Received: from mail-vc0-f183.google.com ([209.85.220.183]:41327) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UeMmy-0007if-TU for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 02:54:06 -0700 Received: by mail-vc0-f183.google.com with SMTP id hr11sf1965445vcb.10 for ; Mon, 20 May 2013 02:53:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=X2fDwX4pbta2jDzKB7YhuW12q/SLD+hbTAmLD5v3pdU=; b=cEefWq/S6Sd7u4Khz6RAWQjQ2q3Ilv/4GxdaLJl8UtNSgSE1mP0kZOHgwjGuBZ40kP uQFl4PirtmgI6G81SGHHRm8EK3BJSubqAT5mq6jRidpPJxEWvLuFRi3EMcjUEwvZQMbm tmEMhG5Ws8TitHDhARM6FT/P1T2S/dXM7ejbwfQMznNLOhZ62d2BKO1Az4fF8hd1Dy5e I6RYGIVwZ+wfH6697LeuHtPuv2iQe9RARQBQQe1hkD/3KFDjHI4B4z0QQbb36MWEV00T 5iPPO+wb1Y07hu94akNLg1hn+vT7R/WVyUIyix1lGOVNr0tCKqTvymBwxg5TYzITZA2i uXGg== X-Received: by 10.49.71.135 with SMTP id v7mr4123030qeu.22.1369043625425; Mon, 20 May 2013 02:53:45 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.60.231 with SMTP id k7ls2740413qer.22.gmail; Mon, 20 May 2013 02:53:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.41.1 with SMTP id b1mr1451883qel.18.1369043624110; Mon, 20 May 2013 02:53:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 02:53:43 -0700 (PDT) From: iesk To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <5d22d3a4-46ca-4f77-bff4-5aa52f193e13@googlegroups.com> <5171110D.3010200@gmx.de> <3a8a2111-e2a8-4c40-bd66-66c6e26523b0@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] 'good or simple' vs 'good, or simple' MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: pa.fae@gmx.de Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1181_6139733.1369043623578" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_1181_6139733.1369043623578 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le vendredi 17 mai 2013 22:21:29 UTC+2, gejyspa a =C3=A9crit : > > I'm not quite sure what you mean by a "non-logical 'or'"? > --gejyspa > Well, as in =E2=80=98it is good, or simple=E2=80=98, where the =E2=80=98or= =E2=80=99 is not used for=20 truth-functionality (TTTF), but an alternative phrasing of the same claim. [eng] It is good or simple. =E2=86=92 It could be not good. =E2=86=92 It could be not simple. [jbo] ko'a xamgu gi'a sampu =E2=86=92 se cumki lo du'u ko'a na xamgu =E2=86=92 se cumki lo du'u ko'a na sampu [eng] It is good, or simple. =E2=86=92 It is good, which amounts to saying it is simple. [jbo] ? ko'a xamgu co sampu ? ko'a xamgu sampu ? ko'a xamgu .i sampu ? ko'a xamgu gi'e sampu ? ko'a xamgu ku'a sampu ? ko'a xamgu cei sampu ? ko'a xamgu to'i sampu toi Is there a casual way of throwing two or more words at your tersku to=20 outline the intended meaning without committing to those words=E2=80=99 log= ical=20 relations? Or is that just not the way they talk in Lojbanistan? -iesk --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_1181_6139733.1369043623578 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le vendredi 17 mai 2013 22:21:29 UTC+2, gejyspa a =C3=A9crit :
  I'm not quite = sure what you mean by a "non-logical 'or'"?
 --gejyspa
=

Well, as in =E2=80=98it is good, or simple=E2=80=98, = where the =E2=80=98or=E2=80=99 is not used for truth-functionality (TTTF), = but an alternative phrasing of the same claim.

[eng]
It is good o= r simple.
=E2=86=92 It could be not good.
=E2=86=92 It could be not s= imple.

[jbo]
ko'a xamgu gi'a sampu
=E2=86=92 se cumki lo du'u = ko'a na xamgu
=E2=86=92 se cumki lo du'u ko'a na sampu

[eng]
I= t is good, or simple.
=E2=86=92 It is good, which amounts to saying it i= s simple.

[jbo]
? ko'a xamgu co sampu
? ko'a xamgu sampu
? = ko'a xamgu .i sampu
? ko'a xamgu gi'e sampu
? ko'a xamgu ku'a sampu? ko'a xamgu cei sampu
? ko'a xamgu to'i sampu toi

Is there a c= asual way of throwing two or more words at your tersku to outline the inten= ded meaning without committing to those words=E2=80=99 logical relations? O= r is that just not the way they talk in Lojbanistan?

-iesk

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
------=_Part_1181_6139733.1369043623578--