Received: from mail-we0-f187.google.com ([74.125.82.187]:55631) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Uhnsk-0002Jx-ET for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 14:26:16 -0700 Received: by mail-we0-f187.google.com with SMTP id m19sf1678184wev.14 for ; Wed, 29 May 2013 14:25:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Zhg2cO4lJfZBqt+ERPqoj32YD5Tv9Q6YKZ6E3oD4t80=; b=kBHKApBRzb19+c9M/OE0ls6YzyITGuxhwBV47yWhsw/Sgl2X1MzfufGkFfBUU2AbAr 0KTe5ODuC27ql5xTfIU4tGuDo4ibRiaf6gSUTDVExSfdQESAbDlIESt9JwWxMndDS85a N+NgpOsvx7F8/ZTjzujTdK4xZ3hMuNhfzD+CDTtdcfUB2wFJGwE37QzJ4lm51DDW2N87 dAnac+hM1sLaau4dC/PC+2eMZPaCnGqopqgzxhydEIc1ia5TPbANoz94WLbiXDw8mpQP 9sLcTk4Bwp3HDZXMI5VP6mWIkosbh5hBH6Z8rXPK0tN1N+ocHTWlBvJyB2DI3kXmzE9W 41ww== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Zhg2cO4lJfZBqt+ERPqoj32YD5Tv9Q6YKZ6E3oD4t80=; b=Z9ot+JZq1Td3i1KOVpV30Q1mYcxW+bPc0N6pI4nLBrghQPNc9Dba8SQ8TkhtSZBonJ Q6XHdAKlf6j6z4SbqW+x5lcf9ziap+YIAqxihhFki2zYIOltqm7nCek0ZMtpQkk5yQ4r REt9xjz/WTGu5OwtllvOO2QbvQ6WLci3oPjs0WCrIG9g5y9ulf+U43SVAD87xi1iGLUT I0EDDK6AGt2kZonsHcm/LH+oH712MRPZkVl8FgVgp2/vVXYIb2ZdTmeaK1s9VUOwfADP t0VLwg9i5BJXXZZY5tJNpdpkvxLHEruiD8AMAhmn9gSgWKQ6p8Ep8lyiWM6q770dl+fE oTmQ== X-Received: by 10.180.189.6 with SMTP id ge6mr1827632wic.6.1369862758100; Wed, 29 May 2013 14:25:58 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.210.235 with SMTP id mx11ls1747981wic.52.canary; Wed, 29 May 2013 14:25:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.204.235.129 with SMTP id kg1mr612161bkb.7.1369862757650; Wed, 29 May 2013 14:25:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com (mail-lb0-f169.google.com [209.85.217.169]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i9si3227677bki.2.2013.05.29.14.25.57 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 29 May 2013 14:25:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.169 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.169; Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 10so9650192lbf.0 for ; Wed, 29 May 2013 14:25:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.126.161 with SMTP id mz1mr2375265lbb.21.1369862757286; Wed, 29 May 2013 14:25:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.1.166 with HTTP; Wed, 29 May 2013 14:25:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51A6685C.3010505@lojban.org> References: <51A379EF.3020803@gmx.de> <51A6685C.3010505@lojban.org> Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 15:25:57 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] cmevla as a class of brivla From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.169 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c374640a091804dde2071d X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --001a11c374640a091804dde2071d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Robert LeChevalier wrot= e: > Betsemes wrote: > >> >> betsemes >> solvor >> camgusmis >> xorxes >> > > These are cmene > > > arxokuna >> selpa'i >> gleki >> tsani >> > > These are brivla used as "nicknames". All sorts of words are used as > nicknames in English, but they are not really "names". Presumably no one > would be given a nickname as their legal name, if Lojban were ever adopte= d > as a legal language. > I find this hard to reconcile. Why is .camgusmis., which we all know is not Robin's given name, not a nickname, but tsani is? Is it simply because one if a cmene and the other is only a cmevla? What about the dog named Bear? Would calling him la cribe when speaking in Lojban not be calling him by name, but by nickname? We have to call him la.cribes. to call him by name? It seems odd to me to allow the usage of such constructs as la tsani, la gleki, etc., but disallow naming ourselves or others with them, and I don't like it. The whole reason many jbopre call themselves with cmevla is precisely because how outcast cmene are: must always be preceded /and/ followed by a glottal stop, must always end in a consonant, and may not have meaning- although they may be reflective of words that do. This whole cmevla->brivla push seems to me to be an effort to make cmene less outcast, more useful. As for this naming convention thing, I'm staying out of it. Personally, I think that cmene are better for foreign names, like la.par=EDs., but I like the idea of natively naming our own stuff with cmevla. When speaking in Lojban, I like {la jbogu'e} better than {la.lojbanistan.}, I like {la jbobau} better than {la.lojban.}, and so on. It just feels more natural, which I know isn't much of an argument. Also, all names were originally a description of the person in the language of that people. All of them. Some still are, like in Japanese names and other Asian tongues. Using cmene means divorcing names even further from their meaning, and I don't like that idea at all. Very few people today- that aren't Jewish- know that "Jonathan" is Jewish for {lo se dunda be lo cevni}, and it's Lojbanization of {la.djanatyn.} would be even worse off, because the meaning would be stripped. I'll grant I don't know any people that would name their children {la cevyseldu'a}, but then again, I only know one jbopre with kids, and they're both girls. My point is, I think that the meaning is important- and I realize that calling myself .aionys. doesn't live up to that, being as it's a meaningless Lojbanization of my online nickname. Honestly, my only reason for keeping .aionys. is that I've had it for so long everyone knows me by it, and I honestly have no idea what descriptive name I'd give myself anyway, being the uncreative person I am, in contrast to la stela selckiku, la selpa'i, la tsani, etc. I mean, what would be the cmene for {la dansu kansa be lo labno}? -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --001a11c374640a091804dde2071d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On W= ed, May 29, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>= wrote:
Betseme= s wrote:
<snip>
betsemes
solvor
camgusmis
xorxes

