Received: from mail-pa0-f57.google.com ([209.85.220.57]:40079) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UWSnF-0000Je-Lt for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 07:41:41 -0700 Received: by mail-pa0-f57.google.com with SMTP id hk2sf218474pac.22 for ; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 07:41:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf :x-yahoo-newman-property:x-yahoo-newman-id:x-ymail-osg :x-rocket-mimeinfo:x-mailer:references:message-id:date:from:reply-to :subject:to:in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=rFbg5g5Y0/WWJvNNOJjwcxDXDnMnqednCC3BJMQcgpY=; b=PhdzUT2qRaf5Pq2t/WoD17DT27rfakVsbzJ7T1tO2QoehiiAg0TVVLOdDeBw5V7bdG h5XTkWtDv3AYSy7uOQQzdgxEOzRTZur6+MwLBeSQdYIHEp9UVRN89bcSgkaVwvysyWjI +Lz57++h9xzciV9V9RgVU+Gbcb3WufAe8NSq6NhajUmy7ETsZ2snKLo0f18C8J0cYOcb Tli1FndUJt0M1tJBJ3cnop0Txv6ezmeM9pNu8rgZlIvNDZ76upG+W77puXEa7AlF0b5V Puho1a9+mAPFhmHBlreNJ43C+s5UPaSpkVcDnsxD/AytkSckEToPSCpk1Of8/NHOQcoE K6ZA== X-Received: by 10.49.82.100 with SMTP id h4mr4259574qey.17.1367160087264; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 07:41:27 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.24.6 with SMTP id q6ls1805189qef.35.gmail; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 07:41:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.236.188.103 with SMTP id z67mr24262167yhm.30.1367160085758; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 07:41:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm2-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com (nm2-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com. [66.94.237.66]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k57si1081105yhi.3.2013.04.28.07.41.25 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 28 Apr 2013 07:41:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.237.66 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.94.237.66; Received: from [66.94.237.199] by nm2.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Apr 2013 14:41:25 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.118] by tm10.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Apr 2013 14:41:25 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1023.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Apr 2013 14:41:25 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 78017.41718.bm@omp1023.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 66984 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Apr 2013 14:41:24 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: zytK1IAVM1lmc.9Mc_k3E8WANehgzhq6O3MzLEw9AB3EbWc _L8sdG9_aB7ukVCzbugPXn2if6.uZXhT3jDP3IileN.JfzXQOfTDx28QOwFK M4H6sM1IiLpat8mRpebQWeuHqkAsiUWotZ8DOpdDa11Bg5kJA86NX7EI2z.h dxYRSvfPKuUXwe7zte1vIjbrmas_avnvvS85FqGo_MQdwdeeia3jvbWU3Afk .i9Qyj8bvpD4PfPN8_IJuPDhVM7j8u.I47yFgYqvtSLAWGQO7AXvDwiuJx6W LGSWZMtZZfoh7ixezLGkOkpVvxvpJK4a11IWyZMBl53nosWeI9PfY_HKYL0h OBXKm77hdsjVZ3yK2ofmL.2Z5dn9h4A88N_5q5HGJ3shzI1ae0LZpvRGwMTh yKW0NW8kDR.gTKr0IVW0YgiRWZXD9dc53tlajVkT3FvHLkTHVgwg6nfRaxSp q0e3H.2VGde4mpQZm8HgYAZj0BZPJdowdVR2iC0ck2ybrUz7Dlc3nIXvpyWi GW05pFEKu6xBF3o1Oa81BWaBv8OpYOT7XyK64SUga63UTEio_aJa72AkdUH6 yqfZRqTfxPUvKzjb9hr1C0xbJhox7eW.p.e1X3_N2OAQxHQTjWjbouxOwlvG IecTnyfxtBlyfzhQusyBmpD8WcGPDZ4IbkVO9UM9giq5CtduxG1pc10cgeGH XCpeIDtnfj3q8SVD7oEgmRfWn0OLzWTbSzmDd78ZcNjDd618LkIFqaCjTZgy qHfrX2Rgh7uxCWUT_RSwiEpWOHQUpeGNj8Vdyzd4lL2zQ Received: from [99.92.108.194] by web184406.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 07:41:24 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001,VGhlIHByb2JsZW0gaXMgbm90IHRoZSBhbHBoYWJldCwgYnV0IHRoZSB1c2Ugb2YgaXQuwqAgRW5nbGlzaCBpcyBhIGhvcnJpYmxlICh0aG91Z2ggbm90IHRoZSB3b3JzdCBhcHBhcmVudGx5KSBleGFtcGxlLsKgIEl0IHVzZXMgKGluZWZmaWNpZW50bHkpIDI2IGxldHRlcnMgZm9yIDQwKyAodmFyeWluZyB3aXRoIGRpYWxlY3QpIHBob25lbWVzLCBtb3N0IHNvdW5kcyBjYW4gYmUgc3BlbGxlZCBhdCBsZWFzdCB0d28gd2F5cywgbWFueSBtb3JlIHRvd2FyZCBhIGRvemVuLCBhbmQgbWFueSBzcGVsbGluZ3MgaGEBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.141.536 References: Message-ID: <1367160084.65861.YahooMailNeo@web184406.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 07:41:24 -0700 (PDT) From: John E Clifford Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: BBC on "Spell As You Pronounce Universally" To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.237.66 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass header.i=@yahoo.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1789658926-116165682-1367160084=:65861" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --1789658926-116165682-1367160084=:65861 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The problem is not the alphabet, but the use of it.=A0 English is a horribl= e (though not the worst apparently) example.=A0 It uses (inefficiently) 26 = letters for 40+ (varying with dialect) phonemes, most sounds can be spelled= at least two ways, many more toward a dozen, and many spellings have more = than one pronunciation.=A0 This all is largely untrue in Finnish, for examp= le, and in several other languages which regularly revise the official spel= ling to meet the changing pronunciation (while trying, with considerable la= ck of success, to keep the pronunciation shifts from happening).=A0 English= , with over a hundred *recognized* dialects and no authoritative central co= ntrol, has no chance of doing any of this.=A0 Nor would a phonetic alphabet= help -- it would simply make the various dialects as mutually unintelligib= le in written form as they are in spoken (I leave the captions on for all B= BC shows now).=A0 We are essentially in the Chinese position, with a written language which we all share (more or less, the Commonwealth has a = slightly different version, as Taiwan does in the Chinese sphere), which we= read by shape without too much attention to the details, but which gives m= urky clues to pronunciation.=A0 The most a phonetic alphabet would do would= be to make out treatment of foreign words a little more respectful. ________________________________ From: la gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com=20 Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2013 5:25 AM Subject: [lojban] Re: BBC on "Spell As You Pronounce Universally" =20 On Sunday, April 28, 2013 1:25:39 PM UTC+4, tijlan wrote: An article that may be of interest to jbopre: > >"Could a new phonetic alphabet promote world peace?" >http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-21505114 > >Some quotes: > >"The reason why Finland shines in education is because their children have= to spend very little time learning to read and write. It is completely pho= netic." > >"Utopian language projects, in which an artificial system is put forward a= s an alternative to what's developed naturally, tend to fail. People are st= rongly attached to the distinctiveness and idiosyncrasies of whatever langu= age they use." > >"Shared language can dupe us into thinking we share other things - values,= beliefs, goals - when in many cases we don't. Does it minimize differences= , or merely mask them?" > There is such a thing as IPA. I don't think it's hard to learn Latin, Cyril= lic, Greek, Arabic and Hebrew alphabets. If you need Indian languages learn their alphabets.=A0 Next, I don't want to replace Chinese script with pinyin or similar derivat= ions. It causes problems even for Chinese that are already forgetting how t= o write characters due to excessive use of pinyin-enabled keyboards. Next, such apps like MultiLing O keyboard for Android allow to enter text i= n any alphabet. And they contain dictionaries now even for Lojban. Lastly, alphabet wouldn't change much. One would still have to learn all th= ose languages with old alphabets. You can't remove the written history of h= umanity and autoconversion from one alphabet into another is still out of q= uestion cuz we have plenty of paper books. If you need a unified language that would retain expressive power of other = languages including even math notation (that is also a language) then you need Lojban or it's derivatives. Other methods that I know would f= ail or have already failed. >mu'o > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --1789658926-116165682-1367160084=:65861 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The proble= m is not the alphabet, but the use of it.  English is a horrible (thou= gh not the worst apparently) example.  It uses (inefficiently) 26 lett= ers for 40+ (varying with dialect) phonemes, most sounds can be spelled at = least two ways, many more toward a dozen, and many spellings have more than= one pronunciation.  This all is largely untrue in Finnish, for exampl= e, and in several other languages which regularly revise the official spell= ing to meet the changing pronunciation (while trying, with considerable lac= k of success, to keep the pronunciation shifts from happening).  Engli= sh, with over a hundred *recognized* dialects and no authoritative central = control, has no chance of doing any of this.  Nor would a phonetic alp= habet help -- it would simply make the various dialects as mutually unintelligible in written form as they are in spoken (I leave the captions= on for all BBC shows now).  We are essentially in the Chinese positio= n, with a written language which we all share (more or less, the Commonweal= th has a slightly different version, as Taiwan does in the Chinese sphere),= which we read by shape without too much attention to the details, but whic= h gives murky clues to pronunciation.  The most a phonetic alphabet wo= uld do would be to make out treatment of foreign words a little more respec= tful.


