Received: from mail-da0-f57.google.com ([209.85.210.57]:60913) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UYCI6-0004mt-5y for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 02:28:43 -0700 Received: by mail-da0-f57.google.com with SMTP id v40sf397767dad.12 for ; Fri, 03 May 2013 02:28:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:x-ct-class :x-ct-score:x-ct-refid:x-ct-spam:x-authority-analysis:x-cm-score :message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=RRfHDx4OgJYlj86L0bWCajKH37bIpxGYeBkV/d7SQeQ=; b=bnX8b9F0hhjbQcxn6KC4c67HOkm1PcYbyorocac2B8YENr4iCmzwwNcnBWIECug40j uFYPlwDSQL/k3LuAgh4ISZa0W+5gxSyzvl9FvdXaOFWD4JeabEIgzZjExZA5FkXxoE9V HB/fAE6c3tfJUmAGcMvcrW56kHAnp16YR8InuFpjSpmMfSVioPhYPOH6Fp26hrPyEmlV Cp0oZtSbnl0uaBxbzRUjX8+wZMMw69aSP8JRFx1WLBy7j/FosKDG15rokQbU8j7Lyh7P f94zPPmqlnTKbcip+iX+L8jndBOiDmoARA2OZVWqwgrhopJ1VUY2MiaqSEGetbwUvy+u giQA== X-Received: by 10.49.27.233 with SMTP id w9mr870516qeg.23.1367573302553; Fri, 03 May 2013 02:28:22 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.71.231 with SMTP id y7ls1646698qeu.16.gmail; Fri, 03 May 2013 02:28:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.236.43.72 with SMTP id k48mr8136636yhb.35.1367573301576; Fri, 03 May 2013 02:28:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eastrmfepo201.cox.net (eastrmfepo201.cox.net. [68.230.241.216]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id y31si1141130qco.0.2013.05.03.02.28.21 for ; Fri, 03 May 2013 02:28:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 68.230.241.216 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) client-ip=68.230.241.216; Received: from eastrmimpo210 ([68.230.241.225]) by eastrmfepo201.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.09 201-2260-151-124-20120717) with ESMTP id <20130503092821.XAED14322.eastrmfepo201.cox.net@eastrmimpo210> for ; Fri, 3 May 2013 05:28:21 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([72.209.255.54]) by eastrmimpo210 with cox id XMUL1l00B1BBvFL01MUMTn; Fri, 03 May 2013 05:28:21 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020206.51838335.002C,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=NvcPhbhJ c=1 sm=1 a=DJcW3uYjUF7QOSDKTYkEUA==:17 a=YsUzL_8ObRgA:10 a=zkD6yGopFlkA:10 a=xmHE3fpoGJwA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=E5W0mJsC0LAA:10 a=gkYTm1UYHfvbcOvTQ-IA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=DJcW3uYjUF7QOSDKTYkEUA==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <51838331.8090103@lojban.org> Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 05:28:17 -0400 From: Robert LeChevalier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Why is there no noodle gismu? References: <517FF873.9080706@gmx.de> <51829D51.2010001@lojban.org> <20130502222508.GY10220@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <5182EFBD.4090509@lojban.org> <20130502231318.GC10220@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20130502231318.GC10220@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> X-Original-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 68.230.241.216 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) smtp.mail=lojbab@lojban.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Robin Lee Powell wrote: >>> *Why* do people keep talking about {pesxu}? My noodles are *not* >>> a paste! >> >> But pasta IS "paste", by definition, whether your pasta is or not. > > The spaggheti I buy is not a paste. When I cook it, it is not > paste. When I eat it, it is not paste. The (English) dictionary says otherwise. You might argue that the definition that I gave pesxu too strongly indicates the texture/moistness and thus cannot be applied to the dried form, but the English word paste (and pasta) can be dry or moist. I even checked and the adjective form "pasty" doesn't refer to the texture or moistness. > Seriously, what are you talking about? > >> Your noodles are predominantly some kind of dasri, made of egg and >> flour paste. > > *made of*, yes, but they are not themselves paste when I eat them, > which is the state I care about. Sorry, but the dictionary disagrees. >> Of course, you may mean by cake "titnanba" which Americans call >> cake. > > {titnanba} is perfectly reasonable, yes. One of the earliest lujvo made in Lojban. >> While the obvious English word for that concept actually >> refers a particular kind of canti. As distinguished from the >> literal translation for titrectu, which is grute joi sakta >> >> Do we insist that Lojban words divide the world up as >> nonsensically as English words do? > > Of course not, but that wasn't my point. I want to talk about the > things I'm actually eating, not what they used to be at an arbitrary > time during their creation process. Spaghetti noodles are not > paste. Ravioli are not paste. Lasagna is not (usually) paste. > Fettucini is not paste. Sorry, but the dictionary disagrees. lojbab -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.