Received: from mail-ob0-f183.google.com ([209.85.214.183]:63962) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UY5Ly-0001bJ-Uq for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 19:04:19 -0700 Received: by mail-ob0-f183.google.com with SMTP id eh20sf340985obb.10 for ; Thu, 02 May 2013 19:04:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf :x-yahoo-newman-property:x-yahoo-newman-id:x-ymail-osg :x-rocket-mimeinfo:x-mailer:references:message-id:date:from:reply-to :subject:to:in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=D5zsxUIJysTDppCGckli6pXc7fTFWXujoKeG7YFSZrs=; b=riSi2J9d3GMr4wDl/dK/52dl9EN7xIdG+B0VVQOwsNbYZ3hU/fKS5VE3fXEt8xguPB fH0UN6iDdLgYsVHlbsJYXVq3wDyHOZlUWlwsSibfC/RghGYKcs7x+8Jet7JwA0XWvECu B3uZu90e9aVAOr2ghdXwEHV/YIE4KAwfB6j6EUjWPeLhai5wgqX4WLmStyNZceIq8Kf+ GlEsT9MCAdRjG4q/CfqygGy31w/pULHlfEOW5PFUObDRDdicqLn/7vc09KgJdZmfYN+5 p/00Wcv2aLGHV1LXV+7IibRNFjk12RpPzFSYcZMJnGSk1QsHmg38YCBW/e2JghZG1odY 3wpw== X-Received: by 10.49.85.106 with SMTP id g10mr859100qez.13.1367546640791; Thu, 02 May 2013 19:04:00 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.50.197 with SMTP id e5ls1624085qeo.42.gmail; Thu, 02 May 2013 19:04:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.236.183.98 with SMTP id p62mr7238618yhm.3.1367546640085; Thu, 02 May 2013 19:04:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm13-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com (nm13-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com. [66.94.236.13]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q46si776134yhh.4.2013.05.02.19.03.59 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 02 May 2013 19:04:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.236.13 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.94.236.13; Received: from [66.94.237.194] by nm13.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 May 2013 02:03:59 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.103] by tm5.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 May 2013 02:03:59 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1008.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 May 2013 02:03:59 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 410598.33207.bm@omp1008.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 21571 invoked by uid 60001); 3 May 2013 02:03:58 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: echu.HwVM1mMK8_TjCxOY7p3DDFBR955n.BUQI56rdjAImv 35l8ldV5HrFG94E6OpghCNMrvKKJZYimurVUo1NrcH07Ie7XGE0DMiVhaVnd hKW4TKmGNmxzoHFrVAr4uZRhHPcwnYAabYlmeN_C8IT9GK481VEc2rTUjAhS mcHn_PEyjy2u2lHqnEM_sAAZjEPk2rjgXwUoSr90D9lSxusU269AT987r.Uq 57v74hE.xR1ZK_hqfPiAwpcPZIVBBrf4f5O4Bd.vskznajFAx48pn6.hzr.8 XTPNZdhaJ._xRn1BNEY1wxZ4o.YY.dHhVRR_LcGqNpBnQWMI9oGZTphKfcC3 cliP3JJmkJmZaGiNyAMJbhJuwhVG2izA5n06ke0l45.ZVSCUxkXu7ljDXfZ7 vwfyUxEf.oq.8gtNsKVHdK6gn8am0Eu.Z4kUYZUlI0J8R8V_YuN2tqFQHK8j UDMG8Q_8z45ldLGwttTRjo7XiG1CrXK7PtDyw0sIijrIXX_7d7Oeua8jz.jZ ksUxpatbjWKv0lf_f7x_gSg_j2RsXwmM16p4nXp2VmqX.PAjV_PKwZ4AxCwS C20XX9SbORQJ4ZssYUiRzwLgGneDdwEzQ8u25rA6olBJdkbbEUornwRm8KUR qP0hUuktdy4lLDVWZeZzVZZBtzpoPvqU_6Q0NzgyHE3JJiK83Acm6ha_RjQo DAigjQPEYCgcyu4mv9pnyEc3tzz3B0V_a Received: from [99.92.108.194] by web184405.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 02 May 2013 19:03:58 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001,U28sIHRoZSBzdG9jayBsb2dsYW5nIGRlZmluaXRpb246IGEgbGFuZ3VhZ2UgKHRoaXMgaXMgbG9hZGVkLCBub3RlKSBpbiB3aGljaCBlYWNoIGRpc2NvdXJzZSBoYXMgYSBzaW5nbGUgcG9zc2libGUgcGFyc2UgYW5kIHRoYXQgcGFyc2UgZ2l2ZXMgdGhlIGxvZ2ljYWwgc3RydWN0dXJlIChhcyBkZWZpbmVkIHNvbWVob3csIEZPUEwgb24gc3Rlcm9pZHMgZm9yIHRoZSBub25jZSkgb2YgdGhlIGRpc2NvdXJzZS4gwqAgCgoKCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fCiBGcm9tOiBJYW4gSm9obnMBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.141.536 References: <1367501520.18899.YahooMailNeo@web184401.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1367546638.21541.YahooMailNeo@web184405.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 19:03:58 -0700 (PDT) From: John E Clifford Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Time-(non)local sumti (was: Mixing tenses, on the beginners list) To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.236.13 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass header.i=@yahoo.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-1412092350-209764520-1367546638=:21541" X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam_score: 1.6 X-Spam_score_int: 16 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: So, the stock loglang definition: a language (this is loaded, note) in which each discourse has a single possible parse and that parse gives the logical structure (as defined somehow, FOPL on steroids for the nonce) of the discourse. [...] Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: googlegroups.com] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (kali9putra[at]yahoo.com) 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.6 FR_ALMOST_VIAG2 RAW: Almost looks like viagra. 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature ---1412092350-209764520-1367546638=:21541 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable So, the stock loglang definition: a language (this is loaded, note) in whic= h each discourse has a single possible parse and that parse gives the logic= al structure (as defined somehow, FOPL on steroids for the nonce) of the di= scourse. =A0=20 ________________________________ From: Ian Johnson To: lojban@googlegroups.com=20 Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2013 7:52 PM Subject: Re: [lojban] Time-(non)local sumti (was: Mixing tenses, on the beg= inners list) =20 On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Jorge Llamb=EDas wro= te: > >On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Ian Johnson wrote= : > >This amounts to saying it can be local or nonlocal, but doesn't specify ho= w to *explicitly* state the distinction. The ability to make such specifica= tions (if the language supports them at all) is pretty much my third axiom = for Lojban design :) >> >> >> > > >I don't think the language supports that disticntion via grammar (it can m= ake it semantically just as you are making it in English, of course). If yo= u want a grammatical support for the distinction, I guess the first step wo= uld be to show why it would be desirable. Just because a distinction can be= made is not reason enough to make it. A more precise statement of the axiom is that if there's a distinction that= can be made, you should be able to make it explicitly, and (for the most p= art) should have the option to just not make it, as well. In other words, n= othing we care about should be required to be implicit, to the extent possi= ble. English more or less fails to meet this requirement all the way down a= t the grammatical level, since you can't really maintain control of how cla= uses attach to one another. > >(What are your other axioms?) First axiom: the grammar is formally parsable, with a significant amount of= "structural semantics" being reflected in the parse tree. A formally parsa= ble language with only one grammatical class meets the first requirement bu= t not the second. su'o so'a natlangs meet the second requirement (i.e. if y= ou have a parse tree you can make inferences about low-level semantics) but= not the first.=A0 Second axiom: referential and semantic transparency to the extent possible.= This is not an expectation of perfection, it's a goal rather than a requir= ement. mi'e la latro'a mu'o --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ---1412092350-209764520-1367546638=:21541 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
So, the st= ock loglang definition: a language (this is loaded, note) in which each dis= course has a single possible parse and that parse gives the logical structu= re (as defined somehow, FOPL on steroids for the nonce) of the discourse. &= nbsp;


