Received: from mail-ee0-f60.google.com ([74.125.83.60]:62996) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UJnkt-0003PY-Kf; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 09:26:56 -0700 Received: by mail-ee0-f60.google.com with SMTP id b57sf2054956eek.25 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 09:26:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:mime-version :x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=wNJH8tPvhOaXsThBYYoOLlL1MoYjIfyYMswdRiHCOHU=; b=yjh+ZU+b59K2LRWRyMOEGXIpholJqKWvVVTLoI8vj7kyHCVscFRYTB/SB86HLWU6mB /tUognEFhqFy5UK56lknviwZXGvydugFmp9PU0sto60Cp2TsA/nkJPa7Ih89FT7iiwWN pTdqCBZubYbx/GbVq7ShsQaO8H/pFBRF246XKn6yosdhQGCWOuovyesn38vwwIFcq/XE BHM4/165g5nHBeHa1VecYRdI0RY+eu5vLYgAc1GEucr+tXEkZ65XPFk9568/DNNJvP8t kCa0SmRaxrYOOI/9AzUnK6AvDIbdIm42p4njYW9sUexK4CBFK+a7RFoClvQjY30j0sC3 dEYg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:mime-version :x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=wNJH8tPvhOaXsThBYYoOLlL1MoYjIfyYMswdRiHCOHU=; b=XNv5I5ta6/Me75UqkPiToxf2BznxSwljIeL2kfRsV67bHrNHtCXb/z4vKzZBPkSrA3 KRUP/tgYAoUZU1HWGf1GmVMYjBaW6VKfwCJ+cqBy0SAJc/hA4bkjQZPco1znrhDthrrz g79dRogD2KMH+3wmPcGK4aJBjZcjHByjP+7Z+QObYQCYUfejIpcXvv3vCYQtd8Mss2pI MnLs9h94FNJb0uLf7byWCCEeIYCSSjpNajdp+i7vzRmcAy4v+K7JmTwWji+V6rbpd4B+ zVgpBa25LTRITTsrA79F2zBhh85NBkXnYqruJZm5xRmuqnmGDWCam4IbMTqDD9pkJeCD LtNw== X-Received: by 10.180.97.138 with SMTP id ea10mr123593wib.17.1364142399799; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 09:26:39 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.19.226 with SMTP id i2ls1578929wie.34.gmail; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 09:26:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.205.35.14 with SMTP id su14mr691547bkb.3.1364142399250; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 09:26:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-la0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::22c]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14si868470bky.0.2013.03.24.09.26.39 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 24 Mar 2013 09:26:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22c as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c03::22c; Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id eb20so10025112lab.31 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 09:26:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.110.6 with SMTP id hw6mr4453632lab.43.1364142398930; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 09:26:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.75.40 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 09:26:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <514F1BB9.2070007@gmx.de> References: <514F1132.8020502@gmx.de> <514F1BB9.2070007@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 13:26:38 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] what {me lo broda ku} means and why not allow {selbri NOI} From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22c as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 12:28 PM, selpa'i wrote: > > This is how I understand it: > > For {poi}: > > ko'a broda poi ke'a brode == ko'a broda gi'e brode I agree, that seems to me the only reasonable interpretation for "poi". > For {noi} I can see two possibilites: > > (a) ko'a broda noi zo'e no'a == ko'a broda .i zo'e go'i > (b) ko'a broda noi brode ke'a == brode lo su'u ko'a broda > > I think (b) is more useful and clearer. I'm not sure how seriously you want to take the ==, but the left hand side of (b) should entail "ko'a broda", indeed that is its main claim, and the right hand side doesn't do that. I would suggest: (b) ko'a broda noi brode ke'a == ko'a broda to brode lo su'u ko'a broda toi since the noi-clause is more like a parenthetical than like a new same-level clause. > (There is another option, and that is to make up that ke'a-GOhA. Then, both > (3.1) and (3.2) can be expressed with it. Downside: new cmavo.) The thing with (a) is that in many cases we'd want the ke'a-GOhA to go deeper than first level embedding. But perhaps "co'e" is enough to cover that. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.