Received: from mail-ea0-f185.google.com ([209.85.215.185]:63610) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UDZ1E-0002e7-Ni; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 03:30:06 -0800 Received: by mail-ea0-f185.google.com with SMTP id l10sf1160727eaa.22 for ; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 03:29:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=YcnkxXFz9DTW97D9bBLZAAnD/lLcFbJu5Knhle3BCKs=; b=NYes7VnjFvhjJZro+nfpkhgb+bpr3twU7RGmMx2m4gl01vALOXYaomAL/AN8hAC0bn gkqXwVm7P6zQaV9dYLWOSlBikaZPXoY3NjHrU32UDlDHJIsrLwrwNmSTLA18k4WcfS6w t5uYos49ve8eY53Og1ZhH4dWN9tpKm4RkR31YyW3ei85s7xJsh/mDBlkX6VvV8Yyac5y ffrb+C0dpw45MiOXOpftWwDGTphQ0i5AwMDWrfQMlT82aMWriBZGyiUVYhcv60cQtO7c xpeXyC3UTIrx4RzuA4/A+fc+Nnwsmlv2ZB/JGYu9QSiCdm5uYNQRJnS3OCSozMbuxVDv dzig== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=YcnkxXFz9DTW97D9bBLZAAnD/lLcFbJu5Knhle3BCKs=; b=xIAuUudc7MpJHh7D3J0LMRnmu0ERiA3VKPMS3T3EXbeOzPwf24fR4grnNRZo5GpJ+D gkKDc7KkxR9cX6tH2RYEOhTmD4n+9F7PGDX+NcCD5Ztmxn/Ne28DKhWKtgk8ZPn8V3IE ddx0wIMA7E4KgEq4csKEG+R+k5RpiS/2liuWSXqmnVr/YXtmNUI8wxEZqyKAPmRys0sn EUCse8r1wYk7R/QbjE0w8MIP/QFyLhcJDsepqKtl/nXCaaOZ7v67a0vyE7fAUMB24wpx 4dkP+k05nlQuRerWBUW0w9UhZxY66tRlyuxoQ8ZzhKHO/CTCr17tbc02iM0gn8vk9v9O bk7A== X-Received: by 10.180.184.84 with SMTP id es20mr1834752wic.5.1362655783110; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 03:29:43 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.74.52 with SMTP id q20ls554688wiv.30.canary; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 03:29:42 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.204.7.210 with SMTP id e18mr1654780bke.4.1362655782599; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 03:29:42 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.204.7.210 with SMTP id e18mr1654779bke.4.1362655782584; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 03:29:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-la0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s1si96510bkt.3.2013.03.07.03.29.42 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Mar 2013 03:29:42 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b; Received: by mail-la0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id ek20so337186lab.2 for ; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 03:29:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.110.6 with SMTP id hw6mr28419010lab.43.1362655782285; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 03:29:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.75.40 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 03:29:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4cbd98c4-dea2-4f19-9438-e6e1411485b1@googlegroups.com> References: <1993133.NSvoV0VJ9D@caracal> <1775852.k8IIq1qYmY@caracal> <4cbd98c4-dea2-4f19-9438-e6e1411485b1@googlegroups.com> Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 08:29:42 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] jbovlaste doesn't want to accept some fuhivla From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 8:11 AM, la gleki wrote: > > I understand the history of the question. I m just wondering about technical > issues and the *current* policy. > When adding a word to jvs should we all consult both jbofi'e and camxes > every time so that the word is acceptable in both apps? Ideally, people who coin fu'ivla should already be familiar with the morphology rules, so they wouldn't need to consult. In practice, yes, until all morphology issues have been settled and the jbovlaste's algorithm has been updated. I don't think you will find any discrepancies when it comes to lujvo, which is what most of jbovlaste consists of. > Otherwise why adding words that are not compatible with camxes? A few of the words already there are not compatible with camxes. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.