Received: from mail-qc0-f192.google.com ([209.85.216.192]:59003) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UY6C3-00026L-G7 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 19:58:04 -0700 Received: by mail-qc0-f192.google.com with SMTP id c21sf347516qcs.9 for ; Thu, 02 May 2013 19:57:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf :x-yahoo-newman-property:x-yahoo-newman-id:x-ymail-osg :x-rocket-mimeinfo:x-mailer:references:message-id:date:from:reply-to :subject:to:in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=eKS/IPPDOwtjOn5V5r8xk2bBT8Zb1q7ug1gCY+rjM5c=; b=Y9jtjzOJwHpBnZ4NFXLyUYtpqgVMroz9zOjH+WltKB8aDhl9YoffH3pcvgeC8HVza7 vzabOEu3aXBXHcQ8E1tlZBvxEPMnwt4zpPB2cwe07e8aR06/AQIKr+n1oG/cJYocOVwh impSblPkZc5fnXOT/pm20Eq9SEayrsvyU5IUDJ0Y0Itk2FwwJwWPrWAovlVDKzUsrUZT q5/XgbEf/DVbjDHu4snza4NPtu5ruaNmKyHXgXcDGI4tnSYZi40DeGMK/+TK3bM09q9A hwFULJGjDWFPshJczrnCyaGkjVfcCfEhF1JD7MJCoro1/bWFunlOkS/RebBTjODf6blJ Lzgg== X-Received: by 10.49.130.170 with SMTP id of10mr800491qeb.37.1367549869177; Thu, 02 May 2013 19:57:49 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.60.231 with SMTP id k7ls570094qer.22.gmail; Thu, 02 May 2013 19:57:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.236.145.131 with SMTP id p3mr7170009yhj.6.1367549868415; Thu, 02 May 2013 19:57:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm8-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com (nm8-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com. [66.94.237.191]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n78si794626yhh.1.2013.05.02.19.57.48 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 02 May 2013 19:57:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.237.191 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.94.237.191; Received: from [66.94.237.198] by nm8.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 May 2013 02:57:47 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.118] by tm9.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 May 2013 02:57:47 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1023.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 May 2013 02:57:47 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 716086.83311.bm@omp1023.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 53393 invoked by uid 60001); 3 May 2013 02:57:47 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: fUNg3tQVM1n111ppjIwLS47sxDm4ISiT8MUHSfQBRGSvNhc iSZv2ZE2uB7V0cCn3qoPZzoLmz.JdJKlEK9RM_Z7VBiph2mE888CGpsL1HOf zcazZHHwQHGkBfSFo6ariPJVZfXl5S3hFKDA8wELMQPi1Ox.kyhQI2j.7fe0 9nWwb.FVFZe5tTYleBavGsZqjek0TFYA4qlgiM3oH3C9J.i9uvMxJtWw64C_ KlZhk6uYYQg_EQg3OpdmAY3BK2UVP.g98btZej3ieDJ_d28GYSTDA2IQXkoF BgkQE0sZHNudi9ZUZEH9ZVzDFzdr566XTYqwGjFm_o9yYXYF9P_m6bcUudZ8 jfl3A.7Wq1.o9PIaZWuDXdVDqHCd6u4zjDbvjeCwYJiOP4jLnL7RaybhCn3a .3Dh9ni8YDkNRgQK3zwEHyw_5O7NbKU5RAAdg9MSBtuWC6d9iiiBy16BhAZx VjiAqhAnHfxLGHEoqnqSOJ16nTmDx5Wmf0hpShEpJ1LYcPwK4MkSCVqVzcN6 vSgHoDeUt0_00gq6lwQlQFioBWXSuQcOryXkwrtNOLhC5SGwOtRiYRTnHibP odLmk7Pf9AU28EFzYd0NIPekPZdsSs52yX2h0gwdL.QTPrlF_Qb3V7C2gN_a koSSOBy35pgujxVgsPntVHNG4ZvgIHqhcvrzAVybuOZMk.SjQOlf7j5uw4ri D_fdrjXHmMbq3UY3mQLEr4bkaeuO_P4qulg-- Received: from [99.92.108.194] by web184402.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 02 May 2013 19:57:47 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001,V2VsbCwgeW91IG1heSBsaWtlIHRoZSBleHByZXNzaW9uIGJldHRlciwgYnV0IGl0IGhhcyBub3RoaW5nIHRvIGRvIHdpdGggd2hhdCB0aGVyZSBpcyBvciBpcyBub3QuCgoKCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fCiBGcm9tOiBJYW4gSm9obnNvbiA8YmxpbmRicmF2YWRvQGdtYWlsLmNvbT4KVG86IGxvamJhbkBnb29nbGVncm91cHMuY29tIApTZW50OiBUaHVyc2RheSwgTWF5IDIsIDIwMTMgOTozNSBQTQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogW2xvamJhbl0gVGltZS0obm9uKWxvY2FsIHN1bXRpICh3YXMBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.141.536 References: <1367501520.18899.YahooMailNeo@web184401.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <1367545687.61732.YahooMailNeo@web184401.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <1367547795.19621.YahooMailNeo@web184402.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1367549867.52247.YahooMailNeo@web184402.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 19:57:47 -0700 (PDT) From: John E Clifford Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Time-(non)local sumti (was: Mixing tenses, on the beginners list) To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.237.191 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass header.i=@yahoo.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-334495122-107866803-1367549867=:52247" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ---334495122-107866803-1367549867=:52247 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Well, you may like the expression better, but it has nothing to do with wha= t there is or is not. ________________________________ From: Ian Johnson To: lojban@googlegroups.com=20 Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2013 9:35 PM Subject: Re: [lojban] Time-(non)local sumti (was: Mixing tenses, on the beg= inners list) =20 On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Jacob Errington wrote= : On 2 May 2013 22:23, John E Clifford wrote: > >But you seem to have answered this question.=A0 As xorxes notes, our formu= la 'lo ca me mi' or whatever, clearly indicates a temporally segmented mi, = 'mi' alone leaves the matter open.=A0 So how do we speak of the perduring m= i? >> >> >> > > >I'd say that 'mi' alone is the perduring mi, and that {lo me mi} is roughl= y equivalent to it (minus lo's ability to retrieve only salient referents /= not-quite-referents, i.e. me-mi goo). Tacking extra specifications onto lo= me mi is what gets at particular, time-local referents. > > >On a philosophical level, I'm not too fond of the idea of time-locally del= imited sumti, and I've always found ways to rephrase. A longlasting problem= was "I'm better at swimming than I used to be," which, rather than with {z= madu}, I translate with {ba'o zenba}. Similarly with a generic "I differ from my previous self in that ...", you = can use {ba'o cenba}. Techniques like this, with a single {mi} whose *prope= rties* vary in time, make more sense to me than local *referents*. mi'e la latro'a mu'o --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ---334495122-107866803-1367549867=:52247 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Well, you = may like the expression better, but it has nothing to do with what there is= or is not.


