Received: from mail-ee0-f59.google.com ([74.125.83.59]:50675) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UEKdL-0003Z5-TQ; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 06:20:39 -0800 Received: by mail-ee0-f59.google.com with SMTP id t10sf1196511eei.24 for ; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 06:20:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:mime-version :x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=f6x7eFO3eROufNQ58Yyv+PTRAolhHtppcig0zCUlJlI=; b=W+gvmTlHuM6baBzOdCKiZBnXm7P4rxD/XlQiNKYhoj2nF9hNNBnz+9fVSELX4Z/sUo CH+gOqu3c4J17IGyEXJ0diFjjborNt/qA+NoO12e0Y/XDDWA+Rai+rAj3KfCkYg+fGVU IG2qrpZ7RCZQehLS8Kw/bDwTZINpR19flSFnOPO0t3WK+U3xIYLWZpMiTXXl3xR2aBtv SV20Pc57rwFxhbtonNGjje4PPc/jwOTLPLEdxzGsxwYtHPyHZQC2VIalBRbBfvkKCtKZ Ou+2xC/KLfzVWz6cP38vkbVjnMHnB4e8YJDHNPQcN9CynVh5ChLdsG0wo2ZONCOAdHk3 PYtg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:mime-version :x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=f6x7eFO3eROufNQ58Yyv+PTRAolhHtppcig0zCUlJlI=; b=ZAIfT6OuJIOo7mfvLQtkgHrHeQVa7Actt52GoT29NiT+8Ne0gC4iwkXEQxK3rX9yuL cROoE7SX1j/Zsach2d4gU0s5Z/UwP76GZJGqtE/jip6FDsP9Otcg9j/DL2wU93WK0kW9 t/AYOv470rXGOhGn9pGt4wAvEDXR6+D6GhL9ozU3pD6XeV2OmlvMw+m0nzXTjsKlY3dd sRR0hM8vtnrnZCLlSz7NWI6mDcWS52Y1GpXCMP9oPNzDLpa85WdcbNMSv0DIrmeJdXRZ LFRP+qmx8PBl2pzfDPLOxXLf91fUyBcIMjAfM4JP69wUWuH79QrgQG37a64/IQM3CNvo 8lVQ== X-Received: by 10.180.72.232 with SMTP id g8mr291495wiv.15.1362838816323; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 06:20:16 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.76.4 with SMTP id g4ls166773wiw.51.canary; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 06:20:15 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.204.173.78 with SMTP id o14mr288841bkz.1.1362838815718; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 06:20:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-la0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14si792501bky.0.2013.03.09.06.20.15 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 09 Mar 2013 06:20:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e; Received: by mail-la0-f46.google.com with SMTP id fq12so2537340lab.5 for ; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 06:20:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.50.42 with SMTP id z10mr2387744lbn.73.1362838815264; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 06:20:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.5.196 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 06:20:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20111216191725.GC22027@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <0c94ef7c-d87f-448a-ae36-6fd8e32f233d@googlegroups.com> Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 07:20:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Mini-rant: gismu place consistency From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0401f7f5785d3c04d77ea3db X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --f46d0401f7f5785d3c04d77ea3db Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 5:32 AM, la gleki wrote: > >> On Saturday, March 9, 2013 4:00:13 PM UTC+4, aionys wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 4:33 AM, MorphemeAddict wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 6:06 AM, la gleki wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Friday, December 16, 2011 11:17:26 PM UTC+4, Robin Powell wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If I had it to do over again, every gismu with an agent place would >>>>>> have it as the first place. Every gismu with an audience or second >>>>>> agent of any type would have it as the second place. There would >>>>>> probably be several other regularities as well. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Let's assume that >>>>> xau = BAI tag denoting agent or reference frame. >>>>> .iei = BAI tag denoting object. >>>>> .uai = BAI tag denoting property of the object. >>>>> >>>>> Then we can rephrase many gismu as >>>>> ko'a djuno lo du'u ko'e brode kei ko'e = xau mi djuno .uai lo ka brode >>>>> .iei ko'i >>>>> (the same for {morji} and company) >>>>> >>>>> ko'a kakne lo ka brode = xau [je .iei] mi kakne .uai lo ka brode >>>>> ko'a te mukti lo nu brode = xau ko'a .iei ko'a .uai lo ka brode kei te >>>>> mukti >>>>> (May be xau = gau or xau = ma'i) >>>>> These tags can replace FA (a separate set of SE is not needed here if >>>>> we use {jai}). >>>>> >>>>> For {vecnu, dunda, cpacu} and {benji} we can use {be'i} tags (if >>>>> {benji} is about sending objects, not information) as the core semantic >>>>> prime for those gismu seems to be the same. >>>>> For sending information another set of BAI might be needed. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I've been saying {manci} and {melbi} to my babies *a lot*, and I >>>>>> *still* have trouble remembering that it's {do melbi mi} and {mi >>>>>> manci do}. GRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This is not the problem. We can just use {selmanci} and forget about >>>>> {manci}. >>>>> {xabju = se zdani} is a better example showing redundancy. >>>>> >>>> >>>> The problem isn't redundancy, it's consistency. >>>> Place structures should be as consistent as possible. >>>> >>> >>> Agreed. I will be very happy when we're allowed to review this and >>> actually do something about it. >>> >> >>> Speaking of, I do know that one thing that will be needed is to know >>> which gismu have inconsistent structure, what would need to be changed to >>> make it consistent with its "family", and how that change affects the >>> corpus. >>> >> >> How is that possible ? I showed how to "fix" that using BAI, SE and >> (semiseriously) experimental BAI. >> > > That's not a fix, it's a workaround. If you don't know the difference, > look it up. > > >> Are there other methods? >> Even if all agentive gismu had agent in x1 then newbies would still >> complain that non-agentive gismu break this "rule". >> > > Then they would be wrong, because the whole thing is about consistency of > place structure among similar gismu, not about about making every gismu > have the exact same place structure. > > >> Or e.g. what's common in djuno3 and klama3, vecnu2 and lakne2? Nothing. >> > > Well, obviously. They're not in the same family. > > However, klama, litru, muvdu, pluta, bevri, and farlu are in the same > family: transportation. Note that they also have similar place structures. > In fact, {litru} = {klama zi'o zi'o}, {muvdu} = {klama fu