Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) client-ip=2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5;
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] cmevla as a class of brivla
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 00:49:46 -0400
Message-ID: <2718750.fulPsy5vnL@caracal>
User-Agent: KMail/4.8.5 (Linux/3.2.0-44-generic; KDE/4.8.5; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CAHxnAmL+Nrb0WSqrZtUhHuNwFpekZOg9w4dBp5AfdECnUwNPmQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHxnAmJvBZ1_4S1OF45n3dd5g2iQmFEGiQbsyBTN6PwybsNkrA@mail.gmail.com> <51A6685C.3010505@lojban.org> <CAHxnAmL+Nrb0WSqrZtUhHuNwFpekZOg9w4dBp5AfdECnUwNPmQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 20:49:16 Betsemes wrote: > And
   what make nicknames and real names different? Nothing. The only > difference
    is that a nickname is not the person's legal name. If > Lojban would become
    mainstream, people very well may attempt to name a > child with a brivla.
    [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid

On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 20:49:16 Betsemes wrote:
> And what make nicknames and real names different? Nothing. The only
> difference is that a nickname is not the person's legal name. If
> Lojban would become mainstream, people very well may attempt to name a
> child with a brivla.

There are countries with laws on the linguistic forms of allowed names.=20
Iceland requires that names be declinable in Icelandic. Turkey prohibits so=
me=20
non-Turkic letters in names, which annoys Kurds, who use these letters in b=
oth=20
names and ordinary words in their language. Why shouldn't Lojbangug have su=
ch=20
a law?

I favor keeping cmevla and brivla syntactically distinct. We've already=20
eliminated the adjective and the adverb. Why eliminate the noun as well?

Pierre
--=20
La sal en el mar es m=E1s que en la sangre.
Le sel dans la mer est plus que dans le sang.

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.