Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 08:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Message-Id: <685fb757-9e68-441b-b74d-8d432368103a@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAQ0imMbN0QxGoXNu6DmMu-=iT1xjB9atONWxbDoEwiaWJHTNA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <m0pe2eX-0000R2C@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
 <e3313328-1478-4e76-97df-fd89fcaa19f5@googlegroups.com>
 <517D5810.6030003@gmx.de>
 <CAHiXx=MeNsh7F_q-fGxR7LhFsU7R157jWj6M6cqkhf-mpzZsCw@mail.gmail.com>
 <34d4b1a3-f85c-40e3-9fea-28d46a738c15@googlegroups.com>
 <CAAQ0imMbN0QxGoXNu6DmMu-=iT1xjB9atONWxbDoEwiaWJHTNA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: The Mad Proposals
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_244_8870454.1367248279784"
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

------=_Part_244_8870454.1367248279784
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1


On Monday, April 29, 2013 5:21:03 PM UTC+4, remod wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 8:01 AM, la gleki <gleki.is...@gmail.com<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> Although one is always free to add http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/gijeand it's friends to jbovlaste.
>>
>>  
> In this case it would be different as they would probably interfere with 
> the formal grammar. The language must remain unambigously parseable  or 
> every will be lost!
>
> The best would be if the changes would be compatible so that whatever was 
> grammatically correct before introducing GIJA will stay correct.
>

if GIhA is retained for backward compatibility then nothing previously 
written is broken. But only for GIJA/GIhA. Other proposals break some 
things.

btw, cmavo definitions have been initially broken in jbovlaste. A complaint 
that i got just today is that

{.ai} means "intent" but defined in jvs as the full scale "attitudinal: 
intent - indecision - rejection/refusal." which has to be in comments, not 
in the definition.


> remod
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


------=_Part_244_8870454.1367248279784
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><br>On Monday, April 29, 2013 5:21:03 PM UTC+4, remod wrote:<blockquote=
 class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1=
px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div class=3D"gmail=
_quote">On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 8:01 AM, la gleki <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a =
href=3D"javascript:" target=3D"_blank" gdf-obfuscated-mailto=3D"wed6Vuj_xYc=
J">gleki.is...@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><br></div><div>Although one is always f=
ree to add <a href=3D"http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/gije" target=3D"_bla=
nk">http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/<wbr>dict/gije</a> and it's friends to jbov=
laste.</div>

<div></div><br></blockquote><div>&nbsp;</div></div>In this case it would be=
 different as they would probably interfere with the formal grammar. The la=
nguage must remain unambigously parseable&nbsp; or every will be lost!<br><=
br></div>
<div>The best would be if the changes would be compatible so that whatever =
was grammatically correct before introducing GIJA will stay correct.<br></d=
iv></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>if GIhA is retained for backward =
compatibility then nothing previously written is broken. But only for GIJA/=
GIhA. Other proposals break some things.</div><div><br></div><div>btw, cmav=
o definitions have been initially broken in jbovlaste. A complaint that i g=
ot just today is that</div><div><br></div><div>{.ai} means "intent" but def=
ined in jvs as the full scale "attitudinal: intent - indecision - rejection=
/refusal." which has to be in comments, not in the definition.</div><div><b=
r></div><div><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0=
;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;"><div di=
r=3D"ltr"><div></div><div><br></div><div>
remod<br></div></div>
</blockquote>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;lojban&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.<br />
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3De=
n">http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out=
">https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out</a>.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;<br />

------=_Part_244_8870454.1367248279784--