Received: from mail-ie0-f183.google.com ([209.85.223.183]:33538) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UK8FI-0003Qd-2S; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 07:19:55 -0700 Received: by mail-ie0-f183.google.com with SMTP id x14sf2068468ief.0 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 07:19:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=HAi3NR7yLwTjjAfaaIi2Vt95/QNi34qphJV91Q1N7uI=; b=p4XPqDMFSe4g+jhggWGLZmInMEdaa+1xGR5wUWVBTIiqd9EzC9WkfL/JKrpDYlIUNq yTpbniQWtEGpP/5niKKdMIJVnUCpPAFHfzyDeCK52nmiSueYxJcyO5hYYg7ujaBHriF1 5RN5NSQXwyKstrf1zxLLHDi9roCHqEGWzb9/2JprSzpgfjYRf0OjVr52TPkIbg0aeRPS PKPiJAb4v3ofIYjBwSuitbCtjNySIgxQ/4IVuIfCpxmvDoBPwIXpNW5a8VruMgGYB81B 9VfK9cxM3dVKklTvjP+KvUn4W5/eBbDcjI+ttUoMuetazuat+KcFIp4x59DqI58OIslb 7EkQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=HAi3NR7yLwTjjAfaaIi2Vt95/QNi34qphJV91Q1N7uI=; b=rjFDCuOIdERa9PMakBjQ6Ocf5DKGLjtVX/F8ww+PTK9r5ftTqn2oh3ZYfR7Xd4LjmP k4VhC5/A3xwIpv5S9XNhcWfL8CQf5vA+6XP4lR6rjD6KI7t78Z+JK0dsTjF0G7IploMs b/1tgfcH3ppFMoQtW5uXMadJCBXnyaP48gV5NWngFdlL8WMqm3Y3eiDzYEPVtE3MbgMp 8AEuLDopE0MEPIY+xGDOVuFtSiCF9D1Bp5hQqBuLXldTZ+qvcBOuZyL4ZiWXYF1MdT7n uxEqd50v5XS4NMaH7U3iFjJyT46bLX82pZ2z3bW6aaDT31ODLnlvbtFR0mkauIf8LW+P eq2Q== X-Received: by 10.49.127.200 with SMTP id ni8mr425880qeb.42.1364221164927; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 07:19:24 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.52.73 with SMTP id r9ls2157514qeo.31.gmail; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 07:19:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.37.39 with SMTP id v7mr646135qej.27.1364221163988; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 07:19:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 07:19:23 -0700 (PDT) From: la gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <4a291bfa-7262-4949-9b42-c25101c5d80c@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: <78563624-9255-41a0-b09c-fb9cd7c03d33@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: No gismu for Difference MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_58_12839152.1364221163465" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_58_12839152.1364221163465 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday, March 25, 2013 9:02:45 AM UTC+4, la gleki wrote: > > > > On Monday, March 25, 2013 5:50:26 AM UTC+4, stevo wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Ian Johnson wrote= : >> >>> Indeed, this has been something that has nagged at the back of my mind= =20 >>> since I started studying the language; there are fairly few words which= are=20 >>> sufficiently similar to their source language counterparts to help a=20 >>> speaker of a source language learn the language more easily.=20 >> >> >> This is why I say the vocabulary is equally d=EDfficult for everybody. T= he=20 >> memory hooks aren't numerous for any given language, and they're not=20 >> consistent enough to make them useful to learn. Totally ad hoc words cou= ld=20 >> hardly be more difficult to learn than what we have.=20 >> > > This algorithm originated in the first SciAm paper by JCB. He claimed the= =20 > existence of global etymology. *sei mi morji *Lojban doesnt have any=20 > goals to prove the existence of such thing. The only reason to apply the= =20 > algorithm is mnemonics. Otherwise Lojban is completely apriori. > > Given that the number of speakers of Romance languages exceed the number= =20 > of Chinese speakers I suggest {difro} or similar gismu once again. > Oh, by Romance languages I meant "Romance languages + English" :) =20 > > However, what I'd like more is not to add more gismu but instead to remov= e=20 > some of the existing. The adoption of {selsumji}=3D"difference" will teac= h=20 > newbies "predicate reasoning". If a person can cope with rearranging sumt= i=20 > places and knows the basic vocabulary then 'ey is already a good speaker = of=20 > Lojban. > > > =20 >> >>> The stated purpose of the algorithm doesn't seem like it was really=20 >>> achieved, pe'i. Not that that's a bad thing, as it still provides a sou= rce=20 >>> of an a priori vocabulary. >>> >>> mi'e la latro'a mu'o >>> >>> >>> --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_58_12839152.1364221163465 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Monday, March 25, 2013 9:02:45 AM UTC+4, la gleki wrote:

On Monday, March 25, 2013 5:50= :26 AM UTC+4, stevo wrote:


<= div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Ian Johnson <blindb...@gmail.com> wrote:
Indeed, this has been something that has nagged at the back of my mind sinc= e I started studying the language; there are fairly few words which are suf= ficiently similar to their source language counterparts to help a speaker o= f a source language learn the language more easily.

This is why I say the vocabulary is equally d=EDfficult= for everybody. The memory hooks aren't numerous for any given language, an= d they're not consistent enough to make them useful to learn. Totally ad ho= c words could hardly be more difficult to learn than what we have. 

This algorithm originated in the = first SciAm paper by JCB. He claimed the existence of global etymology. = sei mi morji Lojban doesnt have any goals to prove the existence of suc= h thing. The only reason to apply the algorithm is mnemonics. Otherwise Loj= ban is completely apriori.

Given that the number o= f speakers of Romance languages exceed the number of Chinese speakers I sug= gest {difro} or similar gismu once again.

=
Oh, by Romance languages I meant  "Romance languages + English" := )

 

However, what I'd like more is not to add more= gismu but instead to remove some of the existing. The adoption of {selsumj= i}=3D"difference" will teach newbies "predicate reasoning". If a person can= cope with rearranging sumti places and knows the basic vocabulary then 'ey= is already a good speaker of Lojban.


 = ;
The stated purpose of the algorithm d= oesn't seem like it was really achieved, pe'i. Not that that's a bad thing,= as it still provides a source of an a priori vocabulary.

mi'e la latro'a mu'o


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
------=_Part_58_12839152.1364221163465--