Received: from mail-pb0-f55.google.com ([209.85.160.55]:46790) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UYX4z-0004AZ-Lj for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sat, 04 May 2013 00:40:33 -0700 Received: by mail-pb0-f55.google.com with SMTP id rp8sf657387pbb.10 for ; Sat, 04 May 2013 00:40:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:x-received :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=GqvtYnM595TsG93Mq4DZAD2GbU6NFmdNUNq4ETEq5II=; b=Nbq/Knclib0k7COPan1T2DN3zObRyPQFVWtaKu/A72FYu0+ZwoUt6tr/Cb1kBut18n W0MrEkNU4RGCQ0CXi5sZLraTqX54fNoCcVB/uh7KIlCwmyEFzazbwswfsa4uGrgtI4/r MMrUcba+nOp8VNLfyhraDuedxW0v/Nye5s9cdDvdxYZCIo1QF5Rr7QedoxEUIUzsWuZ+ 7nxRReqChdA21AP3Ejib7QDKftIYGl5ZM2+kBhLEew6luIqvyl61JSZDMb1H4yC48hbo cA6vx9XV8a8ExlU8LPm6ukZcUlAoogT5EPCQz70dsaKbfJrJerwAZFTWvwkkoMY4UpP8 2U+A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:x-received :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=GqvtYnM595TsG93Mq4DZAD2GbU6NFmdNUNq4ETEq5II=; b=TZZbP1eNTV3XgvsgSuWdIVsW4HfBVKfDTOS9v3kd4gGzj25Bj539L4w8qIk6nPpOhW BT6HX8WlLUE3V3BDd3v6HZpTvw+0wkzCwKDrw/DqaJW0p//lav9TdCS2LRmf8OGWY6/l IvvGdmzmafMp/cgjZNR+s3st3N1cwjIVKl3rD18W/ZZir38eim81L214o9XIhf32mFrW hlE6rGzd0OyKa3BMDTouC8PYudn6ge+L/hy+mAxnBYgxr1u0qaGRKI+fHQEceYHc7dAO wRoAOtxqI7GtZZ3ipFSSSJLAmfp4uTPzejk4hJFR9i2qX1wtGYfKIbNFrqPq5h9uJx3U cPOg== X-Received: by 10.49.35.129 with SMTP id h1mr1256724qej.28.1367653219303; Sat, 04 May 2013 00:40:19 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.121.229 with SMTP id ln5ls2023503qeb.36.gmail; Sat, 04 May 2013 00:40:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.58.29.136 with SMTP id k8mr11984102veh.8.1367653218722; Sat, 04 May 2013 00:40:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ve0-x22b.google.com (mail-ve0-x22b.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22b]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bv18si754225vdc.1.2013.05.04.00.40.18 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 04 May 2013 00:40:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22b as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22b; Received: by mail-ve0-f171.google.com with SMTP id oy12so2115845veb.2 for ; Sat, 04 May 2013 00:40:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.52.93.10 with SMTP id cq10mr3916492vdb.36.1367653218593; Sat, 04 May 2013 00:40:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.33.130 with HTTP; Sat, 4 May 2013 00:39:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51838332.3080804@gmx.de> References: <517FF873.9080706@gmx.de> <51829D51.2010001@lojban.org> <78ce4d32-8ea6-4553-b18c-15f66e081c89@googlegroups.com> <5182EAAC.1070100@lojban.org> <51837EB0.5050800@lojban.org> <51838332.3080804@gmx.de> From: MorphemeAddict Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 03:39:47 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Why is there no noodle gismu? To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lytlesw@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22b as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lytlesw@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307f32764537bc04dbdf94a4 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --20cf307f32764537bc04dbdf94a4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 There's a question in the proposal under "Definition" about possible rafsi for kanpe. I see only three possibilities if only the letters of the word are used in their original order: kan, kap, and ka'e. All three are already in use (for kansa, skapi, kakne). Of course, there is always kanpy-. stevo On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 5:28 AM, selpa'i wrote: > la .lojbab. cu cusku di'e > > Ian Johnson wrote: >> >>> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - >>> LLG >>> >>> kanpe ki'a >>> >>> {kanpe} is a (the?) BPFK-recognized experimental gismu, >>> >> >> Never heard of it. >> >> BPFK hasn't recognized any experimental gismu, or even the possibility >> of experimental gismu. There hasn't even been a procedure defined for >> doing so (nor has the BPFK even been authorized to make changes to the >> language other than as necessary to complete the baseline documentation, >> though that authorization is foreseen, and the BPFK itself has the power >> to decide what is "necessary"). >> > > Here is the BPFK proposal for kanpe: > > http://www.lojban.org/tiki/**BPFK+gismu+Proposal%3A+kanpe > > > mu'o mi'e la selpa'i > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.com > . > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**group/lojban?hl=en > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out > . > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --20cf307f32764537bc04dbdf94a4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
There's a question in the proposal under "Definit= ion" about possible rafsi for kanpe. I see only three possibilities if= only the letters of the word are used in their original order: kan, kap, a= nd ka'e. All three are already in use (for kansa, skapi, kakne). Of cou= rse, there is always kanpy-.=A0

stevo


On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 5:28 AM, selpa&#= 39;i <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:
la .lojbab. cu cusku di'e

Ian Johnson wrote:
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG

=A0 =A0 kanpe ki'a

{kanpe} is a (the?) BPFK-recognized experimental gismu,

Never heard of it.

BPFK hasn't recognized any experimental gismu, or even the possibility<= br> of experimental gismu. =A0There hasn't even been a procedure defined fo= r
doing so (nor has the BPFK even been authorized to make changes to the
language other than as necessary to complete the baseline documentation, though that authorization is foreseen, and the BPFK itself has the power to decide what is "necessary").

Here is the BPFK proposal for kanpe:

http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+gismu+Proposal%3A+kanpe<= /a>


mu'o mi'e la selpa'i


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
--20cf307f32764537bc04dbdf94a4--