Received: from mail-gh0-f192.google.com ([209.85.160.192]:41227) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UTYhO-0006Ux-3r for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:23:41 -0700 Received: by mail-gh0-f192.google.com with SMTP id r20sf1416727ghr.19 for ; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:23:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:mime-version :x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=+y+r86Vf6C95+9uijgbXhqgsDC5JJiI49p09dVeqkj8=; b=q/WCaN00G4Ose7Lal0DQHXUWxuI9opX/9HCHFp6Je65YGbJuftUQ1D1LzAUMd577S3 r0gu3hNH6oGIC3sT29ej3PEsYSsoi3ni8/YcIXsjzZ7ERXQs/64aL7BMMZqTnAAHCs2R yVl0z126IW70CneEcQz4N2NsRokTBzNZmg5iwvtNxkBi8km/AkNM92TT5UHIqDiNsO7S pdhUfVNBf9+U2BQU6jdTUcqSjrB6SuNuQ9AOs4I/P0yDF4YM1jENv4nXrLzCnHhhkrzs NMPmV6nA0xYfQAh4MndDBerAebgEVXo1izuZj5g4FTst59isqbxYZSM6KZWG7e0+/hXB i8iQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:mime-version :x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=+y+r86Vf6C95+9uijgbXhqgsDC5JJiI49p09dVeqkj8=; b=ldggFqvi0s2T/3twW4H1FI2fKfsa0T9ALk0kbI/Eyt97qtbEQP0SVCIzWrHlCaaftW yj0LKwe3iX+S+fAGun2wyI/W84E28xuKEfgJa7j2euulHncqyI6Ov94p9Aafwht010GH PBql5cISva5eo0+AsknhoNFdxj69WGsgyCXOf6kevYV+aSKQb17/Tc16eaHy9pr7xPVn Onkhp+y2JNfo5uFntJD6bcr9erT71/AAV1xKDl6aSyH5fL4S7wbdJsHWs9Lp2zUIgxQE gLy8ZdYkK0sNm5zeZ4B+PHldVX0Xi+pDYqcC+SLr5IX2z8PHI++BSSwhW47xWnM0prjs Mzdw== X-Received: by 10.49.132.196 with SMTP id ow4mr1983181qeb.28.1366467803910; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:23:23 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.37.230 with SMTP id b6ls2537227qek.3.gmail; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:23:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.58.252.194 with SMTP id zu2mr7220274vec.23.1366467802419; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:23:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vb0-x22e.google.com (mail-vb0-x22e.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c02::22e]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e9si2841982vdi.2.2013.04.20.07.23.22 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:23:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c02::22e as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c02::22e; Received: by mail-vb0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 11so4482589vbe.19 for ; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:23:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.164.166 with SMTP id yr6mr12426925vdb.37.1366467802326; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:23:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.50.147 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:23:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6af67de9-ce70-4e20-af69-a1acc87a840f@googlegroups.com> References: <6af67de9-ce70-4e20-af69-a1acc87a840f@googlegroups.com> Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 11:23:22 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] 5 classes of sumti in Lojban and about a new word for "grammatical abstraction" From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c02::22e as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c187e0f49fb504dacb935e X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --001a11c187e0f49fb504dacb935e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:05 PM, la gleki wrote: > > All lojban constructs can be divided either to > {apstrake}: {bridi}, {fasnu}, {selsku} > or {naly'apstrake}: {namcu}, {dacti}. > Shouldn't the category that includes dacti also include mucti? "li mu cu binxo lo jubme" and "lo plise cu binxo lo du'u ta blanu" both seem like category mistakes, but "lo xadni cu binxo lo pruxi" or "lo cevni cu binxo lo remna" seem fine to me, from a grammatical category point of view. I would also include fasnu in the same category that includes dacti and mucti. Even if there are reasons to subcategorize them, the division here is not as clear-cut as in the case of namcu, bridi (and selkai, terki'i, ... ). Is a waterfall a dacti or a fasnu, is it something different from water falling? It would also be useful to have a general word for bridi/selkai/terki'i/... independent of the number of open slots. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --001a11c187e0f49fb504dacb935e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:05 PM, la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmai= l.com> wrote:

All lojban constructs ca= n be divided either to=A0
{apstrake}: {bridi}, {fasnu}, {selsku}<= /div>
or {naly'apstrake}: {namcu}, {dacti}.

<= /div>
Shouldn't the category that includes dacti also include mucti= ? "li mu cu binxo lo jubme" and "lo plise cu binxo lo du'= ;u ta blanu" both seem like category mistakes, but "lo xadni cu b= inxo lo pruxi" or "lo cevni cu binxo lo remna" seem fine to = me, from a grammatical category point of view.=A0

I would also include fasnu in the same category that in= cludes dacti and mucti. Even if there are reasons to subcategorize them, th= e division here is not as clear-cut as in the case of namcu, bridi (and sel= kai, terki'i, ... ). Is a waterfall a dacti or a fasnu, is it something= different from water falling?

It would also be useful to have a general word for brid= i/selkai/terki'i/... independent of the number of open slots.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
--001a11c187e0f49fb504dacb935e--