc+cdrHaMGXJBSdcEMVRDtNW8 jHgQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=+yQvp4O7i1C0hGUabctbNxw13vHe2FtwFpoUCxWitVM=; b=e5OmgyDODxFQTIiEk3mxMjDfJcN1geHttFBi74AiyLF6yqV7y6tmoQbNfy61SrP7Ur zv2grTRU6IgE45gN99Z2HOd4GFveb4HZnJaC5tAkUEKyM6nAAMTPBDg69exx1Af7uJTI ibgR19MCtpDZY4JnquE5N6+cArMyXyowCiAgLFoBDnZYsdyy80mU7V110OhNW5WH+SzK J9DH4fx7mGOSD3if9m/9AxB9NgEjVohhg/R2c30mceneJZatJ67MKWliCLBa5kHeyXRn +d2BKneGiu0MrezFOdkSpIplgnPjfXZjzOdkPr6nf4j1R/6OrPbpwawSvfHKKbyJnu3n H5qw== X-Received: by 10.180.92.33 with SMTP id cj1mr501467wib.18.1361735898306; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:58:18 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.88.69 with SMTP id be5ls356322wib.41.canary; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:58:16 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.204.7.81 with SMTP id c17mr820346bkc.2.1361735896843; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:58:16 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.204.7.81 with SMTP id c17mr820345bkc.2.1361735896822; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:58:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-la0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14si784457bky.0.2013.02.24.11.58.16 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:58:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b; Received: by mail-la0-f43.google.com with SMTP id ek20so2067267lab.30 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:58:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.27.106 with SMTP id s10mr3548335lbg.27.1361735896438; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:58:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.75.40 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:58:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 16:58:16 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Compositional Self-Reflexive Lujvo From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Jacob Errington wrote: > These are impossible to make, due to the lack of a selbri meaning "x1 is in > all the ce'u-places of function x2". So I decided today, in IRC, to make > that selbri. This is the documentation of my quest. Wouldn't "x1 is in the two ce'u-places of function x2" be more useful, for lujvo making purposes? > With this selbri, it is now possible to create compositional self-reflexive > lujvo: > {.i mi cinba zei sevzike} = {.i mi sevzike lo ka ce'u ce'u cinba} = {.i mi > mi cinba}. Compositional up to a point, meaning "x1 kisses themself at locus x2", right? We know it's not "mi sevzike lo ka ce'u ce'u ce'u cinba" because of the semantics of "cinba". And if we wanted to create a lujvo meaning "x1 is self-serving in action x2", would "selfu zei sevzike" work, for similar reasons? I find it hard to find an example where we would want a function with other than 2 places in the x2 of sevzike to make a useful lujvo. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.