Received: from mail-fa0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61]:56402) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UawPk-0005pd-3Q for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 10 May 2013 16:08:02 -0700 Received: by mail-fa0-f61.google.com with SMTP id m1sf937341fam.6 for ; Fri, 10 May 2013 16:07:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=E+pqwBK5yrP19knDA61N/NrusUqYwi4WSw6E+mCGhd4=; b=YAFWf8PWHMCeczEJmcSLJIuz+8DMeC85BG9PTNLWDiKRkw8QhAvHqq9StXELTauC9U NHLQGNwYQ300Q4E3e/f+c+WWXCuelL+fZwC3qYiUk7y5KaN5qYufRie0XAj/gkqHLHr8 3r2kr2Yb+/hQ3lPrc6n6HBJLgQONLic3verGTVaGZ0kEAp9IpM+ATwY8IHyor88CI6QO SK4+81xJN9SrU3AZ2yAlS74VH9xWcL7wjaFIJDO2PiIqNesHxt5ReGU68eG+f8wY4epX qjME2jvrV/6tytqHcR5MuxCre0upsCm0ZI8s3BAd3I2cHBaFMcBlR8AKwIClOA6MM1Gv CWAQ== X-Received: by 10.180.198.44 with SMTP id iz12mr429212wic.18.1368227260322; Fri, 10 May 2013 16:07:40 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.183.42 with SMTP id ej10ls339905wic.18.gmail; Fri, 10 May 2013 16:07:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.15.100.195 with SMTP id bn43mr12107431eeb.0.1368227259707; Fri, 10 May 2013 16:07:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dd17822.kasserver.com (dd17822.kasserver.com. [85.13.138.119]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bj52si1066545eeb.1.2013.05.10.16.07.39 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 10 May 2013 16:07:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.13.138.119 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of me@v4hn.de) client-ip=85.13.138.119; Received: from samsa (brln-4dbab11d.pool.mediaWays.net [77.186.177.29]) by dd17822.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D0381860101 for ; Sat, 11 May 2013 01:07:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 01:07:38 +0200 From: v4hn To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] An inquiry regarding LaTeX and the CLL Message-ID: <20130510230738.GP3671@samsa.fritz.box> References: <518D620D.5070103@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Mh8CTEa8Ax54aLHp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <518D620D.5070103@gmx.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: me@v4hn.de X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.13.138.119 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of me@v4hn.de) smtp.mail=me@v4hn.de Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --Mh8CTEa8Ax54aLHp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable coi rodo On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:09:33PM +0200, selpa'i wrote: > The project isn't going anywhere at the moment. Nobody is helping as > far as I know (I'd be glad to be wrong). Sadly this seems to be the case. Although, if you look at the list of pull requests[0], there are quite a number of them which never were pulled = or rejected.. So it's also about missing administration of the project and not just about missing contributions. > Would there be more people capable and willing to help out if Robin > converted what is currently there to *LaTeX* (from docbook), so that > you don't even have to worry about docbook anymore? We really need > to move this forward, so please speak up. >=20 > Who on this list can use LaTeX well enough and would be willing to > help with the CLL? I'm not sure this helps at all. At the moment, I'm not helping out, because everything else in my life keeps me too busy to do that and not because I have problems with the source language. I'm rather sure I'm not the only one with that reasoning. Whether the source of the CLL is docbook or LaTeX doesn't matter to me. Semantic markup with docbook is nice to have, but if it helps someone who would really contribute something essential, plain LaTeX sure is fine. v4hn --- [0] - https://github.com/dag/cll/pulls --Mh8CTEa8Ax54aLHp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlGNfboACgkQMBKLZs4+wjxu8ACgtvIB2+xKDTQdKWRTimmHuVWw qrIAoKp+9790wIpgsjjto6QRBq83AboP =eULl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Mh8CTEa8Ax54aLHp--