Received: from mail-yh0-f56.google.com ([209.85.213.56]:50818) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UggSB-0002nv-Oi for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 26 May 2013 12:18:13 -0700 Received: by mail-yh0-f56.google.com with SMTP id 29sf261622yhl.11 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 12:17:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:x-yahoo-newman-property:x-yahoo-newman-id:x-ymail-osg :x-rocket-mimeinfo:x-mailer:references:message-id:date:from:reply-to :subject:to:in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=EOPZxyQptaSQwZhqvj3qN07v67THb8BAm9UqK1KvnfM=; b=QBfNWR7MWEP4N5KZegafgYPl10RI8i11zWScC5hHrhW/pGLQCjjEIA61oykA+7GIIP rXNfrRMynGNPsgy7vOM8wOlKJ0Q6+JdrVvzeMrfn4Sh2r5/O+eOzotS3+YOX2C9zE2qK zRDFiFM1m/SI6SyCDCJIK4USTwjj+tMZN73gJ4Y8mOcefwJrLoOaWCby79menHQyBrhn ilHR4sQwKn4Xc0pE9e+c2hmt2Uo3rD7Ll53DfPMTpxWsmNqPN8FKQAhE+/kFsmB26WSf M/HkR5rkxVmN6igICaFLA1xDvpUoJ6SMNjCCAuqJQUOWQemnhkg8v1fYZ5M74E/w0ID/ e6Nw== X-Received: by 10.50.117.106 with SMTP id kd10mr692258igb.14.1369595877372; Sun, 26 May 2013 12:17:57 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.119.69 with SMTP id ks5ls1471113igb.15.canary; Sun, 26 May 2013 12:17:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.50.102 with SMTP id b6mr6691451igo.5.1369595875947; Sun, 26 May 2013 12:17:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm21-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com (nm21-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com. [66.94.236.31]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id eg2si559040igb.0.2013.05.26.12.17.55 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 26 May 2013 12:17:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.236.31 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.94.236.31; Received: from [66.94.237.196] by nm21.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 May 2013 19:17:55 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.104] by tm7.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 May 2013 19:17:55 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1009.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 May 2013 19:17:55 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 173878.90222.bm@omp1009.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 30737 invoked by uid 60001); 26 May 2013 19:17:54 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: LjvM9IIVM1lkloRlBZsrfSJwupY9zw.oH8nlLYbn4G1Ubsn pVl.wK6XssAuV26LDuLOWE7GJDlYPvdta8WcCqvMtQNH9TrkcNF4dGc1ZG8L b.BTTBWq.wHvo5lLZJkxylETkMn_hne4DMiwp9etPlVi_TvHw4IMtdAPdds7 5ejxOW1BKa4juOucxIG55WMttVU09VaaGdkQDu0URN2ij_euNLioZrUe6Chw egCEK1kz_sKR2N5Q7FYxlwpo5ynGlpUFsrH03h3ujRVyK0GbDOYTaJFW8kp4 9EkEn2w0QDDsWMvIef.Y.ucSVhQtilGDN9pvOgGLlTtCt7dyarF3ituZZUJH cjZitEfVRZ7a1YhUIbUnNH8_yX_8E.9B2fPi1SoOFOB4dXnnfZaeFsZFx2H8 y_K44JBlKcNjLSOFBXxXR2XusbmcOOeKsM31WcuCwqPxNHQjhmOvyMxeZrEw aG31SwD3OGrd5qomcn_jWx0Ug_s5RVgJEJPtwH3WF_8xRSiwLxLb0BX.o8gV 7.wLVi6ow_5iNXHg_fki83LedLgsuC_1LI4Jicj7XS3hxrTbYB.Vk81EJUu7 b1oZFJkI4WuiuDp0FW6EF4AyZg8BxY__V9O1caxz.EVEnXzyEgO4hArm8Mvw QNm7wR26JhFX4d7rVu8UdQ9wpvk2dmEf3fMLRSdhISfj6uA3I8B.j_AJhxJ8 PwhT75C9avTzvStijfXCMs7FtFkjYirirzpp3W85hsBHY4GoUvralA.j28Ze SOQ5Vrv9jgLsXPOrZP.45BEhMGhPXjvizYawc9TEJD0IaX21Blrg- Received: from [99.92.108.194] by web184404.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 26 May 2013 12:17:54 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001,T25lIG9mIHRoZSBmYXRhbCBjb25zZXF1ZW5jZXMgb2Ygc2hpZnRpbmcgbmVnYXRpb24gZnJvbSBwcmVuZXggdG8gd2hlcmV2ZXIgdGhlIEhlbGwgeW91IHdhbnQgdG8gcHV0IGkgaGFzIGJlZW4gdGhhdCB3ZSBvZnRlbiBoYXZlIG5vIGlkZWEgd2hhdCBpcyBiZWluZyBuZWdhdGVkLsKgIFRoYXQgc2VlbXMgdG8gYmUgdGhlIGNhc2Ugd2l0aCBVSW5haS7CoCBBbGFzLCBib3RoIG9idmlvdXMgcG9zc2liaWxpdGllcyBoYXZlIGNsZWFyIGNhc2VzIG9mIGJlaW5nIHdoYXQgaXMgbmVlZGVkIGFuZCBjbGVhciBjYXMBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.144.546 References: <20130504201243.GE20411@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <51856E57.2010808@gmx.de> <20130504202515.GG20411@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <55921D19-DB32-4D41-B6E9-1552B5BC9AB3@yahoo.com> <3A8DBDCA-994A-4A20-9BAD-A3A4F3561B49@yahoo.com> <5F42DC95-D2C4-4B0D-B018-A4BC82AAFB06@yahoo.com> <6f8da748-aa03-4c4c-bbb2-c7662790621c@googlegroups.com> <5188CE66.7050209@gmx.de> <50148f9d-a57a-4c32-a469-81e20a08d583@googlegroups.com> <518903AC.6070807@gmx.de> <122cf11e-daf0-4c8f-9186-c370a8faee77@googlegroups.com> <53d4061c-1052-473c-9f94-f8a6e54474fb@googlegroups.com> <6040e08c-2737-4a67-8e60-1ab3e3336757@googlegroups.com> <4c613eac-5ca0-4710-8223-78b868b3e2ce@googlegroups.com> <925cf031-f046-4b00-acbe-69b9b4ae0b68@googlegroups.com> Message-ID: <1369595874.30548.YahooMailNeo@web184404.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 12:17:54 -0700 (PDT) From: John E Clifford Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Robin retry: commands. To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.236.31 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass header.i=@yahoo.