Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) client-ip=2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5;
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Higher-precedence Grouping with {bo} Is Impossible for
 TAG  Sentence Connectives
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 22:15:59 -0400
Message-ID: <1432954.NhihRhzkXP@caracal>
User-Agent: KMail/4.8.5 (Linux/3.2.0-41-generic; KDE/4.8.5; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ8VDV21KdHLncsr2yhqnneNpE-rbV8gcjdkXhjnPJyFrJP6A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOQ8VDV21KdHLncsr2yhqnneNpE-rbV8gcjdkXhjnPJyFrJP6A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

(Resending; it didn't come back the first time.)
On Saturday, May 11, 2013 21:37:42 Jacob Errington wrote:
> The title says it all; the following won't parse:
> 
> {.i broda .ija'ebo brode .iseri'abobo brodi}
> 
> It just seems like multiple {bo} is illegal across the board. Bug or
> feature? Could this even be implemented? If it can, should we?

There's only one level of precedence with "bo". If you want more, use "ke". 
".i broda .ija'eke brode .iseri'abo brodi" parses, but "ke" is implicitly 
terminated just after "brode". I suggest ".ikeja'e", which currently doesn't 
parse.

Pierre
-- 
sei do'anai mi'a djuno puze'e noroi nalselganse srera

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.