zi'o}, {pluta} = > {ve klama veka'a loi mokca fo zi'o zi'o}, {bevri} = {zo'e poi lo jgari ku'o > klagau faxixa zi'o} and {farlu} = {klani'a fo zi'o zi'o ci'e zo'e}. As you > can see, while there are some variances as to what places there are, all of > the /shared/ places are in the same exact order, and usually even in the > "x" place. > > As another example, all of the gismu of the measurement family have the > exact same place structure: "x1 is x2 [units of measurement] by standard > x3", and for non-metric: "x1 is x2 [units of measurement] in standard x3 > with sub-units x4", /except/ for mitre: "x1 is x2 meters in direction x3 by > standard x4", which moves the typical x3 place to the x4 and places an > additional "in direction" place in its stead, and minli: "x1 is x2 long > local distance units with sub-units x3 in standard x4", which has the exact > same places as it's brethren, except that the final two are in reverse > order. > > >> Still newbies will have to remember that both for djuno3 and klama3 in >> order to reach this place you have to use either {fi} or {te}. So what >> problems of learnability of the language would be solved? None. >> > > Incorrect. Consistency of place structure amongst gismu families solves > the problem of having to remember exceptions to the typical place > structure, for the simple reason that there would /be none/. > > >> Any volunteers? >>> >> >> Well, i wouldn't recommend changing gismu definitions. Gismu space is >> undepletable. >> > > Which is not the point. The reason for the desire to /fix/ the place > structure of the inconsistent gismu is because they are, as is, broken. And > before you ask how they are broken, the answer is: because they are > inconsistent. > > >> We can create alternative gismu for that. >> > > Which only makes things worse in this scenario. Say we make an > "alternative gismu" for mitre. First off, what shape should it have? > {mitre} is arguably the best shape for the Lojban word for "meter". > Secondly, how would convince people to stop using mitre and instead use > this new word, when they've already learned {mitre}="meter"? Would it not > be simpler to merely say "From now on, the x3 place of mitre is the > standard place, and the direction place is x4.", especially since mitre's > x3 and x4 are so seldom used it wouldn't really affect the corpus, and > would make it consistent with its brethren, thus making it easier to learn > fully? > > >> Besides, given that many hate the sounding of gismu ("selsiclu dukse" >> syndrom and abhorrence of "la kafkylerfu") and complain that 6-language >> mixture made gismu unrecognisable for everyone this can be even advisable. >> > > Personal feelings as to the choice of the shapes of the gismu is > irrelevant to this issue. It is an issue all its own and should be > discussed separately. > > >> Anyway you can add me to your team of volunteers. Just show several >> examples of how it might look like. >> > > I gave two examples above, but this is basically the process in its > entirety: > > 1) Take the whole of the gismu, possibly including the experimental ones, > and group them into families. Species {badna}, Transportation {klama}, Mode > of Travel {cadzu}, Measurement {mitre}, and Comparatives {barda} are a few > families I can think of off the top of my head. Species might need to be > split into the kingdoms (animal, plant, etc.) just because of size. > As a side note, I believe that the grouping of gismu into families has merits of its own, in the same way and for nearly the same reason that grouping the cmavo into selma'o is. > 2) Look at each family, and determine the typical place structure of that > family: what are the places, in what order do they appear, etc. > > 3) Find the gismu that do not have that place structure, and determine > what the differences are, and if they are justified (for example, {pluta} > has a slightly atypical structure, but it is obviously justified, whereas > {mitre}'s inconsistency is much harder to argue for) > > 4) Determine what the smallest change would be required to bring the > inconsistent gismu in line with the typical one for its family (such as > reversing the x3 and x4 places of mitre and minli). > > 5) Determine how this change would affect the corpus (i.e. instances of > usage thus far), and document this for each gismu. (For example, does > reversing the x3 and x4 places affect the meaning of any currently existing > bridi which have {mitre} in them? If so, how many are affected, and what > would the new meaning be?) > > >> >>> >>>> stevo >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -Robin >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. >>>>>> Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot >>>>>> is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" >>>>>> is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/**** >>>>>> rlp/ >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to lojban+un...@**googlegroups.com. >>>>> >>>>> To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**group/lojban?hl=en >>>>> . >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out >>>>> . >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to lojban+un...@**googlegroups.com. >>>> To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com. >>>> >>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**group/lojban?hl=en >>>> . >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out >>>> . >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>> >>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "lojban" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> >> > > > > -- > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --f46d0401f7f5785d3c04d77ea3db Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Jonathan Jones <= span dir=3D"ltr"><eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 5:= 32 AM, la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:=
On Saturday, March 9, 2013 4:00:13 PM UTC+4, aionys wrote:
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 4:= 33 AM, MorphemeAddict <lyt...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 6:06 AM, la gleki <gleki.is...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2011 11:17:26 PM UTC+4, Robin Powell wrote:
If I had it to do over again, ever= y gismu with an agent place would
have it as the first place. =A0Every gismu with an audience or second
ag= ent of any type would have it as the second place. =A0There would
probab= ly be several other regularities as well.

