Received: from mail-ye0-f191.google.com ([209.85.213.191]:57777) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UXo0T-0003np-T7 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 00:32:47 -0700 Received: by mail-ye0-f191.google.com with SMTP id l8sf85798yen.18 for ; Thu, 02 May 2013 00:32:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=dzVub36kbPktEdNOqni1erGeZT+WQ0ERupU6mlsy8v4=; b=AGu+HRhOYyNmSF7Brxhgs73iMaAHhqqKZe1mNx++31UmM1MYlm13ofdLoer3NrITwb W51xdvntQqo/NJtp6+ZkjqDAPTFCjZOEURxU251uDNUhOVLM2QWSfaHNupEtQTsQk1i4 VHJ0oN3GkWylWlpFL/9FaPhwoPymDcNZFoPxoLYgbykPkpLUnFXkAyOI2Vx8N+aurYCm ll7m/sxAelI0sGlVnKkciqUEhdg10yXsdjuXIcGIJCxY105W4cF4PYLzxdli6Srxb50w DHnRFVLTXCtde1VoQSeyOnyQEHDUAG/tFd5A8Jim6gboXnbbmJl5VTOxPFMtW087ZnHf FngQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=dzVub36kbPktEdNOqni1erGeZT+WQ0ERupU6mlsy8v4=; b=DYRFkl/uaTmbKsUrpPTxvd7cqM6oLfS1odPRv9id82G0BfhnhEqnUUFBauqwWIFLqC jrwTBLXuhFONCOtuW02mvogYLSSFRvKO+/zBgbJv2MERAZPZE1sjSwQ+yaikjWRNVMl8 G+oguYfXaoOvWQjONpjvHtS+DYcVQ6BbtciugpPnOPn+F3vjyveBrI1GvMchYYzkqz9K GaxuDx5puC54AlrxwbUsVFljmaQ687YVmCtu2kXpBHzXa+hDHlHnM1SkwwKy1555JANS 72DanfhnPnf/rnx2I742hBVZODfkbPdJoqu1qTOZASx/+dvhLbkZamWIlJJIuuZZUI/Y /HQw== X-Received: by 10.49.86.98 with SMTP id o2mr460918qez.4.1367479959558; Thu, 02 May 2013 00:32:39 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.109.105 with SMTP id hr9ls1040035qeb.6.gmail; Thu, 02 May 2013 00:32:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.85.106 with SMTP id g10mr455385qez.13.1367479958126; Thu, 02 May 2013 00:32:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 00:32:37 -0700 (PDT) From: la gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <0F516237-AE3D-40F4-816E-30A0946BB198@yahoo.com> References: <5d22d3a4-46ca-4f77-bff4-5aa52f193e13@googlegroups.com> <1367077174.81679.YahooMailNeo@web184406.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <64004f6e-1230-4ea5-9e50-d47c4f125465@googlegroups.com> <2522542.hS9FGoL6dn@caracal> <1367185250.6160.YahooMailNeo@web184401.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <517DCF53.4010609@lojban.org> <1367261750.58291.YahooMailNeo@web184402.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <5180BF5D.2020700@lojban.org> <0F516237-AE3D-40F4-816E-30A0946BB198@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] Should I quit learning Lojban? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_103_18415326.1367479957613" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_103_18415326.1367479957613 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wednesday, May 1, 2013 6:37:10 PM UTC+4, clifford wrote: > > Well, standard among those who care about such things (the logic that > keeps creeping in despite the best efforts of speakers and word makers). > Please, stop posting about this in this topic. A separate one has been created. > > Sent from my iPad > > On May 1, 2013, at 2:08, "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" < > loj...@lojban.org > wrote: > > > John E Clifford wrote: > >> Well, the "standard semantics" of Lojban makes the referents of all 'lo > >> broda' expressions things in the operant sense, "the salient node in > >> the upward semilattice on the extension of {broda} under jest ) > >> (part-whole)", so anything between all the brodas and a microscopic > >> speck of broda goo, as the case requires. > > > > Since when does Lojban have a standard semantics? Not while I worked on > the design - I knew (and still know) that I have too little understanding > of semantics to standardize anything. > > > > I tried at times to come up with rules of thumb useful for English > speakers learning Lojban (i.e translation strategies), but I don't think I > ever codified any of them, and certainly never made them part of the > language definition. > > > >> The Nootka experience is directly relevant here, since what you got > from > >> sentences were, in Lojban, merely complex selbri, not bridi at all for > >> lack of a sumti. Nootka is apparently a property or process language > >> which can express complete sentences without a reference to things. > > > > The example I worked from, mentioned in some article, was in fact a > sentence expressed as a single word, presumably a brivla in Lojban terms, > so that was how I tried to translate it. > > > > If Nootka is indeed a property language, then probably other languages > from the same family are, as well. I think that was Pacific Northwest > Amerind - no idea what other languages are related. > > > > lojbab > > > > -- > > Bob LeChevalier loj...@lojban.org www.lojban.org > > President and Founder, The Logical Language Group, Inc. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "lojban" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com . > > To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com. > > > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_103_18415326.1367479957613 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wednesday, May 1, 2013 6:37:10 PM UTC+4, clifford wrote:Well, standard among those who care ab= out such things (the logic that keeps creeping in despite the best efforts = of speakers and word makers).


Please, stop posting ab= out this in this topic. A separate one has been created.
 

Sent from my iPad

On May 1, 2013, at 2:08, "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG"= <loj...@lojban.org> wrote:

> John E Clifford wrote:
>> Well, the "standard semantics" of Lojban makes the referents o= f all 'lo
>> broda' expressions things in the operant sense,  "the sal= ient node in
>> the upward semilattice on the extension of {broda} under jest = )
>> (part-whole)", so anything between all the brodas and a micros= copic
>> speck of broda goo, as the case requires.
>=20
> Since when does Lojban have a standard semantics?  Not while = I worked on the design - I knew (and still know) that I have too little und= erstanding of semantics to standardize anything.
>=20
> I tried at times to come up with rules of thumb useful for English= speakers learning Lojban (i.e translation strategies), but I don't think I= ever codified any of them, and certainly never made them part of the langu= age definition.
>=20
>> The Nootka experience is directly relevant here, since what yo= u got from
>> sentences were, in Lojban, merely complex selbri, not bridi at= all for
>> lack of a sumti.  Nootka is apparently a property or proc= ess language
>> which can express complete sentences without a reference to th= ings.
>=20
> The example I worked from, mentioned in some article, was in fact = a sentence expressed as a single word, presumably a brivla in Lojban terms,= so that was how I tried to translate it.
>=20
> If Nootka is indeed a property language, then probably other langu= ages from the same family are, as well.  I think that was Pacific Nort= hwest Amerind - no idea what other languages are related.
>=20
> lojbab
>=20
> --=20
> Bob LeChevalier    loj...@lojban.org   &n= bsp;www.lojban.org
> President and Founder, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
>=20
> --=20
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google= Groups "lojban" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, = send an email to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com= .
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl= =3Den.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out<= /a>.
>=20
>=20

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
------=_Part_103_18415326.1367479957613--