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-420974808-1421242968-1369595874=:30548" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ---420974808-1421242968-1369595874=:30548 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable One of the fatal consequences of shifting negation from prenex to wherever = the Hell you want to put i has been that we often have no idea what is bein= g negated.=A0 That seems to be the case with UInai.=A0 Alas, both obvious p= ossibilities have clear cases of being what is needed and clear cases of wh= at is just nonsensical, and a vast majority mof cases where either would wo= rk and be useful but there is no good argument for one rather than the othe= r.=A0 The tendency seems to be to treat them all alike and hide the ridicul= ous cases as best you can, but, since matters started off with some going o= ne way and some the other, it is not clear which way to treat them all.=A0 = (Of course, it is not clear that all UI need the possibility of a negation = around, but that is too radical a notion to get much traction.) ________________________________ From: la arxokuna To: lojban@googlegroups.com=20 Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2013 9:51 AM Subject: Re: [lojban] Robin retry: commands. =20 On Sunday, May 26, 2013 6:28:03 PM UTC+4, Betsemes wrote: On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 9:30 AM, la arxokuna wrote:= =20 >> In case of doubts we should always =A0change back to {sei broda}.=20 >>=20 >> {*rei=3Dsei minde}=20 >>=20 >> I hope someone can make the full list of translations.=20 >>=20 >> Because sometimes {nai} acts like {to'e}, sometimes like {na'ei}.=20 > >Okay, I'll make my non-linguistic try.=20 > >{rei =3D sei minde}=20 >{reinai =3D sei to'e minde}=20 > >Now what is an antonym of command? Here: http://thesaurus.com/browse/comma= nd=20 >we it says:=20 > >Main Entry:=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0command =A0[kuh-mand, -mahnd] =A0Show I= PA=20 >Part of Speech:=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0noun=20 >...=20 >Antonyms:=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 contradiction, countermand, opposition, = recall, reversal, revocation=20 > >So based on this, I may say {to'e minde} is "countermand".=20 > >So maybe:=20 >rei: command - obedience optional - countermand Now much better. As for other UInai I'm sutre even the authors didn't understand what they c= ould mean. I hope I'm mistaken. > >Thoughts? Comments?=20 > >mu'o mi'e betsemes=20 > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ---420974808-1421242968-1369595874=:30548 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
One of the fatal cons= equences of shifting negation from prenex to wherever the Hell you want to = put i has been that we often have no idea what is being negated.  That= seems to be the case with UInai.  Alas, both obvious possibilities ha= ve clear cases of being what is needed and clear cases of what is just nons= ensical, and a vast majority mof cases where either would work and be usefu= l but there is no good argument for one rather than the other.  The te= ndency seems to be to treat them all alike and hide the ridiculous cases as= best you can, but, since matters started off with some going one way and s= ome the other, it is not clear which way to treat them all.  (Of cours= e, it is not clear that all UI need the possibility of a negation around, b= ut that is too radical a notion to get much traction.)



From: la arxokuna <gle= ki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Robin retry: commands.
=



On Sunday, May 26, 2013 6:28:03 PM UTC+4, = Betsemes wrote:
On Sun,= May 26, 2013 at 9:30 AM, la arxokuna <gle= ki.is...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In case of doubts we should always  change back to {sei broda= }.
>
> {*rei=3Dsei minde}
>
> I hope someone can make the full list of translations.
>
> Because sometimes {nai} acts like {to'e}, sometimes like {na'ei}.

Okay, I'll make my non-linguistic try.

{rei =3D sei minde}
{reinai =3D sei to'e minde}

Now what is an antonym of command? Here: http://thesaurus.com/browse/co= mmand
we it says:

Main Entry:        command &nbs= p;[kuh-mand, -mahnd]  Show IPA
Part of Speech:        noun
...
Antonyms:         contradiction= , countermand, opposition, recall, reversal, revocation

So based on this, I may say {to'e minde} is "countermand".

So maybe:
rei: command - obedience optional - countermand

Now much better.
As for other UInai I'm sutre even the a= uthors didn't understand what they could mean.
I hope I'm mistake= n.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_o= ut.
 
 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
---420974808-1421242968-1369595874=:30548--