From: Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com&= gt;
To: lojban@googleg= roups.com
Sent: Thurs= day, May 2, 2013 7:52 PM
Subject:= Re: [lojban] Time-(non)local sumti (was: Mixing tenses, on the beginners list)=

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:42 PM, = Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Ian Johnson <blindbravado@= gmail.com> wrote:
This amounts to saying it can be local or nonl= ocal, but doesn't specify how to *explicitly* state the distinction. The ab= ility to make such specifications (if the language supports them at all) is= pretty much my third axiom for Lojban design :)


I don't think the language supports that disticntion via grammar (i= t can make it semantically just as you are making it in English, of course)= . If you want a grammatical support for the distinction, I guess the first = step would be to show why it would be desirable. Just because a distinction= can be made is not reason enough to make it.
A more precise statement of = the axiom is that if there's a distinction that can be made, you should be = able to make it explicitly, and (for the most part) should have the option = to just not make it, as well. In other words, nothing we care about should = be required to be implicit, to the extent possible. English more or less fa= ils to meet this requirement all the way down at the grammatical level, sin= ce you can't really maintain control of how clauses attach to one another.<= /div>

(What are your other axioms?)
First axiom: the grammar is formally parsable, w= ith a significant amount of "structural semantics" being reflected in the p= arse tree. A formally parsable language with only one grammatical class mee= ts the first requirement but not the second. su'o so'a natlangs meet the se= cond requirement (i.e. if you have a parse tree you can make inferences abo= ut low-level semantics) but not the first. 

Second axiom: referential and sem= antic transparency to the extent possible. This is not an expectation of pe= rfection, it's a goal rather than a requirement.

<= /div>
mi'e la latro'a mu'o
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_o= ut.
 
 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
---1412092350-209764520-1367546638=:21541--