Received: from mail-ye0-f192.google.com ([209.85.213.192]:49826) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UDVzs-00012B-MZ; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:16:24 -0800 Received: by mail-ye0-f192.google.com with SMTP id r11sf96162yen.19 for ; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:16:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf:from:to :subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=y/YbW9nN1w6grxMEY7jgP23oCpYbJ3+N2DyG1xdNGCw=; b=JjlaNtsjH0y/70YatrMYX8oqLG5SGwbF9GkMyZg83W7SJ8tgnUV8lJkFHdoiac4J7O CJOJ/zaCm2hZNjW6JmAS5jrscNo8G/V41HlCrcu90P0QYgjpTWCtsPrmOzalsxgLRngx ov5wOTxPlwuX6gU90LHf+SRuxH66coS25VCodLY6dWXImfzK4Y3XmkmNxBdHZ7QYJsPk yZYo9jOblqN9WLb5OWacdfEiVhSQLzEmEwWeUs//QYbtE81T4NUO+NGWK2DBjwk03JNE pM1A1a5F7Wm55vV4clK42LqTP13aSEwQ1gcI9YqKeGZMFz89xY8j6Tt2VjONed/iahej RkqA== X-Received: by 10.49.75.195 with SMTP id e3mr3303667qew.24.1362644170054; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:16:10 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.127.227 with SMTP id nj3ls2627444qeb.77.gmail; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:16:08 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.236.80.6 with SMTP id j6mr19800638yhe.56.1362644168637; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:16:08 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.236.80.6 with SMTP id j6mr19800637yhe.56.1362644168624; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:16:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from leopard.ixazon.lan (cpe-069-132-098-107.carolina.res.rr.com. [69.132.98.107]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id f47si45520yhg.4.2013.03.07.00.16.08; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:16:08 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 69.132.98.107 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) client-ip=69.132.98.107; Received: from caracal.localnet (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:8:42:f54e:331b:2216:ba6]) by leopard.ixazon.lan (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6052BD0E for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 03:16:07 -0500 (EST) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] jbovlaste doesn't want to accept some fuhivla Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 03:16:06 -0500 Message-ID: <1993133.NSvoV0VJ9D@caracal> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.5 (Linux/3.2.0-36-generic; KDE/4.8.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: phma@bezitopo.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 69.132.98.107 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) smtp.mail=phma@bezitopo.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 20:50:47 la gleki wrote: > Strange suggestion. If a word is possible in Lojban why shouldn't it be in > jvs? And if a word isn't possible in Lojban why jvs can accept it? > Waiting for jvs to be fixed is another technical question. > Do you mean we should just wait for someone to fix jvs or do you suggest > avoiding such words forever? Jbovlaste uses vlatai (part of the no-longer-maintained jbofi'e suite) to decide whether a word is valid. Jbofi'e has some bugs (it does not accept "martio", "prilio", "madjio", "djunio", "djulio", or "damskrima", the last being someone's attempt at "eskrima" or "dambrskrima") and some disagreements with camxes (it does accept "tarksako") Camxes accepts "ried" but not "cried" as a syllable. Thus "bacriedgo" is syllabified as "bac,ried,go", but "criedgo" fails. The rules are looser for cmevla; camxes accepts "kriofl" but rejects "kriofla". (Which annoys me a bit, as I use the stuff in my henna mix and don't know what else to call it in Lojban. Camxes doesn't accept "kri'ofla", because it's a slinku'i.) I had an argument with Nick Nicholas years ago. I said "fasxolarto", thinking at the time that "rkt" within a word was invalid, and he didn't recognize it, but would have recognized "fasxolarkto". When I wrote valfendi, I considered "fasxolarkto" valid. Camxes considers it invalid. Another corner case is "aierne". I suggest "ai'erne" as a camxes-compatible variant. Pierre -- ve ka'a ro klaji la .romas. se jmaji -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.