Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 212.227.17.21 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.227.17.21;
Message-ID: <519C9AB5.3020204@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 12:15:17 +0200
From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: [lojban-beginners] questions about lojban
References: <dee20715-897b-40fd-b3b1-292017750384@googlegroups.com> <20130520214048.GA3114@samsa.fritz.box> <CA+gZtgKmsBFMhcSuH4L4NMLSvq-u6u101x+brNT1eAwFDQFU9A@mail.gmail.com> <20130520221213.GB3114@samsa.fritz.box> <CA+gZtgKukqKxw6xcnA2kMbSd5cTp4PCkc+pq+-QwgLPCSFCR2Q@mail.gmail.com> <f03b55fef408e1a5c307cedec84557f5@plasmatix.com> <519B59B4.8020404@lojban.org> <ff1a6f01f9f4c084647a58733eeaa1eb@plasmatix.com> <CAMKwHj3psDe1bXsjQo9QPJt9vYohkrLT1ST1oFrYUtAbMsyiZg@mail.gmail.com> <519B8B71.90800@gmx.de> <CAMKwHj1-RUJy1JYYemDiCxbOe0fmCzuoWeOO9VHPOPtpOxTT_Q@mail.gmail.com> <519B9D34.3010704@gmx.de> <1369156225.81761.YahooMailNeo@web184402.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <519BB664.7010505@gmx.de> <519BF4C8.7040505@lojban.org> <519BF8AE.6080306@gmx.de> <1369188023.15568.YahooMailNeo@web184403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <1369188023.15568.YahooMailNeo@web184403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  la .pycyn. cu cusku di'e > {lo ka ta pelxu} is clearly grammatical.
    the problem is that (like most > things that are grammatical) it doesn't
   make any obvious sense or, > perhaps, makes too many not very obvious senses.
    A property of worlds, > say, or a particular shade of yellow in this one
   or ... . How is it to > be avoided ? Allowing only {ce'u} after {ka}? And
   thus creating a new > word class --or two? Seems Draconian, when you can get
    by by just not > using it. [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (seladwa[at]gmx.de)
  0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED  RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to DNSWL
                             was blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [209.85.215.56 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid

la .pycyn. cu cusku di'e
> {lo ka ta pelxu} is clearly grammatical.  the problem is that (like most
> things that are grammatical) it doesn't make any obvious sense or,
> perhaps, makes too many not very obvious senses.  A property of worlds,
> say, or a particular shade of yellow in this one or ... .  How is it to
> be avoided ? Allowing only {ce'u} after {ka}?  And thus creating a new
> word class --or two?  Seems Draconian, when you can get by by just not
> using it.

{lo ka ta pelxu} is grammatical but makes no sense to said group of 
speakers because a {ka} abstraction must contain at least one {ce'u}. 
There is no obvious place to go for {ce'u} here, so it's not 
well-formed. {ce'u}-less {ka} has fallen out of use and that's not 
really a new development, seeing that old jboske discussions already had 
settled on it.

mu'o mi'e la selpa'i

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.