Received: from mail-vc0-f190.google.com ([209.85.220.190]:39628)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncBCRZPH6MCMINTWM4RICRUBEN4KK4Y@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1UHbbU-0006mq-JL; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:04:09 -0700
Received: by mail-vc0-f190.google.com with SMTP id ht11sf1781174vcb.17
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:03:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:cc:message-id
         :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender
         :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id
         :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=Q80Lx6h9qFG4Q+Jhg7SRewXnLZym9NDegl+ds0kUutE=;
        b=X020ltDlsfR4JyuXhT98mcraASH2D3CgEctzQ/077SQrbdrH0piTY7gxnuLWzyUCUU
         dbEy9WjhuIToxGj98BuqMj4vft6ACiObCiGAmPV7yIZ0SUNaOXzxb2LxYOpX3p/0Mcq7
         HAVXBWeCGtmG39rIwPW4qHDYuJMlNbl4cj2bK9rr8cDOrWkh5qjuUhAPj67IYDaj10kR
         5jRgaipICYwqUOEgimW/mEmfytEo+4ufz+JBjKvbCdwDa1MWRqt+tkat+bisjkqipk17
         coUWBnMUo9rWLTWPrlTyhryNu8wByWZajg2aPtrRgr9QWv89Gthx7RSo7fAjvii+ce+8
         CZTg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:cc:message-id
         :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender
         :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id
         :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=Q80Lx6h9qFG4Q+Jhg7SRewXnLZym9NDegl+ds0kUutE=;
        b=WgSHi1gAarxmPms0jbcB/5Pri9OvLGSNLvrQ9rw7ucKOsqOzIV+7rM3P02sEnL4jjq
         1G0WqqSkfXY/6/6CbHwCvRAyMAkZxQbY2JEgC18AyMKOiSVTkXPTe8GQuqpc4p2DbaPt
         TtOTmcaR6mPVZf7jdWLhy5oz3l9Y+GWZUD8Wcb1PgrjYSosFQUJP+jqJrBPSTXrJYBkC
         as6M+Tp6qMMY5tk+oFeeNlP1ALgLzpnVpBxsC5G9Vjb+ryiOmMpV16K0PN8ckO9/A9CX
         pbxeHPQdY2mILkcAOgp+2D4pusW8ZHJUqCBoYX4eZcE+xl9xk+45WAYffd8l59nsKmSn
         Kwcg==
X-Received: by 10.50.33.175 with SMTP id s15mr1265488igi.8.1363619033786;
        Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.50.158.225 with SMTP id wx1ls1115974igb.21.canary; Mon, 18 Mar
 2013 08:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.50.161.225 with SMTP id xv1mr1270226igb.15.1363619033000;
        Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Cc: lojban-list@lojban.org
Message-Id: <d260b661-2b6a-4f24-bf80-c1a5cb26d930@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <2456930.oZJB8i4mUH@caracal>
References: <2456930.oZJB8i4mUH@caracal>
Subject: [lojban] Re: according to
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_179_22139684.1363619031109"
X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

------=_Part_179_22139684.1363619031109
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1



On Monday, March 18, 2013 6:00:28 PM UTC+4, Pierre Abbat wrote:
>
> "du'o" is glossed "according to". It's quite common, though, for the 
> object of 
> "according to" to be someone who doesn't know it for certain, but asserts 
> it 
> to be true, maybe to the best of his knowledge, but maybe he's lying. This 
> is 
> better expressed by "fi'o xusra", which doesn't have a corresponding word 
> in 
> BAI. How about "xu'a" as an experimental cmavo for "fi'o xusra"? 
>

sorry for straightforwardness but how about NOT using BAI at all 
(memorising 64 cmavo is a hard trick for newbies).

how about {sei ko'a xusra} ?

if u dont agree that {sei} is fine why not define **one** one-syllable 
cmavo instead of slowly replicating the whole gimste in BAI-space ?


> Pierre 
> -- 
> gau do li'i co'e kei do 
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



------=_Part_179_22139684.1363619031109
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><br>On Monday, March 18, 2013 6:00:28 PM UTC+4, Pierre Abbat wrote:<blo=
ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-=
left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">"du'o" is glossed "according to". =
It's quite common, though, for the object of=20
<br>"according to" to be someone who doesn't know it for certain, but asser=
ts it=20
<br>to be true, maybe to the best of his knowledge, but maybe he's lying. T=
his is=20
<br>better expressed by "fi'o xusra", which doesn't have a corresponding wo=
rd in=20
<br>BAI. How about "xu'a" as an experimental cmavo for "fi'o xusra"?
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>sorry for straightforwardness but how =
about NOT using BAI at all (memorising 64 cmavo is a hard trick for newbies=
).</div><div><br></div><div>how about {sei ko'a xusra} ?</div><div><br></di=
v><div>if u dont agree that {sei} is fine why not define *<b>one</b>* one-s=
yllable cmavo instead of slowly replicating the whole gimste in BAI-space ?=
</div><div><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0;m=
argin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>Pierre
<br>--=20
<br>gau do li'i co'e kei do
<br>
<br>
<br></blockquote>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;lojban&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.<br />
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3De=
n">http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out=
">https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out</a>.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;<br />

------=_Part_179_22139684.1363619031109--