Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of betsemes@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 11:05:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHxnAmJvBZ1_4S1OF45n3dd5g2iQmFEGiQbsyBTN6PwybsNkrA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [lojban] cmevla as a class of brivla
From: Betsemes <betsemes@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

coi rodo
While reading the other thread on commands, I noticed this sentence by la gleki:

"e'i si ei si xoi si sei bilga mi bazu troci lo ka stika lo tatoebas jufra"

"lo tatoebas jufra" is ungrammatical according to standard lojban, but
I have been seeing around that de facto may be different from the
standard. I now think that standard lojban naming rules are broken,
and using cmevla as brivla is the way to go, at least on the field of
naming. I found this old conversation:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/lojban/rSXFTFeMA_o
in which Robin said the rules weren't broken. I now strongly disagree.

So my question is what's de facto on this subject?

mu'o mi'e betsemes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.