Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.169 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.169;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMKwHj1xav3VgF66EOhL6gjgMAGCB=PwNyze9Drsh6VseyBChg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+a3wk+E3zzmb_5zw9QyZ6r0v8Sw5zyB6z6ek8QiUC4qe4xaqQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<516C8385.7060805@gmx.de>
	<CAMKwHj1xav3VgF66EOhL6gjgMAGCB=PwNyze9Drsh6VseyBChg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 20:41:36 -0300
Message-ID: <CAO7tK2eU3yVmZQeTMBZ9PQNHRVA=nPjzdt18m4BqNjwxqK-_qQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] CLL, chapter 19, examples
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec519644b2db5be04da6ecbb4
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

--bcaec519644b2db5be04da6ecbb4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:

> They aren't questionable sentences. We know that they are (un)grammatical.
> The first is grammatical if spoken and not if written, the second is the
> reverse.
>
>
It should be pointed out that both examples are grammatical, both in writen
and spoken form, with the camxes grammar. While the issue that these
examples are meant to illustrate still exists for camxes, these examples do
not suffer from it,

An example that would suffer from it might be "lo glico valsi po'u zoi mi
me mi"/"lo glico valsi po'u zoi me me me".

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--bcaec519644b2db5be04da6ecbb4
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail=
_quote">On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Jonathan Jones <span dir=3D"ltr">&=
lt;<a href=3D"mailto:eyeonus@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">eyeonus@gmail.com=
</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">They aren&#39;t questionabl=
e sentences. We know that they are (un)grammatical. The first is grammatica=
l if spoken and not if written, the second is the reverse.<br>
</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div><div class=3D"h5"><br></div></div></d=
iv></blockquote><div><br></div><div style>It should be pointed out that bot=
h examples are grammatical, both in writen and spoken form, with the camxes=
 grammar. While the issue that these examples are meant to illustrate still=
 exists for camxes, these examples do not suffer from it,</div>
<div style><br></div><div style>An example that would suffer from it might =
be &quot;lo glico valsi po&#39;u zoi mi me mi&quot;/&quot;lo glico valsi po=
&#39;u zoi me me me&quot;.</div><div style><br></div><div style>mu&#39;o mi=
&#39;e xorxes =A0</div>
<div style><br></div></div></div></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;lojban&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.<br />
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3De=
n">http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out=
">https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out</a>.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;<br />

--bcaec519644b2db5be04da6ecbb4--