Let's assume that
xau =3D BAI tag denoting agent or refe= rence frame.
.iei =3D BAI tag denoting object.
.uai =3D= BAI tag denoting property of the object.

Then we = can rephrase many gismu as
ko'a djuno lo du'u ko'e brode kei ko'e =3D xau mi djun= o .uai lo ka brode .iei ko'i
(the same for {morji} and compan= y)

ko'a kakne lo ka brode =3D xau [je .iei] mi= kakne .uai lo ka brode
ko'a te mukti lo nu brode =3D xau ko'a .iei ko'a .uai lo k= a brode kei te mukti=A0
(May be xau =3D gau or xau =3D ma'i)<= br>
These tags can replace FA (a separate set of SE is not needed= here if we use {jai}).

For {vecnu, dunda, cpacu} and {benji} we can use {be= 9;i} tags (if {benji} is about sending objects, not information) as the cor= e semantic prime for those gismu seems to be the same.
For sendin= g information another set of BAI might be needed.
=A0

I've been= saying {manci} and {melbi} to my babies *a lot*, and I
*still* have tro= uble remembering that it's {do melbi mi} and {mi
manci do}. =A0GRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH.


This is not the problem. We can just use {selmanci} and forget abou= t {manci}.
{xabju =3D se zdani} is a better example showing redun= dancy.

The problem isn't redundancy, it= 's consistency. =A0
Place structures should be as consistent = as possible. =A0

Agreed. I will be very happy when we're allowed to review this an= d actually do something about it.=A0

Speaking of, I do know that one thing that will be needed is to know wh= ich gismu have inconsistent structure, what would need to be changed to mak= e it consistent with its "family", and how that change affects th= e corpus.

How is that possible ? I= showed how to "fix" =A0that using BAI, SE and (semiseriously) ex= perimental BAI.

That's not a fix= , it's a workaround. If you don't know the difference, look it up.<= br> =A0
Are there ot= her methods?
Even if all agentive gismu had agent in x1 then newb= ies would still complain that non-agentive gismu break this "rule"= ;.

Then they would be wrong, because the whole thi= ng is about consistency of place structure among similar gismu, not about a= bout making every gismu have the exact same place structure.
=A0
Or e.g. what's common in djuno3 and klama3, vecnu2 and lakne2? Not= hing.

Well, obviously. They're not in = the same family.

