Received: from mail-qa0-f60.google.com ([209.85.216.60]:39552) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1URf74-0006wm-24 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:50:21 -0700 Received: by mail-qa0-f60.google.com with SMTP id bs12sf515649qab.5 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:50:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=mE8mSegQ6hqzKlPEspgCtLYW6qz46RcDPcaNCAtN/FQ=; b=ntDaCRJcoLV+3hAPffJB6/2VBm03upKTLRjfCWXS9S+PKvB3np1EzeSlPWZx8+rfyo FzPJYGPBTL2hMTamvkSdFBjiaKV8T8RB+w7itTgd7Lhe5HPU0D+hon8LRZU2LRfjMtsK PQgQqzz/MPyMKz+YTDCHalfIi7hIqjZBG/mxBifr4imMfgnwWGgo/LR9eG72hME2I1Er ZzgkZ+m4GkCdHHn8POCSgNW0z7tF9qSxBcUbjuQJgAyuvrDocNJZZ7Go9N4rRAO/vodz CNI4OsySMYb7GIceMt4wevidexZgY+ncOMewN6R3sjEZGImynYQxJSb09hUceZ9+/sxN Dmlg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=mE8mSegQ6hqzKlPEspgCtLYW6qz46RcDPcaNCAtN/FQ=; b=WrnbLpYYbRVAibbUAARRJD46ii2c7/FUKUwEdUuohuppKI8v3/sbL8KY9N0qunVLPR TwyF45GcHdV1Vz06TAvtuR7BhorvPScGCRHDsqOYvxg7un+7bwbEpfNQtmpiDQ2nVxff LpOKNI7hAubpkCYvV6djrer16gl1ULabd5MnHkilt0Sxpa7/xkZwMbAvoNIE/PKDgIfj 8LWuwqa7WC9/cG/O8xCH36gTP656+VGkx3AhOjQBZz8SXf9IbHvJX4oqLJYKhBr+DUIW GkSsMiceFTLDZrmb0/BwMu6hf/P2EWEEr7psrAYRCCKstrko7C2aTYsv9JDFzX+x1yDs oSWg== X-Received: by 10.49.52.69 with SMTP id r5mr955631qeo.7.1366015803531; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:50:03 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.86.68 with SMTP id n4ls1581698qez.90.gmail; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:50:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.27.102 with SMTP id s6mr1495377qeg.1.1366015803125; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:50:02 -0700 (PDT) From: la gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <8e34323b-3e08-47ee-8d5e-308c50eb0b9b@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [lojban] Re: nu+roi question MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_835_9014498.1366015802713" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_835_9014498.1366015802713 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Monday, April 15, 2013 5:37:58 AM UTC+4, Latro wrote: > > When I say {mi djica lo nu pa roi broda}, can the {lo nu} be plural? That > is, am I saying "I want broda to happen exactly once" ji "I want event(s) > of broda happening once (as opposed to habitually or some other TAhE) to > happen"? If the latter, how can we express the former? > > This question came up when we tried to distinguish between "I hate that > you fight" and "I hate when you fight", which were questions posed by > gleki. One interpretation of the "that" version was {mi xebni lo nu do ta'e > damba}. The "when" version was similar but with a "time-local" TAhE, "I > hate the time-local events of you fighting". If {pa roi} does the latter > thing above, then {mi xebni lo [so'o] nu do pa roi damba} is a translation > of this interpretation of the "when" version. Otherwise I think there is a > TAhE to be proposed here. > > For completeness I should mention that {mi xebni lo du'u do damba} was > also proposed for the first case; I have mixed feelings about the > correctness of this, but would be interested to hear people's thoughts on > the matter. > 1. I hate that you fight. 2. I hate when you fight. The second sentence for me sounds like "I hate you as a fighter"/"I hate you being a fighter". So we are in the same issue with "as" again. > mi'e la latro'a mu'o > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_835_9014498.1366015802713 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Monday, April 15, 2013 5:37:58 AM UTC+4, Latro wrote:
When I say {mi= djica lo nu pa roi broda}, can the {lo nu} be plural? That is, am I saying= "I want broda to happen exactly once" ji "I want event(s) of broda happeni= ng once (as opposed to habitually or some other TAhE) to happen"? If the la= tter, how can we express the former?

This question came up when we tried to distinguish between "I hat= e that you fight" and "I hate when you fight", which were questions posed b= y gleki. One interpretation of the "that" version was {mi xebni lo nu do ta= 'e damba}. The "when" version was similar but with a "time-local" TAhE, "I = hate the time-local events of you fighting". If {pa roi} does the latter th= ing above, then {mi xebni lo [so'o] nu do pa roi damba} is a translation of= this interpretation of the "when" version. Otherwise I think there is a TA= hE to be proposed here.

For completeness I should mention that {mi xebni lo du'u do = damba} was also proposed for the first case; I have mixed feelings about th= e correctness of this, but would be interested to hear people's thoughts on= the matter.

1. I hate that= you fight.
2. I hate when you fight.

Th= e second sentence for me sounds like "I hate you as a fighter"/"I hate you = being a fighter".
So we are in the same issue with "as" again.



mi'e la latro'a mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
------=_Part_835_9014498.1366015802713--