Received: from mail-vc0-f188.google.com ([209.85.220.188]:47225) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UDYHR-00029v-Hx; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 02:42:50 -0800 Received: by mail-vc0-f188.google.com with SMTP id p16sf138302vcq.15 for ; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 02:42:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf:from:to :subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=tF6Vh2m0NORZAF7baW+s4LdDEHJO7t/XezMasj1sRas=; b=dHI8CV8gc1VxbpDS6O4sKuuHFEDYKjhsF0AwMKh5PppQuoq11MsOgK/gpZRqjzjkZn YCnVdj/JaZvvoqaq5hJTpy0z6u6wqnUIhWiVF+wIB54n297Daz/pNaSyGHv0vpE6EYCL PI6HjU/6zpv1lEfGdG+lsEgPqtL3FjBYx5JGRT1W1ERszcQ+V6ysBkdyFNWc/HCBakne gffhiaR1wblmDUmbH90WdomIKRWBatI5jl7pzTzXtTNQ3giz8/TmQsIb72HnR6G9TyVF 2M3LsrgOsB2VyCsCJRthLMC5o6KDB3bSbAeEzGAJEAwYySOfPUyqcDJSjbPserkVc8VV 7exA== X-Received: by 10.49.71.50 with SMTP id r18mr1458096qeu.26.1362652940648; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 02:42:20 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.37.198 with SMTP id a6ls3259420qek.42.gmail; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 02:42:19 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.236.110.84 with SMTP id t60mr19444921yhg.50.1362652939339; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 02:42:19 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.236.110.84 with SMTP id t60mr19444920yhg.50.1362652939328; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 02:42:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from leopard.ixazon.lan ([2001:470:8:42:ada8:848c:d55c:f8ce]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id b67si69483yhi.2.2013.03.07.02.42.19; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 02:42:19 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 2001:470:8:42:ada8:848c:d55c:f8ce is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) client-ip=2001:470:8:42:ada8:848c:d55c:f8ce; Received: from caracal.localnet (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:8:42:f54e:331b:2216:ba6]) by leopard.ixazon.lan (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91854DEA for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 05:42:18 -0500 (EST) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] jbovlaste doesn't want to accept some fuhivla Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 05:42:17 -0500 Message-ID: <1775852.k8IIq1qYmY@caracal> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.5 (Linux/3.2.0-36-generic; KDE/4.8.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1993133.NSvoV0VJ9D@caracal> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: phma@bezitopo.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 2001:470:8:42:ada8:848c:d55c:f8ce is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) smtp.mail=phma@bezitopo.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 1 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Thursday, March 07, 2013 00:55:19 la gleki wrote: > Pardon, so to say in short do you mean that camxes is not the standard? Jbofi'e was written before camxes existed, and there have been differences in interpretation of some unclear morphological or phonotactical passages in the CLL. [...] Content analysis details: (0.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid On Thursday, March 07, 2013 00:55:19 la gleki wrote: > Pardon, so to say in short do you mean that camxes is not the standard? Jbofi'e was written before camxes existed, and there have been differences in interpretation of some unclear morphological or phonotactical passages in the CLL. Pierre -- gau do li'i co'e kei do -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.