However, klama, litru, muvdu, pluta, bevri, and far= lu are in the same family: transportation. Note that they also have similar= place structures. In fact, {litru} =3D {klama zi'o zi'o}, {muvdu} = =3D {klama fu zi'o}, {pluta} =3D {ve klama veka'a loi mokca fo zi&#= 39;o zi'o}, {bevri} =3D {zo'e poi lo jgari ku'o klagau faxixa z= i'o} and {farlu} =3D {klani'a fo zi'o zi'o ci'e zo'= e}. As you can see, while there are some variances as to what places there = are, all of the /shared/ places are in the same exact order, and usually ev= en in the "x" place.

As another example, all of the gismu of the measurement family have the= exact same place structure: "x1 is x2 [units of measurement] by stand= ard x3", and for non-metric: "x1 is x2 [units of measurement] in = standard x3 with sub-units x4", /except/ for mitre: "x1 is x2 met= ers in direction x3 by standard x4", which moves the typical x3 place = to the x4 and places an additional "in direction" place in its st= ead, and minli: "x1 is x2 long local distance units with sub-units x3 = in standard x4", which has the exact same places as it's brethren,= except that the final two are in reverse order.
=A0
Still newbie= s will have to remember that both for djuno3 and klama3 in order to reach t= his place you have to use either {fi} or {te}. So what problems of learnabi= lity of the language would be solved? None.

Incorrect. Consistency of place structure among= st gismu families solves the problem of having to remember exceptions to th= e typical place structure, for the simple reason that there would /be none/= .
=A0
Any volunteers?

Well, i wouldn't recommend changing gismu definitions= . Gismu space is undepletable.

Which is no= t the point. The reason for the desire to /fix/ the place structure of the = inconsistent gismu is because they are, as is, broken. And before you ask h= ow they are broken, the answer is: because they are inconsistent.
=A0
We can creat= e alternative gismu for that.

Which only m= akes things worse in this scenario. Say we make an "alternative gismu&= quot; for mitre. First off, what shape should it have? {mitre} is arguably = the best shape for the Lojban word for "meter". Secondly, how wou= ld convince people to stop using mitre and instead use this new word, when = they've already learned {mitre}=3D"meter"? Would it not be si= mpler to merely say "From now on, the x3 place of mitre is the standar= d place, and the direction place is x4.", especially since mitre's= x3 and x4 are so seldom used it wouldn't really affect the corpus, and= would make it consistent with its brethren, thus making it easier to learn= fully?
=A0
Besides, giv= en that many hate the sounding of gismu ("selsiclu dukse" syndrom= and abhorrence of "la kafkylerfu") and complain that 6-language = mixture made gismu unrecognisable for everyone this can be even advisable.<= /div>

Personal feelings as to the choice of the shape= s of the gismu is irrelevant to this issue. It is an issue all its own and = should be discussed separately.
=A0
Anyway you can add me to your team of volunteers. Just show= several examples of how it might look like.
<= br>I gave two examples above, but this is basically the process in its enti= rety:

1) Take the whole of the gismu, possibly including the experimental one= s, and group them into families. Species {badna}, Transportation {klama}, M= ode of Travel {cadzu}, Measurement {mitre}, and Comparatives {barda} are a = few families I can think of off the top of my head. Species might need to b= e split into the kingdoms (animal, plant, etc.) just because of size.

As a side note, I believe that the groupi= ng of gismu into families has merits of its own, in the same way and for ne= arly the same reason that grouping the cmavo into selma'o is.
=A0
2) Look at each family, and determine the typical place structure of that f= amily: what are the places, in what order do they appear, etc.

3) Fi= nd the gismu that do not have that place structure, and determine what the = differences are, and if they are justified (for example, {pluta} has a slig= htly atypical structure, but it is obviously justified, whereas {mitre}'= ;s inconsistency is much harder to argue for)

4) Determine what the smallest change would be required to bring the in= consistent gismu in line with the typical one for its family (such as rever= sing the x3 and x4 places of mitre and minli).

5) Determine how this= change would affect the corpus (i.e. instances of usage thus far), and doc= ument this for each gismu. (For example, does reversing the x3 and x4 place= s affect the meaning of any currently existing bridi which have {mitre} in = them? If so, how many are affected, and what would the new meaning be?)
=A0
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0;margin-left:0.8ex;border= -left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
=A0
stevo


-Robin

--
= http://singinst.org/ : =A0Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. Lojban (http://www.loj= ban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is = "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"=
is "na nei". =A0 My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/= rlp/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.



--
= mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa = bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am yo= ur father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
=A0
=A0



--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

= .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'= o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
--f46d0401f7f5785d3c04d77ea3db--