Received: from mail-qe0-f61.google.com ([209.85.128.61]:64790) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UfF6F-0001fX-AZ for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 22 May 2013 12:53:41 -0700 Received: by mail-qe0-f61.google.com with SMTP id 1sf758624qec.16 for ; Wed, 22 May 2013 12:53:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=6/xRQLNzo+d1eoB0NDW65q+dWD+D1xidRp88uEJsgfI=; b=uzy/WKCn9km4Enn5SiucL1kXQgZm+I1z0nAcLTT2/hkOSqjwj+C1+6qzCAE1krTwN0 TuLfUguGKMIyuywjtwK8hycOT6F5RabgoHQRMUtxSP7gQMgth7SImqmVkKqx4qWEJbqe WnWMh0U8PTjW5OXsGRskJYvh9XJWhK8VaZQyS0i1deN7oX1Ly0pkG9Hqq5vvCWeXqot9 Rexbp+n8B9GJGNDSvjcQL4CI5cz+Ux0DzOqltzwMdr5/OeCsk9d2ZAJdJ69QBbamKK5E EmD9+B5LIW1Q73WkkerV7hBe7X+W15bj3rWzvAgD9X16SicLJmC0zBJ26FJSW3XCoDvE rPfg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=6/xRQLNzo+d1eoB0NDW65q+dWD+D1xidRp88uEJsgfI=; b=D2sjqgwp4sNX3fZcAS1TneXSFEVt0vQZF/Z1JQyuLU4DsjYjkv2WOh1RZS2qNY/kI8 cVMy26+Y9bwg8ve5xiXsLqFXUgFwqp4JC2CkkUXuLoeJyKLefNqhIWeG1Lf7509g3FkV UU6sX313U9x2U1rYzBZxD4hafmlZodRPQ/iXjSrntxDhdQT3cEYafsbjy6zmSdwlxbdg sNrFIN1UcIa4P5s/1+M4/+2yXL+mI9EcYqTpNa8UsIEbbb0YkcnqwiiKUmJn1Sgc8x+y fI3z5KsZGf7qSw/qZjS61/PST1sjoG2GZenbRjrOC3scK9JL0+GdFTL9ok7AVakmwxP0 SlNw== X-Received: by 10.182.55.71 with SMTP id q7mr465270obp.0.1369252399965; Wed, 22 May 2013 12:53:19 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.204.36 with SMTP id kv4ls682871obc.40.gmail; Wed, 22 May 2013 12:53:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.84.227 with SMTP id c3mr458584obz.35.1369252398442; Wed, 22 May 2013 12:53:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 12:53:17 -0700 (PDT) From: guskant To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <519D01D2.9010908@gmx.de> References: <519C13CF.1090406@gmx.de> <21f2818a-4a2b-4cad-8d59-2f1ea7abd0dc@googlegroups.com> <519D01D2.9010908@gmx.de> Subject: Re: [lojban] Tags and bridi operators MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gusni.kantu@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_39_30885137.1369252397677" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_39_30885137.1369252397677 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le jeudi 23 mai 2013 02:35:14 UTC+9, selpa'i a =E9crit : > > la .guskant. cu cusku di'e=20 > > I am confused. I agree that this http://www.lojban.org/tiki/scope+of+na= =20 > > is applied to all BAI tags, but do the following bridi have the same=20 > > scope of {na}, or only (6c) and (6d) have wider scope of {na}, though= =20 > > the four bridi seemingly have the same meaning?=20 > >=20 > > (6a) bau lo jbobau mi do zo'e na tavla=20 > > (6b) fi'o ve tavla lo jbobau mi do zo'e na tavla=20 > > (6c) fo lo jbobau fa mi do zo'e na tavla=20 > > (6d) mi do zo'e lo jbobau na tavla=20 > > The scope of {na} is the same in all those; it only scopes over the=20 > selbri. If you placed {na ku} in front, then the negation would have=20 > scope over {bau} and {fi'o ve tavla} in (6a) and (6b) respectively=20 > (whether or not it makes a difference). {fo} isn't tradionally=20 > considered a tag like all the others, so I assume it would be a=20 > "constant" tag. (6c) and (6d) should be the same.=20 > > {na} is a selbri tag in all those, but it, as well as {bau} and {fi'o ve=20 tavla}, is a bridi operator. Traditionally, the selbri tag {na} is equivalent to {naku} at the beginning= =20 of the sentence, then {na} scopes over the whole bridi in every case.=20 However, because of the problem shown in=20 http://www.lojban.org/tiki/scope+of+na , {na} is treated in the same way as= =20 the other bridi operators: the earlier has wider scope. Then the four bridi= =20 are equivalent to the following bridi: (6a') bau lo jbobau naku zo'u mi do zo'e tavla (6b') fi'o ve tavla lo jbobau naku zo'u mi do zo'e tavla (6c') naku zo'u fo lo jbobau fa mi do zo'e tavla (6d') naku zo'u mi do zo'e lo jbobau tavla The scope of {na} seems different between ((6a'),(6b')) and ((6c'),(6d')). =20 --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_39_30885137.1369252397677 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Le jeudi 23 mai 2013 02:35:14 UTC+9, selpa'i a =E9crit :la .guskant. cu cusku di'e
> I am confused. I agree that this http://www.lojban.org/tiki/scope+o= f+na
> is applied to all BAI tags, but do the following bridi have the sa= me
> scope of {na}, or only (6c) and (6d) have wider scope of {na}, tho= ugh
> the four bridi seemingly have the same meaning?
>
> (6a) bau lo jbobau mi do zo'e na tavla
> (6b) fi'o ve tavla lo jbobau mi do zo'e na tavla
> (6c) fo lo jbobau fa mi do zo'e na tavla
> (6d) mi do zo'e lo jbobau na tavla

The scope of {na} is the same in all those; it only scopes over the=20
selbri. If you placed {na ku} in front, then the negation would have=20
scope over {bau} and {fi'o ve tavla} in (6a) and (6b) respectively=20
(whether or not it makes a difference). {fo} isn't tradionally=20
considered a tag like all the others, so I assume it would be a=20
"constant" tag. (6c) and (6d) should be the same.



{na} is a selbri tag in= all those, but it, as well as {bau} and {fi'o ve tavla}, is a bridi operat= or.
Traditionally, the selbri tag {na} is equivalent to {naku} at= the beginning of the sentence, then {na} scopes over the whole bridi in ev= ery case. 
However, because of the problem shown in http://w= ww.lojban.org/tiki/scope+of+na , {na} is treated in the same way as the oth= er bridi operators: the earlier has wider scope. Then the four bridi are eq= uivalent to the following bridi:

(6a') bau lo jbob= au naku zo'u mi do zo'e tavla
(6b') fi'o ve tavla lo jbobau naku = zo'u mi do zo'e tavla
(6c') naku zo'u fo lo jbobau fa mi do zo'e = tavla
(6d') naku zo'u mi do zo'e lo jbobau tavla

The scope of {na} seems different between ((6a'),(6b')) and ((6c')= ,(6d')).
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
------=_Part_39_30885137.1369252397677--