Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 212.227.17.20 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.227.17.20;
Message-ID: <51856E57.2010808@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 22:23:51 +0200
From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Robin retry: commands.
References: <20130504201243.GE20411@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130504201243.GE20411@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

la .camgusmis. cu cusku di'e
> I think {le'o} and {ga'i} between them do what I want, depending on
> situation.

This would seem to imply that all commands are either expressed 
aggressively or with hauteur, which I personally find doubtful. There is 
a certain force behind a command, but the nature of that force needn't 
correspond to one of those two, in my opinion.

Has {.e'i} fallen out of favor with you again?

mu'o mi'e la selpa'i

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.