Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) client-ip=2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5;
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Higher-precedence Grouping with {bo} Is Impossible for
 TAG  Sentence Connectives
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 00:26:33 -0400
Message-ID: <3195536.qxYZENK6Tq@caracal>
User-Agent: KMail/4.8.5 (Linux/3.2.0-41-generic; KDE/4.8.5; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ8VDV21KdHLncsr2yhqnneNpE-rbV8gcjdkXhjnPJyFrJP6A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOQ8VDV21KdHLncsr2yhqnneNpE-rbV8gcjdkXhjnPJyFrJP6A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  On Saturday, May 11, 2013 21:37:42 Jacob Errington wrote:
   > The title says it all; the following won't parse: > > {.i broda .ija'ebo
    brode .iseri'abobo brodi} > > It just seems like multiple {bo} is illegal
    across the board. Bug or > feature? Could this even be implemented? If it
    can, should we? [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                             See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: googlegroups.com]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED  RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to DNSWL
                             was blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [209.85.210.184 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid

On Saturday, May 11, 2013 21:37:42 Jacob Errington wrote:
> The title says it all; the following won't parse:
> 
> {.i broda .ija'ebo brode .iseri'abobo brodi}
> 
> It just seems like multiple {bo} is illegal across the board. Bug or
> feature? Could this even be implemented? If it can, should we?

There's only one level of precedence with "bo". If you want more, use "ke". 
".i broda .ija'eke brode .iseri'abo brodi" parses, but "ke" is implicitly 
terminated just after "brode". I suggest ".ikeja'e", which currently doesn't 
parse.

Pierre
-- 
sei do'anai mi'a djuno puze'e noroi nalselganse srera

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.