Received: from mail-bk0-f60.google.com ([209.85.214.60]:34774) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Uf7DM-0004eE-21 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 22 May 2013 04:28:28 -0700 Received: by mail-bk0-f60.google.com with SMTP id jc10sf239276bkc.25 for ; Wed, 22 May 2013 04:28:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:x-authenticated:x-provags-id:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-y-gmx-trusted:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Ym5TAopPMmffq+dm9themgOSQwg/eljEk5uXzOWPv4w=; b=YeYqok8sr1rQr59jm4HNL2xCNkL1sU61cq9gt5RuniTalg0a3OxhYMj16V3vH6x2lB TvUATENJ955sAEH6/zsaJta0sO32ui3eM/QpyAfAy6m+0nKmkkkgZUs851WbtVG7bOVl 6v4/d+wCNIolsCB2+enVT7oSchXZBHOdQTWVs/iNVCM3qW2N3eKFd4VL9KQHkB+8F7iL 4YhtCF7926f/mhEWm8+mlGb/paQaO4z1Xiv55pxMcXIyMViQbVR/QvRSwQqw/KtQj6Bn T4WlDAAjmuIp+izjtlUcLgWdSJ8QTZXm1DZP8xZraOZrrs10tqNwM5TRUI6gAuBHTv/8 sd6w== X-Received: by 10.180.208.114 with SMTP id md18mr509416wic.9.1369222088536; Wed, 22 May 2013 04:28:08 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.210.235 with SMTP id mx11ls1436533wic.52.canary; Wed, 22 May 2013 04:28:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.15.100.195 with SMTP id bn43mr7702694eeb.0.1369222087993; Wed, 22 May 2013 04:28:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net. [212.227.15.15]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id bj52si1678311eeb.1.2013.05.22.04.28.07 for ; Wed, 22 May 2013 04:28:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 212.227.15.15 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.227.15.15; Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.27]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LxIqi-1UQAXd2x4c-0170Yq for ; Wed, 22 May 2013 13:28:07 +0200 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 22 May 2013 11:28:07 -0000 Received: from p5DDC534E.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.2.100]) [93.220.83.78] by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 22 May 2013 13:28:07 +0200 X-Authenticated: #54293076 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18aiVlvkr8ayZyk2LMWyifRg7g5brM+ETxYbyqu1y B5Q3jBxTGig1i1 Message-ID: <519CABC5.90502@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 13:28:05 +0200 From: selpa'i User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: [lojban-beginners] questions about lojban References: <519B8B71.90800@gmx.de> <519B9D34.3010704@gmx.de> <1369156225.81761.YahooMailNeo@web184402.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <519BB664.7010505@gmx.de> <519BF4C8.7040505@lojban.org> <519BF8AE.6080306@gmx.de> <1369188023.15568.YahooMailNeo@web184403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <519C9AB5.3020204@gmx.de> <20130522111709.GC3114@samsa.fritz.box> In-Reply-To: <20130522111709.GC3114@samsa.fritz.box> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Original-Sender: seladwa@gmx.de X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 212.227.15.15 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=seladwa@gmx.de Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 1 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: la .van. cu cusku di'e > Anyway, could we please settle the problem I pointed out earlier > and fix the faulty wiki page. Sorry, when and what did you say earlier? I cannot seem to find a recent post by you (only one in the LaTeX thread). [...] Content analysis details: (0.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (seladwa[at]gmx.de) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: googlegroups.com] 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid la .van. cu cusku di'e > Anyway, could we please settle the problem I pointed out earlier > and fix the faulty wiki page. Sorry, when and what did you say earlier? I cannot seem to find a recent post by you (only one in the LaTeX thread). > Either revert the change by xorxes > (I doubt that's going to happen) or update the text I quoted > to reflect the difference between {PA broda} and {PA lo broda}. Could you quote it again, please? > Honestly, I still don't get why the first one was decided to be > grammatical in the first place.. I don't really see any necessity > to have this, especially if it's not just a short hand. It *is* a shorthand: PA broda == PA da poi ke'a broda. Is that not a useful shorthand to have? mu'o mi'e la selpa'i -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.