Received: from mail-ie0-f189.google.com ([209.85.223.189]:64474) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UDZLj-0002l5-1Z; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 03:51:10 -0800 Received: by mail-ie0-f189.google.com with SMTP id c13sf164024ieb.16 for ; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 03:50:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=/VAQpUmVIKXnHih1f88jQtcl5DU6b8RDUldwfQHlGdA=; b=P/CfsERzGa+XPiYd2Gs7lFm1glS1w5jGB+3VYp4tgZa9FbqXM6fW6imxJll95cYd2w DTlWYD7/MYjv/aq+BzYmppqeuuGxh2Fj41CdNgDmjVpOjHKyv2G3Je2ryDfISipQyPFB 72f4kuFITX4DDk6WdgVUEUzmRVinNXwRXEn8KWUteOhvlqtopUvd4GX+KTSIu9Pu/nzK anTfIssX86ItnIiVxUyoEBexAkZP2b/5PJnQNo241DoedtRSx0vy9J2XIowScVd+3XXp E/DxF5sXNRd25pZILQsFJMOWInjJrzcyPZDpNo6WCHD+pe7uyaAxCP+JHCyRb+ia/+oI njvg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=/VAQpUmVIKXnHih1f88jQtcl5DU6b8RDUldwfQHlGdA=; b=qPyHkE4eG9aednBMlebZ+qiSfBy4yEuaOCMndR1cmoPuj461xQVewmqceAcOt0vvcI S6tVhyqxXDGGkcl4K5t2ZXarMatOl5iyduc78sgVvS5Aa0t7SzYWHI3HcqQNTJe3YA97 Sqm792yVwDe2oX3e7A7xaa7yQb1fd0dVELIeg/GgqTKpP+qhQKsbzg5G5wiuIKFl9Sq1 PiyI/oLC8LiaPRywmdpih4gPUKo1cD/VDFMgZJwuqyOfPsVKuZXpfE77d37lPoT8yJgJ WEddIkB1q2R8jcjnfusdohun3o2w4p6JOn1yNaUu7mPJe1dLtlcdLB6DKKKTfK/sG2K3 gVOQ== X-Received: by 10.49.12.130 with SMTP id y2mr3263294qeb.31.1362657055754; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 03:50:55 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.98.170 with SMTP id ej10ls3301795qeb.45.gmail; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 03:50:54 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.49.29.99 with SMTP id j3mr898698qeh.38.1362657054365; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 03:50:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 03:50:53 -0800 (PST) From: la gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <1993133.NSvoV0VJ9D@caracal> <1775852.k8IIq1qYmY@caracal> <4cbd98c4-dea2-4f19-9438-e6e1411485b1@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] jbovlaste doesn't want to accept some fuhivla MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_152_24867918.1362657053539" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_152_24867918.1362657053539 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thursday, March 7, 2013 3:29:42 PM UTC+4, xorxes wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 8:11 AM, la gleki > > wrote: > > > > I understand the history of the question. I m just wondering about > technical > > issues and the *current* policy. > > When adding a word to jvs should we all consult both jbofi'e and camxes > > every time so that the word is acceptable in both apps? > > Ideally, people who coin fu'ivla should already be familiar with the > morphology rules, so they wouldn't need to consult. In practice, yes, > until all morphology issues have been settled and the jbovlaste's > algorithm has been updated. > > I don't think you will find any discrepancies when it comes to lujvo, > which is what most of jbovlaste consists of. > > > Otherwise why adding words that are not compatible with camxes? > > A few of the words already there are not compatible with camxes. > Then they are to be removed form jvs in future, right? > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_152_24867918.1362657053539 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thursday, March 7, 2013 3:29:42 PM UTC+4, xorxes wrote:On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 8:11 AM, la glek= i <gleki.is...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I understand the history of the question. I m just wondering about= technical
> issues and the *current* policy.
> When adding a word to jvs should we all consult both jbofi'e and c= amxes
> every time so that the word is acceptable in both apps?

Ideally, people who coin fu'ivla should already be familiar with the
morphology rules, so they wouldn't need to consult. In practice, yes,
until all morphology issues have been settled and the jbovlaste's
algorithm has been updated.

I don't think you will find any discrepancies when it comes to lujvo,
which is what most of jbovlaste consists of.

> Otherwise why adding words that are not compatible with camxes?

A few of the words already there are not compatible with camxes.

Then they are to be removed form jvs i= n future, right?
 

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
------=_Part_152_24867918.1362657053539--