Received: from mail-ob0-f190.google.com ([209.85.214.190]:42356) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UX8Pe-0002Zi-Qr for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 04:08:12 -0700 Received: by mail-ob0-f190.google.com with SMTP id eh20sf165786obb.27 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 04:07:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:cc:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=TO37sLPQg9Q4n3bZUhhcbuiXU6hMSTZkplXYAPnupGA=; b=vN+bdWyOtGA6tNJg7u+pUhJzUaxjKXvY2lvRqng9CDBSO9v5yerkbaxENAUAfLdO9b zOwEX8TZs24/qre+NdM2Sm1GDBRF88a4Vt8Sya6NjBNrQMMLpXs6QqoFEKlHILKqWjrT YALEB+G0tV5Sv1iRVVp5rlYB+cOf8w27hzy+Fovwz0YTtkZJkhdHQIavy0jsjp5JDGfC E3FCsPHEffWl3LSOXkNGCckX2nmqK7HzaoyOHo+2uZZBraqL+7nE4cEVXAeWuTrglaob dy9vPyQ6yOY+jpz5qKEx2yN0Yzru3b0LsOOw40GvxFFqdiajpxQmWrkJb6a19XKQgEC4 eKoQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:cc:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=TO37sLPQg9Q4n3bZUhhcbuiXU6hMSTZkplXYAPnupGA=; b=PJr2wn1ItIXWEWocgF0QbL2DEamZl6rb42F838fQVTo9SZWYtrfRsSgnymA/uKdp13 Jc6VbtUcphWnDQOS2+jAQenxokH3f3iSaaU2t4dFu9AaLz3FCmKIWXb5Ra7/H5kKapgz DdmFgKMtppwgxxLP9HCClIGlSh4PcfaFQFu0UZn+ruWtZGyNZolR2OLvX7Rzvamn8qKo rSYOcIq+2CIkhzkWnagmbpCbbrKD9diOjQ9WTIJ7NshpyU0TVJcIKOuauGPByYahQZ1u OzyK+AGUMc+c4J5wHB6ODDqtph2qZEuSqse8nqYD6mQZyHK4yAF381be5Mgxn+0AakC1 D+Kg== X-Received: by 10.49.109.34 with SMTP id hp2mr897863qeb.33.1367320072276; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 04:07:52 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.1.51 with SMTP id 19ls159344qej.38.gmail; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 04:07:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.35.129 with SMTP id h1mr229791qej.28.1367320070873; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 04:07:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 04:07:50 -0700 (PDT) From: la gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Cc: rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <20130429163424.GP10220@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <71a0be7f-85af-4b53-8212-8e2de124cf9c@googlegroups.com> <517EB27B.1050808@gmx.de> Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Baby Words: "you're right" and orders. MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2671_27540523.1367320070208" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_2671_27540523.1367320070208 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Monday, April 29, 2013 11:27:41 PM UTC+4, .arpis. wrote: > > > In particular, is there a difference between (1) and (2), and if so, what >> is it? >> >> (1) .i .e'o do mi sidju >> "Please help me." >> >> (2) .i .e'o ko mi sidju >> "Please help me. > > > Yes, there is a difference, but it's the sort that probably won't matter > outside of poetry or literary analysis. As you say, the latter is more > direct. > > To take another example, contrast {.e'o ko cliva} with {.e'o do cliva}: in > the latter, I might be more aware of (and maybe more interested in) the > possibility that a bouncer would throw you out. > if we assume that UI = sei ke'a broda se'u and then .i brode sei ke'a broda se'u ~= lo nu brode cu broda then e'o do cliva ~= mi cpedu lo nu do cliva ko cliva = do ko'oi cliva ~= mi [imperatively/hortatively say ] lo nu ba'e do cliva e'o ko cliva = e'o do ko'oi cliva ~= mi cpedu lo nu do cliva ije mi [imperatively/hortatively say ] lo nu ba'e do cliva > MorphemAddict: Imperative refers to a grammatical construct which carries > the pragmatics that the listener do something; command refers to any > statement that has such pragmatics and is also given from a (presumed) > position of power. > > "Close the window." is an imperative but may or may not be a command; > "Please close the window." is an imperative but probably not a command; > "You'd better close the window now!" is a command but not an imperative. > As many mix hortatives and imperatives then it's probably beter to call {ko'oi} a generalised version of imperatives and hortatives as it is hinted in the notes to this word. > > -- > mu'o mi'e .arpis. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_2671_27540523.1367320070208 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Monday, April 29, 2013 11:27:41 PM UTC+4, .arpis. wrote:

In particular, is there a difference between (1) and (2), and if so, what i= s it?

(1) .i .e'o do mi sidju
    "Please help me."

(2) .i .e'o ko mi sidju
    "Please help me.

Yes, there is a difference, but it's the = sort that probably won't matter outside of poetry or literary analysis. As = you say, the latter is more direct.

To take another example, contrast {.e'o ko cliva} with {.e'o do cliva}: in = the latter, I might be more aware of (and maybe more interested in) the pos= sibility that a bouncer would throw you out.


if we assume that UI =3D sei ke'a broda se= 'u 
and then

.i brode sei ke'a brod= a se'u ~=3D lo nu brode cu broda

then
e'o do cliva ~=3D mi cpedu lo nu do cliva

=
ko cliva =3D do ko'oi cliva ~=3D mi [imperatively/hortatively say ] lo= nu ba'e do cliva
e'o ko cliva =3D e'o do ko'oi cliva ~=3D mi cpe= du lo nu do cliva ije mi [imperatively/hortatively say ] lo nu ba'e do= cliva



MorphemAddict: Imperative refers to a grammatical construct = which carries the pragmatics that the listener do something; command refers= to any statement that has such pragmatics and is also given from a (presum= ed) position of power.

"Close the window." is an imperative but may or may not be a= command; "Please close the window." is an imperative but probably not a co= mmand; "You'd better close the window now!" is a command but not an imperat= ive.

As many = mix hortatives and imperatives then it's probably beter to call {ko'oi} a g= eneralised version of imperatives and hortatives as it is hinted in the not= es to this word.
 

--
mu'o mi'e .arpis.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
------=_Part_2671_27540523.1367320070208--