These are cmene


arxokuna
selpa'i
gleki
tsani

These are brivla used as "nicknames". =A0All sorts of words are u= sed as nicknames in English, but they are not really "names". =A0= Presumably no one would be given a nickname as their legal name, if Lojban = were ever adopted as a legal language.

I find this hard to= reconcile. Why is .camgusmis., which we all know is not Robin's given = name, not a nickname, but tsani is? Is it simply because one if a cmene and= the other is only a cmevla?

What about the dog named Bear? Would c= alling him la cribe when speaking in Lojban not be calling him by name, but= by nickname? We have to call him la.cribes. to call him by name?

It seems odd to me to allow the usage of s= uch constructs as la tsani, la gleki, etc., but disallow naming ourselves o= r others with them, and I don't like it. The whole reason many jbopre c= all themselves with cmevla is precisely because how outcast cmene are: must= always be preceded /and/ followed by a glottal stop, must always end in a = consonant, and may not have meaning- although they may be reflective of wor= ds that do.

This whole cmevla->brivla push seem= s to me to be an effort to make cmene less outcast, more useful. As for thi= s naming convention thing, I'm staying out of it.

Personally, I think that cmene are better for foreign names, like la.par=ED= s., but I like the idea of natively naming our own stuff with cmevla. When = speaking in Lojban, I like {la jbogu'e} better than {la.lojbanistan.}, = I like {la jbobau} better than {la.lojban.}, and so on. It just feels more = natural, which I know isn't much of an argument.

Also, all names were originally a desc= ription of the person in the language of that people. All of them. Some sti= ll are, like in Japanese names and other Asian tongues. Using cmene means d= ivorcing names even further from their meaning, and I don't like that i= dea at all.

Very few people today- that aren't= Jewish- know that "Jonathan" is Jewish for {lo se dunda be lo ce= vni}, and it's Lojbanization of {la.djanatyn.} would be even worse off,= because the meaning would be stripped. I'll grant I don't know any= people that would name their children {la cevyseldu'a}, but then again= , I only know one jbopre with kids, and they're both girls.

My point is, I think that the meaning = is important- and I realize that calling myself .aionys. doesn't live u= p to that, being as it's a meaningless Lojbanization of my online nickn= ame. Honestly, my only reason for keeping .aionys. is that I've had it = for so long everyone knows me by it, and I honestly have no idea what descr= iptive name I'd give myself anyway, being the uncreative person I am, i= n contrast to la stela selckiku, la selpa'i, la tsani, etc.

I mea= n, what would be the cmene for {la dansu kansa be lo labno}?

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'= ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
--001a11c374640a091804dde2071d--