Received: from mail-ve0-f185.google.com ([209.85.128.185]:60345) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UbM3W-0002gQ-Vj for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sat, 11 May 2013 19:30:47 -0700 Received: by mail-ve0-f185.google.com with SMTP id pb11sf1320002veb.12 for ; Sat, 11 May 2013 19:30:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf :x-yahoo-newman-property:x-yahoo-newman-id:x-ymail-osg :x-rocket-mimeinfo:x-mailer:references:message-id:date:from:reply-to :subject:to:in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=iRibfYoJsKfh6wyYmUm68ZT3Z01x/XWoWaxe7LKqOpA=; b=Gc/lcdRQwiLNb7u8JffzDdlF5ZXUIEQa49lz6n8pGCewOiWTTQZe1XHes7FxW/1RKI Nxbahh3S+6RZT4QyYMZEtm0YI4cFsPMkzD8Q6zvwVOcFN7bpswZn/ndzY7uZrIPXwJdT l0JE+t/JqJMyNFBGlsASF4PJ2v9D3n6t4dOh3c6ueActSSWquyeN4Qbo+j8wgm9rbxH7 zacIyLTZClJge6XrRIvezURyUgU5Rw77ZZMCFzy7+qdUbIryOgNOd0G/6Uz5dC6adeOe o0qL2PENzDNwFOFRt3RUdnx4e/Aq56Qfc71zAPB+y5eihlLdUAXcuk0EmQOCZOMu0lzh gKPw== X-Received: by 10.49.12.43 with SMTP id v11mr1722099qeb.38.1368325828419; Sat, 11 May 2013 19:30:28 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.82.8 with SMTP id e8ls1095918qey.6.gmail; Sat, 11 May 2013 19:30:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.236.41.137 with SMTP id h9mr11878866yhb.43.1368325827951; Sat, 11 May 2013 19:30:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm29-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com (nm29-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com. [66.94.236.255]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u47si457271yhe.0.2013.05.11.19.30.27 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 11 May 2013 19:30:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.236.255 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.94.236.255; Received: from [66.94.237.200] by nm29.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 May 2013 02:30:27 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.114] by tm11.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 May 2013 02:30:27 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1019.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 May 2013 02:30:27 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 296323.99447.bm@omp1019.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 3116 invoked by uid 60001); 12 May 2013 02:30:27 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: 9wbDSBwVM1k44gZQPN3h3cpzLpP_zWF8BDzj9EbtptDuxC2 dLgvY.OjqHE88ZasmtTvdaRrGR1AViu4xCL2Kd2iBLxubQcAxvpJs1SXCD5z C2nSXR69NpBNIYJfiuts.9jK44mb67eqCXK6tkgVgbJd.2L7O6InLq5sLLw6 dInd_VOBlRXoe99VO.5WNzfUlYBENLnJDt6kfsOi3nRV3Tob79L2VMH5la0_ BXqbxbox0NrIRzgqutB3OmkhnKZv3w9Nvc5jZ9Ktp3t1UWHZ5WacmQEnembU 656ZLMKdWR27cesxUn2Mpg3TNSPvnFjr88Jc0cIXHpDu5FmRd0CaSMPF6.zj 9gDJQzEjIJBIPn09vA27DpOEwmLtJ7bI6ToAGJUtGrOPkZthu_3FQLY2.B4o jygKfR1FuElkHfzwBbHSk4tYcu6jcQRSU7cv1alIPocoY2ZSLnBLSmyY.kL. 3YiOlRTCVFcVYbef7UdopYIjUZrpwfJo3OrmUo72hlfjTolkoFibW9XexMNN C5RlGmO2.goxZd0aZcfURqW_yIlnPnl23vIWLrKG.UAeqK.ww_PZKnnUBIpE xX972taLBbcHvxXpZtNRb_ovkNuVD2yJilzSlLXRaKyvzVU6pkkq1UA5X2PA P4don4ordyVDTbFm1ChUoQWvMpk5Wyrsph4Y69nqYCFaGopNJasWfnzd_dHr TSvR2jrR6hG0iiXye0iisgNVjV95EsbZkmA-- Received: from [99.92.108.194] by web184402.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 11 May 2013 19:30:26 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001,SW4gYSBzcG9rZW4gbGFuZ3VhZ2UsIHN1Y2ggZGVncmVlcyBvZiBjb21wbGV4aXR5IGFyZSB2ZXJ5IHVubGlrZWx5IGFuZCB3aWxsIGJlIHdvcmtlZCBhcm91bmQgaWYgdGhlIG5lZWQgZXZlciBhY3R1YWxseSB3ZXJlIHRvIGFyaXNlLsKgIEluIGEgd3JpdHRlbiBsYW5ndWFnZSBhcyB1c2VkIGJ5IGEgY2VydGFpbiBraW5kIG9mIHBlZGFudCwgdGhleSBhcmUgcG9zc2libGUgLS0gZXZlbiBsaWtlbHkgLS0gYW5kIHNvbWV0aGluZyBtdXN0IGJlIGRlc2lnbmVkIHRvIHNhdmUgdGhlbSHCoCBOb3QhCgoKCgpfX18BMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.141.536 References: Message-ID: <1368325826.2157.YahooMailNeo@web184402.