Received: from mail-ee0-f64.google.com ([74.125.83.64]:50313) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UZ4Sb-0006Qb-Ko for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 05 May 2013 12:19:11 -0700 Received: by mail-ee0-f64.google.com with SMTP id b57sf728542eek.19 for ; Sun, 05 May 2013 12:18:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:x-received :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=9FPfM6iXyLcUFnLgcnyzTPpb4DSK0EgI8i7kZBRAdP0=; b=xchs0B3earvgJZvO0YNQwmVFakG8vGXirR9+CYXa+haMvNBPXA10VsnLwrlYQjdoRG Y2Dow7BQLYJt/h1XulVhzmCCwWpiVpPEhhGiVHjzK/wS+B9HwQql2n4RPeVckBgP/Pwz a9o9xOuzTbED0NkV8F/cxkl6LNutFRYLJwWPPGKo2qla2YhzoOOiGQVc48lwofrzxgaV /LYnQIlPtYX5LwXiKopJOxQC7VcAfJYK8SNWzG6LEtR2+z3z/lsvGKpK2yGz6IjSoChJ UAnX743D5Co/5r2uOdzqmLrMRAwCFxLepZ1pj71/GTveZUzOYPLcc9dXc39Bic509ieU bAVQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:x-received :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=9FPfM6iXyLcUFnLgcnyzTPpb4DSK0EgI8i7kZBRAdP0=; b=a7RDIzcE6FjTfgjNJqBRL8FzyN/XZWNEUgIDcOEJI88QIEHbl1HJ+c7Vwz0S5cbzKN gjFFF6WvuI/47f9e2P5ikMYc9nvsso9LYi6BUrFq5SaN2PY9JZu7FMjSCJsXWnryKUCB 9FWJV6WbqYJIgDqFluxbUqehvVJbwt9VO5hgr7SES6xBMebV6Iq90iglpB6gZWbiyspO lylmQGCtWlLBrRRtSZSXaeDuWdta5yuterR0naNB7FccPgD6A12udie+7thpS3+DkYHa a9DZ48j7SmTjWxP+n/feiZLuLu1r+vZgK2/DMqkv3NP0t0dFcWveouG09AKEeGmKq1zF ALAg== X-Received: by 10.180.85.166 with SMTP id i6mr263535wiz.12.1367781534281; Sun, 05 May 2013 12:18:54 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.9.47 with SMTP id w15ls585423wia.17.canary; Sun, 05 May 2013 12:18:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.76.76 with SMTP id i12mr9821884wiw.6.1367781533873; Sun, 05 May 2013 12:18:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ve0-x229.google.com (mail-ve0-x229.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c01::229]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gg6si288178wic.0.2013.05.05.12.18.53 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 05 May 2013 12:18:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c01::229 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c01::229; Received: by mail-ve0-f169.google.com with SMTP id jz10so2682894veb.14 for ; Sun, 05 May 2013 12:18:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.52.73.5 with SMTP id h5mr4995330vdv.45.1367781532721; Sun, 05 May 2013 12:18:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.33.130 with HTTP; Sun, 5 May 2013 12:18:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5F42DC95-D2C4-4B0D-B018-A4BC82AAFB06@yahoo.com> References: <20130504201243.GE20411@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <51856E57.2010808@gmx.de> <20130504202515.GG20411@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <55921D19-DB32-4D41-B6E9-1552B5BC9AB3@yahoo.com> <3A8DBDCA-994A-4A20-9BAD-A3A4F3561B49@yahoo.com> <5F42DC95-D2C4-4B0D-B018-A4BC82AAFB06@yahoo.com> From: MorphemeAddict Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 15:18:22 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Robin retry: commands. To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lytlesw@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c01::229 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lytlesw@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec50163c363688a04dbfd7479 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --bcaec50163c363688a04dbfd7479 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In USA military, legally even requests, unless specifically stated as optional, are considered orders, and must be obeyed. If you believe in that paradigm. stevo On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:00 PM, John E. Clifford wrote: > Well, yes, but only because the issuer of a command, even if totally > lacking in self-confidence, etc., has the power to bring down evil upon you > if you don't obey. Obeying is always optional but sometimes the > consequences (perceived expected) of exercising that option are > unacceptable. But the order given to a CO by a general is no less an order > for the fact that the CO does not obey. Nothing matters here but > grammatical form and power, though power may suggest certain modifications > of form: a plea should not be peremptory surely nor (see Pinafore) a > command too polite. > > Sent from my iPad > > On May 5, 2013, at 9:57, Betsemes wrote: > > > On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:09 AM, John E. Clifford > wrote: > >> Oops! "orderer", not "ordered" (autocorrect kicks in at weird places). > In any case, the point is that the attitude of the one uttering the > imperative has nothing to do with whether it is a command or not; that is > an objective power calculation (with some fine print, perhaps). Similarly > for requests and pleas. Demands are somewhat different, but still not much > about attitudes, etc. > > > > Okay, I see what you're saying which is mostly what I'm trying to say. > > The whole thread is dealing with attitudes; hauteur, constraint, etc. > > and to the extent of my knowledge, attitude is of little importance > > for a command to be a command. To me, self-confidence is key to a good > > commander and yet nobody was dealing with that. A command can be > > delivered in a relaxed manner too. > > > > My whole point is I think an attitudinal is not the way to go to mark > > a command as a command and not a request. But this is an opinion of > > mine. My personal take on this is that the difference between a > > command and a request is that carrying out a request is optional, > > carrying out a command is a requirement. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "lojban" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --bcaec50163c363688a04dbfd7479 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In USA military, legally even requests, unless specificall= y stated as optional, are considered orders, and must be obeyed. If you bel= ieve in that paradigm.=A0

stevo


On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:00 PM, John E.= Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com> wrote:
Well, yes, but only because the issuer of a command, even if totally lackin= g in self-confidence, etc., has the power to bring down evil upon you if yo= u don't obey. =A0Obeying is always optional but sometimes the consequen= ces (perceived expected) of exercising that option are unacceptable. =A0But= the order given to a CO by a general is no less an order for the fact that= the CO does not obey. =A0Nothing matters here but grammatical form and pow= er, though power may suggest certain modifications of form: a plea should n= ot be peremptory surely nor (see Pinafore) a command too polite.

Sent from my iPad

On May 5, 2013, at 9:57, Betsemes <betsemes@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:09 AM, John E. Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Oops! "orderer", not "ordered" (autocorrect ki= cks in at weird places). In any case, the point is that the attitude of the= one uttering the imperative has nothing to do with whether it is a command= or not; that is an objective power calculation (with some fine print, perh= aps). =A0Similarly for requests and pleas. =A0Demands are somewhat differen= t, but still not much about attitudes, etc.
>
> Okay, I see what you're saying which is mostly what I'm trying= to say.
> The whole thread is dealing with attitudes; hauteur, constraint, etc.<= br> > and to the extent of my knowledge, attitude is of little importance > for a command to be a command. To me, self-confidence is key to a good=
> commander and yet nobody was dealing with that. A command can be
> delivered in a relaxed manner too.
>
> My whole point is I think an attitudinal is not the way to go to mark<= br> > a command as a command and not a request. But this is an opinion of > mine. My personal take on this is that the difference between a
> command and a request is that carrying out a request is optional,
> carrying out a command is a requirement.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro= ups "lojban" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send= an email to lojba= n+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den= .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+uns= ubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
--bcaec50163c363688a04dbfd7479--