Received: from mail-ve0-f189.google.com ([209.85.128.189]:56513) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UY5qp-0001uw-0T for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 19:36:08 -0700 Received: by mail-ve0-f189.google.com with SMTP id ox1sf329373veb.26 for ; Thu, 02 May 2013 19:35:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:mime-version :x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=UrE9ndCwQF2IcHQuk+Gqw5zPA/X5bYIyQxlWopQuuNg=; b=JbvSMtU/8523Es/bh3ifxozlxFCYj9Z2ZFe2cE2Zq2HhyK+/MsTjZdkaS9OdLm8v38 wO8GegxwoenQZeZgqOh/yaNb7wrnFMMRjxl2xLIHCgvvSmK9CuHWqgZX9lBYZoSJ3Nbo z29xzWDo8zYf7Ebp9uJTwrc6nVl5gql4jtxryV9JAvRn6GSUywL+ky+oLuSJWZOLoDSR 3qyY2hiMLuzTcH63ti5wPxkmsVolr1jgfmnUjeOCUerbCzVYpGXBUZfDQ/NSANOtaqyZ qrODg2ny2L2K9+VMuQns7TgUyiPvmClqytUU5iek7rXhMgOFWyRfmPsZyW9I3bP11Eam zxug== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:mime-version :x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=UrE9ndCwQF2IcHQuk+Gqw5zPA/X5bYIyQxlWopQuuNg=; b=dRIxYDLFRP7rcOqqKpui1U8tGlqkAMfwQGOcq88WJkGRatFRWlgZY4aS0FbhgyUURN 18+Y/VC056NJeEjGI7GV5JJW4BTs4hPdppgwF6rQ3HXK98km6ssS2JdlaAtTjiWQEtf0 WTOmkW2m+QUxuLzx/AnpWzHmv6rSpnhO03PECkf+M7PugeWbUKz4Sl2TmBLn/xJ6AF05 b+p0jlSB5ljL7eiDrsIxjn2LXvMKbElT4n2jrkXGkmTHUIWvo7yroi9FdonIzBMdMOq2 uvqH5hyBwwoZlvliPNDC6XEaLmShj3i8jwlrqFeAYDzwIl9r5CnomG5vmoQ79fEKIQrM FkDQ== X-Received: by 10.50.180.197 with SMTP id dq5mr2581381igc.17.1367548552498; Thu, 02 May 2013 19:35:52 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.183.200 with SMTP id eo8ls162975igc.16.gmail; Thu, 02 May 2013 19:35:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.43.62.4 with SMTP id wy4mr8694824icb.25.1367548551911; Thu, 02 May 2013 19:35:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ia0-x22f.google.com (mail-ia0-x22f.google.com [2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22f]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f8si38399igh.0.2013.05.02.19.35.51 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 02 May 2013 19:35:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22f as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22f; Received: by mail-ia0-f175.google.com with SMTP id i38so1003737iae.34 for ; Thu, 02 May 2013 19:35:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.119.39 with SMTP id kr7mr4749188igb.19.1367548551787; Thu, 02 May 2013 19:35:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.102.74 with HTTP; Thu, 2 May 2013 19:35:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1367501520.18899.YahooMailNeo@web184401.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <1367545687.61732.YahooMailNeo@web184401.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <1367547795.19621.YahooMailNeo@web184402.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 22:35:51 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Time-(non)local sumti (was: Mixing tenses, on the beginners list) From: Ian Johnson To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: blindbravado@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22f as permitted sender) smtp.mail=blindbravado@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013c6466a4795704dbc73573 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --089e013c6466a4795704dbc73573 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Jacob Errington wrote: > On 2 May 2013 22:23, John E Clifford wrote: > >> But you seem to have answered this question. As xorxes notes, our >> formula 'lo ca me mi' or whatever, clearly indicates a temporally segmented >> mi, 'mi' alone leaves the matter open. So how do we speak of the perduring >> mi? >> >> > I'd say that 'mi' alone is the perduring mi, and that {lo me mi} is > roughly equivalent to it (minus lo's ability to retrieve only salient > referents / not-quite-referents, i.e. me-mi goo). Tacking extra > specifications onto lo me mi is what gets at particular, time-local > referents. > > On a philosophical level, I'm not too fond of the idea of time-locally > delimited sumti, and I've always found ways to rephrase. A longlasting > problem was "I'm better at swimming than I used to be," which, rather than > with {zmadu}, I translate with {ba'o zenba}. > Similarly with a generic "I differ from my previous self in that ...", you can use {ba'o cenba}. Techniques like this, with a single {mi} whose *properties* vary in time, make more sense to me than local *referents*. mi'e la latro'a mu'o -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --089e013c6466a4795704dbc73573 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Jacob Errington <nictyt= an@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2 May = 2013 22:23, John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com> wrote:=
But you seem to have ans= wered this question.=A0 As xorxes notes, our formula 'lo ca me mi' = or whatever, clearly indicates a temporally segmented mi, 'mi' alon= e leaves the matter open.=A0 So how do we speak of the perduring mi?


<= div>I'd say that 'mi' alone is the perduring mi, and that {lo m= e mi} is roughly equivalent to it (minus lo's ability to retrieve only = salient referents / not-quite-referents, i.e. me-mi goo). Tacking extra spe= cifications onto lo me mi is what gets at particular, time-local referents.=

On a philosophical level, I'm not too fond of the i= dea of time-locally delimited sumti, and I've always found ways to reph= rase. A longlasting problem was "I'm better at swimming than I use= d to be," which, rather than with {zmadu}, I translate with {ba'o = zenba}.
Similarly with a generic "I = differ from my previous self in that ...", you can use {ba'o cenba= }. Techniques like this, with a single {mi} whose *properties* vary in time= , make more sense to me than local *referents*.

mi'e la latro'a mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
--089e013c6466a4795704dbc73573--