Received: from mail-gh0-f190.google.com ([209.85.160.190]:57383) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UfHcB-0002iA-Mo for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 22 May 2013 15:34:47 -0700 Received: by mail-gh0-f190.google.com with SMTP id y8sf783537ghb.7 for ; Wed, 22 May 2013 15:34:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=ubRKj3ZR6z0dzNYWN0RiJ+0WApC7wZPPTjjlWLueRdU=; b=e0z9O9S9xTJW9xjryPlehb4oY8eJhQdv5xn+vH+QzfEhKDvb5UT9OIahaDjCyvNKTl 7b50dAh+XDCKCm8lSmQjz09IAhRz5fjvpUfkH+AGAmVd7SXR+awgMWaaSDhKLmIrY8k2 DQiw5OWe7zyGTaeWBgojEJYYX1KcPacXiTWQR1G2nuM0mAIJpMS6h3o3g9eBMm6Z4w+E lixz0tPScbUYauB2BTzxQw6yLCeAnHEXH87pAXUEUJDaYpHSyJkR36DhcpK7YZWI3SqZ IbI/vSh/GavE1bLnnOsXmn9+2tuyeMZ3oMU9TXU8tGWBzqmcKPWTmq0+mZkB6FiUv2cs ws2Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=ubRKj3ZR6z0dzNYWN0RiJ+0WApC7wZPPTjjlWLueRdU=; b=XxSySzSPvR0rnoiBDvgo+D32SWjXYDMYCoQrE54+l7p3JSV96MKSHkyvWy8OoMEgay 3Pi760kYfZn+GsK/lF8O5k+5MaotuamsStgfbPdZB9lZTlQL6zOzrzuONHC8MmTGt7w1 EoZq4oHDZ7tMvpMbOM3IxWrZglnMFDGAwDXJ3yvmwgVMRvhwzZKLvrp+KAg4qx8nZBAJ d80Aorbdwyply+a8D4CkFzPzMFAbVK164Y+wPIMzcnyFYq3bIOAMgcr9k+OZXbPHv8is rQnkyhpVnSouHpD1Feej+OCVxQmHJi8nelt3JjvGTPM0j0kLvGuWiZIlX0htgFlVU4n4 lpRQ== X-Received: by 10.50.12.4 with SMTP id u4mr1128414igb.5.1369262067740; Wed, 22 May 2013 15:34:27 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.11.82 with SMTP id o18ls3643926igb.14.canary; Wed, 22 May 2013 15:34:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.117.106 with SMTP id kd10mr1129086igb.14.1369262067268; Wed, 22 May 2013 15:34:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 15:34:26 -0700 (PDT) From: guskant To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <231d5547-ea7e-40b5-958c-841711d47e7d@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <519D3C9B.30500@gmx.de> References: <519C13CF.1090406@gmx.de> <21f2818a-4a2b-4cad-8d59-2f1ea7abd0dc@googlegroups.com> <519D01D2.9010908@gmx.de> <519D3C9B.30500@gmx.de> Subject: Re: [lojban] Tags and bridi operators MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gusni.kantu@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_5280_26291717.1369262066342" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_5280_26291717.1369262066342 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le jeudi 23 mai 2013 06:46:03 UTC+9, selpa'i a =E9crit : > > la .guskant. cu cusku di'e=20 > > {na} is a selbri tag in all those, but it, as well as {bau} and {fi'o v= e=20 > > tavla}, is a bridi operator.=20 > > Traditionally, the selbri tag {na} is equivalent to {naku} at the=20 > > beginning of the sentence, then {na} scopes over the whole bridi in=20 > > every case.=20 > > However, because of the problem shown in=20 > > http://www.lojban.org/tiki/scope+of+na , {na} is treated in the same=20 > way=20 > > as the other bridi operators: the earlier has wider scope. Then the fou= r=20 > > bridi are equivalent to the following bridi:=20 > >=20 > > (6a') bau lo jbobau naku zo'u mi do zo'e tavla=20 > > (6b') fi'o ve tavla lo jbobau naku zo'u mi do zo'e tavla=20 > > (6c') naku zo'u fo lo jbobau fa mi do zo'e tavla=20 > > (6d') naku zo'u mi do zo'e lo jbobau tavla=20 > > Yes.=20 > > > The scope of {na} seems different between ((6a'),(6b')) and=20 > ((6c'),(6d')).=20 > > How exactly is it different? You mean because the language-tags in (6a')= =20 > and (6b') have scope over {na}, but not in (6c') and (6d')? Yes, that's= =20 > true, but that's because the former two use tags, and the latter two=20 > don't. The tags are the diffence, not {na} itself. {na} is under the=20 > scope of another operator in the first two. Or am I misunderstanding you?= =20 > > OK, it's now clear, ki'e. It is shocking but interesting that (6b) and (6c)= =20 have different scopes of {na}. In my view, the terms in prenex suggest=20 somehow what is the universe of discourse of the bridi. From this point of= =20 view, (6b) and (6c) suggest different universes of discourse: (6b)=20 first restrict the universe of discourse to what is concerning the language= =20 used, and then negate the bridi; on the other hand, (6c) does not suggests= =20 anything related to the universe of discourse, and simply negates the bridi= . --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_5280_26291717.1369262066342 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Le jeudi 23 mai 2013 06:46:03 UTC+9, selpa'i a =E9crit :la .guskant. cu cusku di'e
> {na} is a selbri tag in all those, but it, as well as {bau} and {f= i'o ve
> tavla}, is a bridi operator.
> Traditionally, the selbri tag {na} is equivalent to {naku} at the
> beginning of the sentence, then {na} scopes over the whole bridi i= n
> every case.
> However, because of the problem shown in
> http://www.lojban.org/tiki/scope+of+na , {na} is treated in the= same way
> as the other bridi operators: the earlier has wider scope. Then th= e four
> bridi are equivalent to the following bridi:
>
> (6a') bau lo jbobau naku zo'u mi do zo'e tavla
> (6b') fi'o ve tavla lo jbobau naku zo'u mi do zo'e tavla
> (6c') naku zo'u fo lo jbobau fa mi do zo'e tavla
> (6d') naku zo'u mi do zo'e lo jbobau tavla

Yes.

> The scope of {na} seems different between ((6a'),(6b')) and ((6c')= ,(6d')).

How exactly is it different? You mean because the language-tags in (6a'= )=20
and (6b') have scope over {na}, but not in (6c') and (6d')? Yes, that's= =20
true, but that's because the former two use tags, and the latter two=20
don't. The tags are the diffence, not {na} itself. {na} is under the=20
scope of another operator in the first two. Or am I misunderstanding yo= u?


OK, it's now clear, ki'e. It is shocki= ng but interesting that (6b) and (6c) have different scopes of {na}. In my = view, the terms in prenex suggest somehow what is the universe of discourse= of the bridi. From this point of view, (6b) and (6c) suggest different uni= verses of discourse: (6b) first restrict the universe of discours= e to what is concerning the language used, and then negate the bridi; = on the other hand, (6c) does not suggests anything related to the univ= erse of discourse, and simply negates the bridi.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
------=_Part_5280_26291717.1369262066342--