Received: from mail-ia0-f186.google.com ([209.85.210.186]:58975) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UK9pn-0004P1-B7; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 09:01:31 -0700 Received: by mail-ia0-f186.google.com with SMTP id l29sf2199587iag.23 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 09:01:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=haf9iUXDEpIrh9+5dGK3vEGziK9+23eyZ2mvqO8vruY=; b=ZQ7QDYzJr0y6zPB7JaXNoCb5hSDvi9Nz3fXlHUDWB2id2W4CFBLHs5xVlHZmwyCmDM 1JvVeX3mjmQc7zUeGeVmjorWi5ncq5YLSY8skqXgR0q2A0CRl9V2FZCv7FOf97M2h602 m5E091Qmys/LfocMg1a+b3pt/IHfdpHVsI+64dVbY0sfSFOcivbAIlgObfleKZtbIWok rj84/Qw81cuAqLg2N+yxB+0rjfxQO7SY3WjU8ScEb8WxcTG9/cqWvjauWbLlUf3QLfha Vu5c9Krm33VaeHzPIRx+8Zy55YQQJUWlRBavMyjft/Oel8ksRcjbKjHwHsz3pqfluvqA g3mw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=haf9iUXDEpIrh9+5dGK3vEGziK9+23eyZ2mvqO8vruY=; b=qmWBIdada23FDXrrHaUS4Xa8+qm7WcmMv7R0AZRevijQmLygdoZTYJRD0St3mWq82V obF7LY3aM5W+vX6iQFHVbmWlLf8rDLuvVjO/yD1tl/VlJcE316uKpAT56I8zKCQXdY5W umG1YgogbZbeDvRiqCw6gz2qyWmJFuOk7x39Gm+lRwlxNnlvRTaM5W4N3ctlr8olFHJs ifEUeIJPLXPwZD+gHWKCRfcbTjCj60vYG5hVB1b7Pia7ZcEXl0kfvfqAVqERc7W1cZlO 6cHqvPji2tFKlhiJLoXTpsCVeMkKFEm25QueZ9FXoLDhtu46DCuCF7/Rb6p4hhQXnY+x XILg== X-Received: by 10.49.74.102 with SMTP id s6mr466916qev.25.1364227272606; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 09:01:12 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.105.229 with SMTP id gp5ls2133701qeb.22.gmail; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 09:01:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.82.134 with SMTP id i6mr688094qey.20.1364227271813; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 09:01:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 09:01:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Adam Chevalier To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [lojban] Re: No gismu for Difference MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: chevalieradam2@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_256_29796543.1364227271162" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_256_29796543.1364227271162 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wait, what about vimcu ? Its not perfect, especially when you see the notation about alienation=20 (i've been learning gismu with Anki and it doesn't have this notation, so I= =20 assumed it was mathematical until grabbed that link). On Sunday, March 24, 2013 9:15:11 AM UTC-5, tsani wrote: > > I'm nearly certain this has been remarked on in the past, but there=20 > appears to be no gismu for "difference" in the mathematical sense. This i= s=20 > pretty inconsistent, as there're gismu for the other three basic=20 > mathematical operators, namely {sumji}, {pilji}, and {dilcu}, for sum,=20 > product, and quotient, respectively. > > As it stands, there're a few non-gismu solutions, such as {selsumji}.=20 > Indeed, cleverly rearranging the places of a sum produces a difference in= =20 > much the same way as doing so to the places for a product produces a=20 > quotient. Why, then, should {dilcu} and not exist? > > If we consider that {vu'u}, the mekso subtraction operator, is based on= =20 > {vimcu}, we can try to make a subtraction selbri from it. First, we need = to=20 > remove the agent with zil-, then we need to convert the (thus) x3 with=20 > ter-: {terzilvi'u}. > > {terzilvi'u} has one obvious problem though: semantically, it isn't purel= y=20 > mathematical. The other three are clearly definitely mathematical, wherea= s=20 > {vimcu} is used for any partial removal of something. "Getting a haircut"= =20 > is phrased in terms of {vimcu}. > > It seems like it'd add consistency if a gismu were simply made up for thi= s=20 > rather than try to find other solutions. I (na=C3=AFvely) suggest {subja}= , with=20 > -sub- from English & romlang "subtract" and -ja- from Mandarin "ji=C7=8En= ". > > subja =3D x1 is the difference, x2 minus x3 > > If there were other suggestions for a potential gismu for this in the=20 > past, I'd like to know them. If there were none, I'll probably add this t= o=20 > jbovlaste within a few days. > > .i mi'e la tsani mu'o > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_256_29796543.1364227271162 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wait, what about vimcu?
Its not perfect, especially when you see the notation about= alienation (i've been learning gismu with Anki and it doesn't have this no= tation, so I assumed it was mathematical until grabbed that link).

O= n Sunday, March 24, 2013 9:15:11 AM UTC-5, tsani wrote:
I'm nearly certain this has been remarked on in th= e past, but there appears to be no gismu for "difference" in the mathematic= al sense. This is pretty inconsistent, as there're gismu for the other thre= e basic mathematical operators, namely {sumji}, {pilji}, and {dilcu}, for s= um, product, and quotient, respectively.

As it stands, there're a few non-gismu solutions, such as {s= elsumji}. Indeed, cleverly rearranging the places of a sum produces a diffe= rence in much the same way as doing so to the places for a product produces= a quotient. Why, then, should {dilcu} and not <difference> exist?

If we consider that {vu'u}, the mekso subtraction opera= tor, is based on {vimcu}, we can try to make a subtraction selbri from it. = First, we need to remove the agent with zil-, then we need to convert the (= thus) x3 with ter-: {terzilvi'u}.

{terzilvi'u} has one obvious problem though: semantical= ly, it isn't purely mathematical. The other three are clearly definitely ma= thematical, whereas {vimcu} is used for any partial removal of something. "= Getting a haircut" is phrased in terms of {vimcu}.

It seems like it'd add consistency if a gismu were simp= ly made up for this rather than try to find other solutions. I (na=C3=AFvel= y) suggest {subja}, with -sub- from English & romlang "subtract" and -j= a- from Mandarin "ji=C7=8En".

subja =3D x1 is the difference, x2 minus x3
<= br>
If there were other suggestions for a potential gismu for thi= s in the past, I'd like to know them. If there were none, I'll probably add= this to jbovlaste within a few days.

.i mi'e la tsani mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
------=_Part_256_29796543.1364227271162--