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 19:30:26 -0700 (PDT) From: John E Clifford Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Higher-precedence Grouping with {bo} Is Impossible for TAG Sentence Connectives To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.236.255 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass header.i=@yahoo.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-334495122-1393718181-1368325826=:2157" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ---334495122-1393718181-1368325826=:2157 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a spoken language, such degrees of complexity are very unlikely and will= be worked around if the need ever actually were to arise.=A0 In a written = language as used by a certain kind of pedant, they are possible -- even lik= ely -- and something must be designed to save them!=A0 Not! ________________________________ From: Jacob Errington To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" =20 Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 8:37 PM Subject: [lojban] Higher-precedence Grouping with {bo} Is Impossible for TA= G Sentence Connectives =20 The title says it all; the following won't parse: {.i broda .ija'ebo brode .iseri'abobo brodi} Semantically, it should parse meaning that {.i brode .iseri'abo brodi} is t= he right-hand operand of {.ija'ebo}. On a related note, even-higher-precedence grouping with bo is not possible = for ijeks; the following won't parse: .i (broda .ijebo (brode .ijebo ((brodi .ijebobo brodo) .ijebo brodu))) Parentheses show intended parse. Furthermore, multiple {bo} are not allowed in tanru groupings: {.i (broda bo ((brode bo bo brodi) bo brodo))} It just seems like multiple {bo} is illegal across the board. Bug or featur= e? Could this even be implemented? If it can, should we? .i mi'e la tsani mu'o --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ---334495122-1393718181-1368325826=:2157 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a spoken language,= such degrees of complexity are very unlikely and will be worked around if = the need ever actually were to arise.  In a written language as used b= y a certain kind of pedant, they are possible -- even likely -- and somethi= ng must be designed to save them!  Not!



= Fro= m: Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com>
To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" <lojban= @googlegroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 8:37 PM
S= ubject: [lojban] Higher-precedence Grouping with {bo} Is Impossi= ble for TAG Sentence Connectives

The title says it all; the follow= ing won't parse:

{.i broda .ija'ebo brode .is= eri'abobo brodi}

Semanticall= y, it should parse meaning that {.i brode .iseri'abo brodi} is the right-ha= nd operand of {.ija'ebo}.

On a related note, even-higher-pr= ecedence grouping with bo is not possible for ijeks; the following won't pa= rse:

.i (broda .ijebo (brode= .ijebo ((brodi .ijebobo brodo) .ijebo brodu)))

Parentheses show intended parse.<= /div>

Furthermore, multiple {bo} a= re not allowed in tanru groupings:

{.i (broda bo ((brode bo bo brodi) bo brodo))}

It just seems like multiple {bo} = is illegal across the board. Bug or feature? Could this even be implemented= ? If it can, should we?

.i m= i'e la tsani mu'o
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_o= ut.
 
 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
---334495122-1393718181-1368325826=:2157--