Received: from mail-qa0-f64.google.com ([209.85.216.64]:41696) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UDYk2-0002Nh-7C; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 03:12:14 -0800 Received: by mail-qa0-f64.google.com with SMTP id cr7sf172490qab.19 for ; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 03:11:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=JFiquXEeh95crDsr5DgyeQB75aQ3xF7Z0TjcGUYMyEk=; b=G4rCAO81eAxcfdWPIIxZYvKaQe7ZSPMkR0cXR8y0RVUjnEUjGzrBlDNwiwuckaLLrL nuLGq9E7+xlxg+s3zwgFUSHecd4EjoTVRDys7KveQQJnTcOdpZTuk1dM5eSdjTBMweEf jKk6dDD4VGBgtj8zSRMOuNqhEdHZeOEzXM93la8kCiuBlMAOX33z75P3Hg5g+p4NkPdI M1OtYqe8/rYjSPC/p/0E13bjLkIYWrrkNMJAkQzaokWBJcnS//LIoLfKs6smQSG+aB7q XjiAO0o7WMt7ZjHMmG27pvWOgrpdqQ0SR+09209+skE8I7T7Hf55QcZatXtBf4Nhj4FH pxxw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=JFiquXEeh95crDsr5DgyeQB75aQ3xF7Z0TjcGUYMyEk=; b=EnQNTfCc4W4iohGso0nCe2HGTZD1s3Y7BWx0+QnAv6/sIqxJ2PHKy3aF6mpVYB5zWT gH+REwUj4GzJfRmnrOFWGd0B6LKG9RV77JRJ50jYQ/++XaqZvjJl5dCEfDusQX7fH1Vj AwNxbxPYlxzrFFJTaGghD09QibOpMqQSrcoGNy8cI+kptRYwgwwp2U34A3bFo+p6H+Tz fgtIIJt8nvmuw3V/2y9btIxWLDQOFuyiJMqDJ6FvssPtEqR2/9tGsygmDkKY3yYFwVop 7EBq9vSt7MFjzk69zmVxKwXqE+zbKqa+5gFDJFJFZ2MfJpyvFb41rcqBofhB6U4xpfMC VU+Q== X-Received: by 10.49.1.70 with SMTP id 6mr3352728qek.27.1362654719180; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 03:11:59 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.134.35 with SMTP id ph3ls2402190qeb.63.gmail; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 03:11:57 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.49.71.135 with SMTP id v7mr3415831qeu.28.1362654717659; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 03:11:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 03:11:57 -0800 (PST) From: la gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <4cbd98c4-dea2-4f19-9438-e6e1411485b1@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <1775852.k8IIq1qYmY@caracal> References: <1993133.NSvoV0VJ9D@caracal> <1775852.k8IIq1qYmY@caracal> Subject: Re: [lojban] jbovlaste doesn't want to accept some fuhivla MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_871_14779398.1362654717240" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_871_14779398.1362654717240 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thursday, March 7, 2013 2:42:17 PM UTC+4, Pierre Abbat wrote: > > On Thursday, March 07, 2013 00:55:19 la gleki wrote: > > Pardon, so to say in short do you mean that camxes is not the standard? > > Jbofi'e was written before camxes existed, and there have been differences > in > interpretation of some unclear morphological or phonotactical passages in > the > CLL. > I understand the history of the question. I m just wondering about technical issues and the *current* policy. When adding a word to jvs should we all consult both jbofi'e and camxes every time so that the word is acceptable in both apps? Otherwise why adding words that are not compatible with camxes? > > Pierre > -- > gau do li'i co'e kei do > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_871_14779398.1362654717240 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thursday, March 7, 2013 2:42:17 PM UTC+4, Pierre Abbat wrote:On Thursday, March 07, 2013 00:55= :19 la gleki wrote:
> Pardon, so to say in short do you mean that camxes is not the stan= dard?

Jbofi'e was written before camxes existed, and there have been differen= ces in=20
interpretation of some unclear morphological or phonotactical passages = in the=20
CLL.

I understand the history of the questi= on. I m just wondering about technical issues and the *current* policy.
When adding a word to jvs should we all consult both jbofi'e and cam= xes every time so that the word is acceptable in both apps?
Other= wise why adding words that are not compatible with camxes?

 

Pierre
--=20
gau do li'i co'e kei do

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
------=_Part_871_14779398.1362654717240--