Received: from mail-bk0-f62.google.com ([209.85.214.62]:62697) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UXWsF-0006UD-Ku for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 01 May 2013 06:15:18 -0700 Received: by mail-bk0-f62.google.com with SMTP id j4sf351438bkw.7 for ; Wed, 01 May 2013 06:14:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:x-received :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=NhVK2vFzDIDGLWsooFbo4BQoKKAR1NDsLMGBJFB163o=; b=HHVXo3EZqat95m/XMKL1vj4mNfIavh3bCuOF0LopkfgJ9XC1Mb6Ze7LbemHxgmxcQw +dI0kLBkP3OJShiD+OzTdXn+4u06gai6/ub9GZVz/RwaE3RWfgcuJlWMLA+cnrCiN7U3 ytMiAykyIcjta9u+9Vx1tpgFt2yxP8wZD4vNh80axJdOZWfed99Jbf66lHVMuzKH0aOT rLgowz8C4VEfYguHsdOVZ3nbx/g0mkWePtzAomXAlnR8/xaygLtEUuhnQhbSerzRGjex mUyIpnFb3yRwVsb7x+vubZaPN0W5ju7kghvNZTr2SUkgWL0WsmuVfp8RxIxiZIrObMOD 58qg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:x-received :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=NhVK2vFzDIDGLWsooFbo4BQoKKAR1NDsLMGBJFB163o=; b=KaJe5Kl4naZm6Lk8RGiCPvqBPSOOI+Z3DGVm5JBYsetqamBASBvLx/PrDhXfUHSz6L 29r0Wy9IlZnMJ9xCEWafytSULdsp46Q/TYQOU7ZWNghnxj4hZqZvD1olthRYaF9erFmQ P5LnEANWFfZd6XJXcMxPuA359Oqk8CA4PYk0roD+3EXL3PQVyTxhECYS1+9f/U77NmIO P3njqf+yIZB4RQE0fKtneXdn/7CAhtX8KuS82qIhEmj2aUjawUGeTH79TJl5dBns/IC5 aOdkRaJh0q4e3ZFaC7OUy5/qOKuPykcWYxGWd9+FN5V1HtIh4mlKmu2p/wD0mAH2lzUm 15dg== X-Received: by 10.152.28.169 with SMTP id c9mr10755lah.35.1367414098866; Wed, 01 May 2013 06:14:58 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.0.111 with SMTP id 15ls704589qed.61.gmail; Wed, 01 May 2013 06:14:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.58.189.232 with SMTP id gl8mr2093347vec.39.1367414096934; Wed, 01 May 2013 06:14:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vb0-x234.google.com (mail-vb0-x234.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c02::234]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i16si170742vdg.2.2013.05.01.06.14.56 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 01 May 2013 06:14:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c02::234 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c02::234; Received: by mail-vb0-f52.google.com with SMTP id q16so1206355vbe.39 for ; Wed, 01 May 2013 06:14:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.220.67.67 with SMTP id q3mr825179vci.38.1367414096808; Wed, 01 May 2013 06:14:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.116.204 with HTTP; Wed, 1 May 2013 06:14:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <7a66a7f2-4f60-434f-82e5-8de0f47c6e90@googlegroups.com> From: Jacob Errington Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 09:14:35 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: what {me lo broda ku} means and why not allow {selbri NOI} To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" X-Original-Sender: nictytan@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c02::234 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nictytan@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3435f8807d4204dba7e780 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --047d7b3435f8807d4204dba7e780 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 1 May 2013 08:18, Michael Turniansky wrote: > Jacob Errington: > >> Regardless of these transformations, I have to admit that using >> selbri-NOI like this is *weird* in cases where the selbri isn't a noun-type >> selbri (having a definition of {x1 is a ...}) > > > Such thinking in itself is (AFAIC) malrarbau. There really are no such > things as "noun-type" selbri. Or, conversely, all selbri are "noun-type". > Name one that isn't. Any selbri that can take a LE in front of it (i.e. > all of them) is noun-type. Please tell me any that aren't. I've long > advocated for selbri+NOI, and I don't think it should be that difficult. I > see them as ko'a broda NOI brode -> ko'a me lo broda NOI brode me'u > > Haha. The point I raised in one of my mails is that the very *concept* of selbri+NOI stems from malrarbau: >"This is the house that I used to live in." "This is the dog that I take care of." "This is my friend whom I've known for a long time." What do these all have in common? Nouns. Thus, selbri+NOI will get used to just more easily gloss european languages that allow this sort of thing. Turns out I also said that already: >All they [the various possible extensions of relative clauses] really do is make a certain number of naive assumptions about relative clauses true. You're right though. All selbri are equal. However, some are extremely nounish in their meaning. Some selbri will almost never appear inside {nu}, for instance, which is a typical indicator that they are "nouns". I challenge someone to find a use of {lo nu stizu} in the corpus, zo'oru'e. In general, all these selbri are defined in English using the verb "to be". All in all, if one really just *speaks Lojban*, one realizes that selbri+NOI isn't needed. There're other (IMO better) ways to get your point across. (I've given loads of examples in my second post in this thread.) There're features of Lojban that I might like to have in English; that doesn't mean that I try to change the language to get them. .i mi'e la tsani mu'o -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --047d7b3435f8807d4204dba7e780 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 1 May 2013 08:18, Michael Turniansky = <mturniansky@= gmail.com> wrote:
Jacob Errington:
Regardless of these transformations, I have to admit that using selbri-NO= I like this is *weird* in cases where the selbri isn't a noun-type selb= ri (having a definition of {x1 is a <something> ...})

=A0 Such thinking in itself is (AFAIC) =A0malrarbau. =A0There really are= no such things as "noun-type" selbri. =A0Or, conversely, all sel= bri are "noun-type". =A0Name one that isn't. Any selbri that = can take a LE in front of it (i.e. all of them) is noun-type. =A0Please tel= l me any that aren't. =A0 I've long advocated for selbri+NOI, and I= don't think it should be that difficult. =A0I see them as ko'a bro= da NOI brode -> ko'a me lo broda NOI brode me'u=A0


Haha. The point= I raised in one of my mails is that the very *concept* of selbri+NOI stems= from malrarbau:

>"This is th= e house that I used to live in." "This is the dog that I take car= e of." "This is my friend whom I've known for a long time.&qu= ot; What do these all have in common? Nouns.=A0

Thus, selbri+NOI will get used to just more= easily gloss european languages that allow this sort of thing. Turns out I= also said that already:

>All they= [the various possible extensions of relative clauses] really do is make a = certain number of naive assumptions about relative clauses true.

You're right though. All selbr= i are equal. However, some are extremely nounish in their meaning. Some sel= bri will almost never appear inside {nu}, for instance, which is a typical = indicator that they are "nouns". I challenge someone to find a us= e of {lo nu stizu} in the corpus, zo'oru'e. In general, all these s= elbri are defined in English using the verb "to be".

Al= l in all, if one really just *speaks Lojban*, one realizes that selbri+NOI = isn't needed. There're other (IMO better) ways to get your point ac= ross. (I've given loads of examples in my second post in this thread.) = There're features of Lojban that I might like to have in English; that = doesn't mean that I try to change the language to get them.

.i mi'e la tsani mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
--047d7b3435f8807d4204dba7e780--