From: Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.= com>
To: lojban@goo= glegroups.com
Sent: T= hursday, May 2, 2013 9:35 PM
Subj= ect: Re: [lojban] Time-(non)local sumti (was: Mixing tenses, on = the beginners list)

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:32 PM,= Jacob Errington <= nictytan@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2 May 2013 22:23, John E Clifford &l= t;kali9putra@yahoo.com> wrote:
But yo= u seem to have answered this question.  As xorxes notes, our formula '= lo ca me mi' or whatever, clearly indicates a temporally segmented mi, 'mi'= alone leaves the matter open.  So how do we speak of the perduring mi= ?


<= div>I'd say that 'mi' alone is the perduring mi, and that {lo me mi} is rou= ghly equivalent to it (minus lo's ability to retrieve only salient referent= s / not-quite-referents, i.e. me-mi goo). Tacking extra specifications onto= lo me mi is what gets at particular, time-local referents.

On a philosophical level, I'm not too fond of the idea = of time-locally delimited sumti, and I've always found ways to rephrase. A = longlasting problem was "I'm better at swimming than I used to be," which, = rather than with {zmadu}, I translate with {ba'o zenba}.
Similarly with a generic "I = differ from my previous self in that ...", you can use {ba'o cenba}. Techni= ques like this, with a single {mi} whose *properties* vary in time, make mo= re sense to me than local *referents*.

mi'e la latro'a mu'o
<= /div>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_o= ut.
 
 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
---334495122-107866803-1367549867=:52247--