From: la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com&= gt;
To: lojban@googleg= roups.com
Sent: Sunday, April = 28, 2013 5:25 AM
Subject:<= /b> [lojban] Re: BBC on "Spell As You Pronounce Universally"



On Sunday, April 28, 2013 1:25:39 PM UTC+= 4, tijlan wrote:
An article that may be of interest to jbopre:

"Coul= d a new phonetic alphabet promote world peace?"
http://www.bbc.co.uk/new= s/magazine-21505114

Some quotes:

"The reason why Finland shines in education is beca= use their children have to spend very little time learning to read and writ= e. It is completely phonetic."

"Utopian language projects, in which = an artificial system is put forward as an alternative to what's developed n= aturally, tend to fail. People are strongly attached to the distinctiveness= and idiosyncrasies of whatever language they use."

"Shared language can dupe us into thinking we share other things - valu= es, beliefs, goals - when in many cases we don't. Does it minimize differen= ces, or merely mask them?"

=
There is such a thing as IPA. I don't think it's hard to lea= rn Latin, Cyrillic, Greek, Arabic and Hebrew alphabets.
If you ne= ed Indian languages learn their alphabets. 

N= ext, I don't want to replace Chinese script with pinyin or similar derivati= ons. It causes problems even for Chinese that are already forgetting how to= write characters due to excessive use of pinyin-enabled keyboards.

Next, such apps like MultiLing O keyboard for Android all= ow to enter text in any alphabet. And they contain dictionaries now even fo= r Lojban.

Lastly, alphabet wouldn't change much. O= ne would still have to learn all those languages with old alphabets. You can't remove the written history of humanity and autoconversion from o= ne alphabet into another is still out of question cuz we have plenty of pap= er books.

If you need a unified language that woul= d retain expressive power of other languages including even math notation (= that is also a language)
then you need Lojban or it's derivatives= . Other methods that I know would fail or have already failed.

mu'o
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_o= ut.
 
 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
--1789658926-116165682-1367160084=:65861--