Received: from mail-bk0-f64.google.com ([209.85.214.64]:58648) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UTZUs-0006o2-TT for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 08:14:50 -0700 Received: by mail-bk0-f64.google.com with SMTP id w12sf1251822bku.19 for ; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 08:14:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=EwqjE+VKs4Ils8yknwADeEf3w2INKwz/9P5XFy01hnM=; b=rE2laaPyNDJs/AMgTiBgYiZLjebG2IyqDL2QRiR03LM9e+BxpJV8CFpSmxptbFrJg4 pdEvSRdIkKavvXJKsQFofG7Qe6CkerkKgQVY/fp94mD65VTG++F3nY7diFN+JRjix6gT r181MqIjDFbNLimpI+npGtkfPLnwNii55A4BCSlnOaomNRVbc3HvRjIUhyjXMre9t6Bt DVHUPn7d7YajXHQqHjxZN6n/sUvoSASrY5tDMg/Ic2FBHmvsv7NdyzigagiNqo4R3NYk 6mwbrw/F8JOlbHkbTd1rYbQ0SrfKQ0jPQPp4/6Isz1Xv4NrXlSWRNUY0MKNPGDnfZEq9 7GGw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=EwqjE+VKs4Ils8yknwADeEf3w2INKwz/9P5XFy01hnM=; b=D6SDJD8XcAklQxFFTfUkw5Kykyp7CpCHwbaH1HjND07yN14xenPf5dBoZOJy6z06Az H+GqJc24sN1joPMOMeLbegVcuY3I09xaoLPE8u9YDTgufG+wbxgf1xG/d3NbuSG3AAVU Bieu5F8L6Ov3OLEefdGk9Me5fXAmB1xSJ0u7xmLpJGvbDH005pe0dcRGigyGCdU99N/i 2nYjo3VIhRrvgsEZhdkeyO6/O/2+N5YspPNAbSKhS7Pc/7W1KhkyrUNoXAJzFxUxg/BG 1lMVCVIcrGT7UQlDFC3dWlTtymz4gceIGkHu1uZn+8uXQajmZcsVQ79uwQvruUbiioSs 2seA== X-Received: by 10.152.7.103 with SMTP id i7mr221832laa.4.1366470870784; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 08:14:30 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.9.105 with SMTP id y9ls215083laa.69.gmail; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 08:14:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.152.21.33 with SMTP id s1mr223629lae.40.1366470869419; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 08:14:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 08:14:28 -0700 (PDT) From: la gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <58e81126-867f-42be-8e3d-0a9960a7f5ff@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: <6af67de9-ce70-4e20-af69-a1acc87a840f@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] 5 classes of sumti in Lojban and about a new word for "grammatical abstraction" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_770_23978111.1366470868096" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_770_23978111.1366470868096 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Saturday, April 20, 2013 6:23:22 PM UTC+4, xorxes wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:05 PM, la gleki > > wrote: > >> >> All lojban constructs can be divided either to >> {apstrake}: {bridi}, {fasnu}, {selsku} >> or {naly'apstrake}: {namcu}, {dacti}. >> > > Shouldn't the category that includes dacti also include mucti? > Sure. We just dont have a word to describe it, do we? "li mu cu binxo lo jubme" and "lo plise cu binxo lo du'u ta blanu" both > seem like category mistakes, but "lo xadni cu binxo lo pruxi" or "lo cevni > cu binxo lo remna" seem fine to me, from a grammatical category point of > view. > > I would also include fasnu in the same category that includes dacti and > mucti. > I probably wanted something different. Now my question is: do we have right to put all {su'u} places into one grammatical class? gimste is not clear what type NU is in what place needed. Even if there are reasons to subcategorize them, the division here is not > as clear-cut as in the case of namcu, bridi (and selkai, terki'i, ... ). Is > a waterfall a dacti or a fasnu, is it something different from water > falling? > > It would also be useful to have a general word for > bridi/selkai/terki'i/... independent of the number of open slots. > note taken. > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_770_23978111.1366470868096 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Saturday, April 20, 2013 6:23:22 PM UTC+4, xorxes wrote:

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:05 PM, la gleki <gleki.is...@gmail.com> wrote:

All lojban constructs ca= n be divided either to 
{apstrake}: {bridi}, {fasnu}, {selsk= u}
or {naly'apstrake}: {namcu}, {dacti}.

Shouldn't the category that includes dacti also include mucti?
<= /div>
 
Sure. We just dont have= a word to describe it, do we?

= "li mu cu binxo lo jubme" and "lo plise cu binxo lo du'u ta blanu" both se= em like category mistakes, but "lo xadni cu binxo lo pruxi" or "lo cevni cu= binxo lo remna" seem fine to me, from a grammatical category point of view= . 

I would also include fasnu in the same category that in= cludes dacti and mucti.

=
I probably wanted something different. Now my question is: do we have = right to put all {su'u} places into one grammatical class? gimste is not cl= ear what type NU is in what place needed. 

Even if there are reasons to subcategorize them, the divi= sion here is not as clear-cut as in the case of namcu, bridi (and selkai, t= erki'i, ... ). Is a waterfall a dacti or a fasnu, is it something different= from water falling?

It would also be useful to have a general word for brid= i/selkai/terki'i/... independent of the number of open slots.

note taken.
 

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
------=_Part_770_23978111.1366470868096--