Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of paskios@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22c as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22c;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
In-Reply-To: <CAO7tK2fboCQgU63Jjuaubuz63TiR=sSp=Q8PB8ppORgrhB6MRw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHxnAmJvBZ1_4S1OF45n3dd5g2iQmFEGiQbsyBTN6PwybsNkrA@mail.gmail.com>
	<51A379EF.3020803@gmx.de>
	<CAHxnAm+HZGvy=Ck9nvogsR_uHL=+BYPho6vDKe8WGp-H4xKmEA@mail.gmail.com>
	<51A38E6B.7080107@gmx.de>
	<CAPAJj9Jidw7LiYMfmZQkzHxFQ9Z5W_P3UPrVUSb8NCykcHu_JQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<51A4A920.3090104@gmx.de>
	<CAPAJj9LqL9+-biactB=QQX2vhGrKg218G6JPSjxdg7VRtQna_A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO7tK2fboCQgU63Jjuaubuz63TiR=sSp=Q8PB8ppORgrhB6MRw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 14:03:45 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPAJj9Lwy4Gm8Ee24UM=HmqA7V+=hE3bTxWVsfyL+6s3P7ysKw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] cmevla as a class of brivla
From: tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01229c120a700c04dddb03cd
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  On 29 May 2013 12:47, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
    wrote: > It could be argued that in > > ME sumti MEhU > NU sentence KEI >
    NOI sentence KUhO > > the complement is infixed into the head, rather than
    to its right. [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                             See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: googlegroups.com]
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (jbotijlan[at]gmail.com)
  0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED   No valid author signature, adsp_override is
                             CUSTOM_MED
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid

--089e01229c120a700c04dddb03cd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 29 May 2013 12:47, Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
> It could be argued that in
>
> ME sumti MEhU
> NU sentence KEI
> NOI sentence KUhO
>
> the complement is infixed into the head, rather than to its right.

The significance of MEhU/KEI/KUhO are contingent upon the sumti/sentence
(i.e. they are elidable depending on how the sumti/sentence ends), so there
is a sense that these terminators, in their purely syntactic function, are
dependents/complements not to ME/NU/NOI but to the sumti/sentence. In fact,
they can often be replaced by the very terminators of the sumti/sentence
for what they do.

mu'o

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--089e01229c120a700c04dddb03cd
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div>On 29 May 2013 12:47, Jorge Llamb=EDas &lt;<a hr=
ef=3D"mailto:jjllambias@gmail.com">jjllambias@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>&=
gt; It could be argued that in<br>&gt;<br>&gt; ME sumti MEhU<br>&gt; NU sen=
tence KEI<br>
&gt; NOI sentence KUhO <br>&gt;<br>&gt; the complement is infixed into the =
head, rather than to its right.<br><br></div>The significance of MEhU/KEI/K=
UhO are contingent upon the sumti/sentence (i.e. they are elidable dependin=
g on how the sumti/sentence ends), so there is a sense that these terminato=
rs, in their purely syntactic function, are dependents/complements not to M=
E/NU/NOI but to the sumti/sentence. In fact, they can often be replaced by =
the very terminators of the sumti/sentence for what they do.<br>
<br></div>mu&#39;o<br></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;lojban&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.<br />
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3De=
n">http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out=
">https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out</a>.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;<br />

--089e01229c120a700c04dddb03cd--