Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.139.213.166 as permitted sender) client-ip=98.139.213.166;
Subject: Re: [lojban] Robin retry: commands.
References: <20130504201243.GE20411@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <51856E57.2010808@gmx.de> <20130504202515.GG20411@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <CAHxnAm+NUxq=seQpKCgLT9Wmoouj4ypJMZeXBxNFDz3m3s8v_Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: "John E. Clifford" <kali9putra@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHxnAm+NUxq=seQpKCgLT9Wmoouj4ypJMZeXBxNFDz3m3s8v_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <55921D19-DB32-4D41-B6E9-1552B5BC9AB3@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 23:00:36 -0500
To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" <lojban@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam_score: 1.1
X-Spam_score_int: 11
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  That sounds like what at least the recipient would call a
   demand or bossing or ordering about, all implying that the ordered has no
   power to command. Sent from my iPad On May 4, 2013, at 18:39, Betsemes <betsemes@gmail.com>
    wrote: [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (1.1 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                             See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: googlegroups.com]
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (kali9putra[at]yahoo.com)
  0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED   No valid author signature, adsp_override is
                             CUSTOM_MED
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  1.0 FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD      'From' yahoo.com does not match 'Received' headers
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid

That sounds like what at least the recipient would call a demand or bossing or ordering about, all implying that the ordered has no power to command.

Sent from my iPad

On May 4, 2013, at 18:39, Betsemes <betsemes@gmail.com> wrote:

> When I think of this subject about giving commands, the mental image I
> get is about someone trusting his command will be obeyed. Constraint,
> agression, or hauteur comes as a sign of someone who has not any
> significant authority, so some additional force have to be used on the
> command in order to be obeyed. That's just my very personal take of
> this about commands.
> 
> On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Robin Lee Powell
> <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
>> On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 10:23:51PM +0200, selpa'i wrote:
>>> la .camgusmis. cu cusku di'e
>>>> I think {le'o} and {ga'i} between them do what I want, depending
>>>> on situation.
>>> 
>>> This would seem to imply that all commands are either expressed
>>> aggressively or with hauteur, which I personally find doubtful.
>>> There is a certain force behind a command, but the nature of that
>>> force needn't correspond to one of those two, in my opinion.
>>> 
>>> Has {.e'i} fallen out of favor with you again?
>> 
>> Eeeeenh?  Having noticed {le'o}, I simply acknowledged that that was
>> what I really wanted, in terms of emotional content.  I'm on the
>> fence about {.e'i} (which never stopped being true).
>> 
>> -Robin
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> 
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.