Received: from mail-qa0-f64.google.com ([209.85.216.64]:55502) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UDWbo-0001Ne-8s; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:55:45 -0800 Received: by mail-qa0-f64.google.com with SMTP id cr7sf123967qab.29 for ; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:55:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=h/SDo/UtkJs4GMAg04pD7xmP9nnoxuHo8dl91rcK7Yk=; b=tSMIcFfhW5uXLEibpk/RfcLdYkkmnihHVhxQuWoKTEfw1LtT6zmEMgjhY7FaT/Rvah 30dtdpKhTiz4v/LpmYG/Q6rA4zamHwcDEuui+/o1KYeP7qSrw02LEvdmec07hwRcOHzF wc0oxJH6zfysEKuzLfSvRNEkQXGNOTcLU/4DDgxuuBdVwnAhQCDueJbUDQDW+rzy/Mti KsoFwAsTC+S9MFI503+g5zsyPAa1GfUxGCIf9oFLwZoV7HlYSuaduEMoDfTjM0H7wyeS G5727KsrbeS0VBOJHg/XZx7YSNjVZCSerJt6Hnl4pKMOUYRpsb3VDUt+m6W+JecfDBr5 Pg2g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=h/SDo/UtkJs4GMAg04pD7xmP9nnoxuHo8dl91rcK7Yk=; b=Y3Z5yaG2vG9DPUXD7r6lhh7+HtwUqDh8RdkJxcyiJ6kiuWxi82p88xzhNF2edUVyXl ZygY7rptv4YgXVlrHydGmABakLqHyKM05UIJvdaujRs5d/KO135q85E4u27/lay013RT 9Z2wbSPh1hkZ2Pwxl64FGTV/5+4nVKLOnx8bEb5YNhxFroaT1GVDGKcM+6gBdm7ZyzoC xLqF8ZmW8tphDJqFIwvFr+B5AUmSxwN/xTsdnCOKef1GGSd2ZnFeX2MQDt2wRpBoTiAh Lrd5lRBrA1XqPaJ96Tv/OW1BW6AG3TpP7ZuH7hhtzEOBU+uZQ7q5GqgKHLO+iVnrjEQ+ i2uQ== X-Received: by 10.49.71.135 with SMTP id v7mr3395840qeu.28.1362646521151; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:55:21 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.0.102 with SMTP id 6ls3084259qed.24.gmail; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:55:19 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.49.30.100 with SMTP id r4mr3191305qeh.32.1362646519769; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:55:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 00:55:19 -0800 (PST) From: la gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <1993133.NSvoV0VJ9D@caracal> References: <1993133.NSvoV0VJ9D@caracal> Subject: Re: [lojban] jbovlaste doesn't want to accept some fuhivla MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_355_26558438.1362646519415" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_355_26558438.1362646519415 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thursday, March 7, 2013 12:16:06 PM UTC+4, Pierre Abbat wrote: > > On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 20:50:47 la gleki wrote: > > Strange suggestion. If a word is possible in Lojban why shouldn't it be > in > > jvs? And if a word isn't possible in Lojban why jvs can accept it? > > Waiting for jvs to be fixed is another technical question. > > Do you mean we should just wait for someone to fix jvs or do you suggest > > avoiding such words forever? > > Jbovlaste uses vlatai (part of the no-longer-maintained jbofi'e suite) to > decide whether a word is valid. Jbofi'e has some bugs (it does not accept > "martio", "prilio", "madjio", "djunio", "djulio", or "damskrima", the last > being someone's attempt at "eskrima" or "dambrskrima") and some > disagreements > with camxes (it does accept "tarksako") > > Camxes accepts "ried" but not "cried" as a syllable. Thus "bacriedgo" is > syllabified as "bac,ried,go", but "criedgo" fails. The rules are looser > for > cmevla; camxes accepts "kriofl" but rejects "kriofla". (Which annoys me a > bit, > as I use the stuff in my henna mix and don't know what else to call it in > Lojban. Camxes doesn't accept "kri'ofla", because it's a slinku'i.) > > I had an argument with Nick Nicholas years ago. I said "fasxolarto", > thinking > at the time that "rkt" within a word was invalid, and he didn't recognize > it, > but would have recognized "fasxolarkto". When I wrote valfendi, I > considered > "fasxolarkto" valid. Camxes considers it invalid. > > Another corner case is "aierne". I suggest "ai'erne" as a > camxes-compatible > variant. > Pardon, so to say in short do you mean that camxes is not the standard? > > Pierre > -- > ve ka'a ro klaji la .romas. se jmaji > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_355_26558438.1362646519415 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thursday, March 7, 2013 12:16:06 PM UTC+4, Pierre Abbat wrote:On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 20:= 50:47 la gleki wrote:
> Strange suggestion. If a word is possible in Lojban why shouldn't = it be in
> jvs? And if a word isn't possible in Lojban why jvs can accept it?
> Waiting for jvs to be fixed is another technical question.
> Do you mean we should just wait for someone to fix jvs or do you s= uggest
> avoiding such words forever?

Jbovlaste uses vlatai (part of the no-longer-maintained jbofi'e suite) = to=20
decide whether a word is valid. Jbofi'e has some bugs (it does not acce= pt=20
"martio", "prilio", "madjio", "djunio", "djulio", or "damskrima", the l= ast=20
being someone's attempt at "eskrima" or "dambrskrima") and some disagre= ements=20
with camxes (it does accept "tarksako")

Camxes accepts "ried" but not "cried" as a syllable. Thus "bacriedgo" i= s=20
syllabified as "bac,ried,go", but "criedgo" fails. The rules are looser= for=20
cmevla; camxes accepts "kriofl" but rejects "kriofla". (Which annoys me= a bit,=20
as I use the stuff in my henna mix and don't know what else to call it = in=20
Lojban. Camxes doesn't accept "kri'ofla", because it's a slinku'i.)

I had an argument with Nick Nicholas years ago. I said "fasxolarto", th= inking=20
at the time that "rkt" within a word was invalid, and he didn't recogni= ze it,=20
but would have recognized "fasxolarkto". When I wrote valfendi, I consi= dered=20
"fasxolarkto" valid. Camxes considers it invalid.

Another corner case is "aierne". I suggest "ai'erne" as a camxes-compat= ible=20
variant.


Pardon, so to say in sh= ort do you mean that camxes is not the standard?
 

Pierre
--=20
ve ka'a ro klaji la .romas. se jmaji

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
------=_Part_355_26558438.1362646519415--