Received: from mail-da0-f58.google.com ([209.85.210.58]:50002) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UTgLR-0000Jx-SJ for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 15:33:26 -0700 Received: by mail-da0-f58.google.com with SMTP id d39sf1889065dal.13 for ; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 15:33:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:mime-version :x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=n98L1qkd9v1HzJG4GIFuIOJEfOqQXEJ/IS1kvmOUzJE=; b=xFO3tXSK7wA5B1DRWkHTDtJ2MjewD7zmHH+qVpS7059nCqSJtEfVMT+Y1VY/xjvvN6 gUT6FoETZGss0kPfsPxxJ0lfX/qrDrwypS+AUVrJ46ATXiH1twz2DCglNw09/h4m3oJ0 IiA0PtJq0U1q1M8+wOXfybVfnZoyqbnBI2Eigcw2Pesa7gyNMuYLk1R/gjnckKX+35Ra 4Xip9qMJQ/d9+EjQCXgBg1Zss/Y9u5P6Q3VdYHSSpUWkyX6mKSHgA/6D0zm7X3SG4WFW nqAyNouoJR7M5hbNw4Zti6SHbemzMZwcJ77+8cW3MW7EH6QrGAd40mxAgAadUrP2s9SU gItA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:mime-version :x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=n98L1qkd9v1HzJG4GIFuIOJEfOqQXEJ/IS1kvmOUzJE=; b=I4ZnQ2nVMavHMSrluj+eCXNhxW4o2xbmQjNWXTCng3lxdh2cljuoqIab8g7fcNHBwg DGbjstWlsjGrYQFjowMVNoyCxePKWvrGYbWBN9JXNTiasAEbDc0UYlZSLHYvMn01Sytz u4cX05iC+zBr04vGq4VqDlUu93AfQEcic4SGlPzBi8XEPhcpgq59kBbBH/NXVzbsWtbN cwNyHm0XuhNAUg0FPJdiewEOGD6XXQmpoKlnE6NTnlgOqeu1YWij8W1ocQy0Kp1x+za2 B+LvVRZiO/e5CdRT6uDIZmNmjM84BPPDBlfWDvuM0CmLCCtG9Y89SvePPLugbB+mG7SR 8+Pg== X-Received: by 10.50.126.70 with SMTP id mw6mr1238665igb.10.1366497195483; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 15:33:15 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.42.137 with SMTP id o9ls1198981igl.15.gmail; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 15:33:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.43.61.72 with SMTP id wv8mr15682185icb.21.1366497194924; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 15:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ia0-x22a.google.com (mail-ia0-x22a.google.com [2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22a]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ex5si827362igc.1.2013.04.20.15.33.14 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 20 Apr 2013 15:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22a as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22a; Received: by mail-ia0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 21so4283919iay.29 for ; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 15:33:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.130.83 with SMTP id oc19mr12465370igb.29.1366497194827; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 15:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.187.83 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 15:33:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5d22d3a4-46ca-4f77-bff4-5aa52f193e13@googlegroups.com> <1366476166.27815.YahooMailNeo@web184403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 18:33:14 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Should I quit learning Lojban? From: Ian Johnson To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: blindbravado@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22a as permitted sender) smtp.mail=blindbravado@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b418e99e2676f04dad26b7e X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --047d7b418e99e2676f04dad26b7e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 3:11 PM, shanoxilt < osiris_hades_deathland@hotmail.com> wrote: > In fact, almost none of the really complex pieces of Lojban are actually >> needed and those that are are easily analogized to familiar patterns in >> English. > > > But if I'm just going to use Lojban as encoded English, what's the point > of learning it? > First, even for Lojban as it exists now, I think that comment was somewhat overstated. The very basics are similar, that's true. Even somewhat more complicated things can be fairly well approximated by straightforward replacements. For example, FA (and the default ordering, as a special case) are essentially verb-specific prepositions, and NU can often be translated as various clause-introducing words like "that" and "to", etc. While English lacks the tools for unambiguous clause separation that Lojban has, only in rather complicated sentences does this tend to be a practical problem. The real problem in my experience, which I had even before learning Lojban, is that sufficiently getting complex English sentences to behave the way you want results in them being intolerably awkward. (That sentence exemplifies itself to a fair extent.) Complex Lojban sentences in my experience "flow" nicer than their English counterparts, especially in writing. One of the most basic things that isn't nearly as easy to translate by approximate replacement is things involving ka/ni. In particular, {zmadu} and its various counterparts are quite structurally different from their direct English counterparts, and because they take generic bridi rather than just adjectives, they are also more extensible than their counterparts. mi'e la latro'a mu'o -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --047d7b418e99e2676f04dad26b7e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On S= at, Apr 20, 2013 at 3:11 PM, shanoxilt <osiris_hades_deat= hland@hotmail.com> wrote:
In fact, almost none of the really complex pieces of Lojban are actually ne= eded and those that are are easily analogized to familiar patterns in Engli= sh.

But if I'm just going to use = Lojban as encoded English, what's the point of learning it?
First, even for Lojban as it exists now, I think that com= ment was somewhat overstated. The very basics are similar, that's true.= Even somewhat more complicated things can be fairly well approximated by s= traightforward replacements. For example, FA (and the default ordering, as = a special case) are essentially=20 verb-specific prepositions, and NU can often be translated as various=20 clause-introducing words like "that" and "to", etc. Whi= le English lacks the tools for unambiguous clause separation that Lojban ha= s, only in rather complicated sentences does this tend to be a practical pr= oblem. The real problem in my experience, which I had even before learning = Lojban, is that sufficiently getting complex English sentences to behave th= e way you want results in them being intolerably awkward. (That sentence ex= emplifies itself to a fair extent.) Complex Lojban sentences in my experien= ce "flow" nicer than their English counterparts, especially in wr= iting.

One of the most basic things that isn't nearly as easy to translat= e by approximate replacement is things involving ka/ni. In particular, {zma= du} and its various counterparts are quite structurally different from thei= r direct English counterparts, and because they take generic bridi rather t= han just adjectives, they are also more extensible than their counterparts.=

mi'e la latro'a mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
--047d7b418e99e2676f04dad26b7e--